Aller au contenu

Photo

Elf Design in DAI a Step Backward?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
432 réponses à ce sujet

#376
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages
*Watches Night/Blood Elf videos*

#377
Guest_Faerunner_*

Guest_Faerunner_*
  • Guests
Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

#378
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages

Realmzmaster wrote...

The D & D description of elves have then shorter (4 ' 6" to 5' 6") than humans with pointed ears. The D & D elves were considered to be hauntingly beautiful to some of the other races.

I just finished reading the codex entries for DAO and no where do they say that the elves are beautiful. What the entries do say is that elves are a humanoid race. Elves are typically shorter than humans and have a slender, lithe build and pointed ears. So can someone point me to the codex. I may have missed it in my reading.

So the blame for the "accepted" definition of elf is more at the feet of Gygax than Tolkien.

Elves could be "beautiful" in DAO, and "haunting" beauty is implied by many comments about elven women in Dragon Age.  Part of this might come from my memory of the books of Dragon Age.  

DnD would've used Tolkien's world except for copyright, to some degree.  That's why there are halflings in DnD.

Modifié par Alocormin, 29 août 2013 - 05:09 .


#379
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

#380
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

#381
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

#382
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new, This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some orginality.

hell even taking there culture into consieration DA elves aren't super unique.

#383
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new, This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some orginality.

hell even taking there culture into consieration DA elves aren't super unique.

If that's the case then you might want to complain about humans and dwarves because they aren't unique either.

#384
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 473 messages

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new, This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some orginality.


Originality does not = vulgarity. But you are one of three people in the universe who think DA2 had good art design. The other two being whoever invented Hot Rod Samurai, and I think Peter Moore, the head CEO of EA. So you're in good company.

Modifié par slimgrin, 29 août 2013 - 05:33 .


#385
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new, This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some orginality.

hell even taking there culture into consieration DA elves aren't super unique.

If that's the case then you might want to complain about humans and dwarves because they aren't unique either.

Humans aren't supposed to be unique, but your dead wrong about the Dwarves, Dwarves are gneraly not known for having Rigid Caste systems, and being Backstabbing Schemers, Oghren was a gneric Dwarf and he was a pariah of his people.

#386
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

slimgrin wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?

I find the DA elves to be interesting in terms of culture and unity,I wish people would see they are already different from other elves but all some can see is "humans with ears".

Looks are just as important as "culture"  when it comes to fantasy races You think Asari would be as intresting as they are if they were just humans with blue skin, or Salarians were just Stock Grey aliens?

It's the cultures that make those races interesting.Hell Asari are often derided for being Blue Skinned Space Babes but it's their culture that makes them stand out.DA elves have a interesting culture and changing how they look is just being vain.

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new, This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some orginality.


Originality does not = vulgarity. But you are one of three people in the universe who think DA2 had good art design. The other two being whoever invented Hot Rod Samurai, and I think Peter Moore, the head CEO of EA. So you're in good company.

a look through this thread shows that its more then 3

and vulgarity really -_-?

#387
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages

Faerunner wrote...

Does anyone like elves for their cultures, characters, or personalities?

Why do so many people care only about their looks and nothing else?


A fair point.  Elves tend to be denigrated as tree-huggers and flamboyant, pretentious artiste types. Many find those traits repulsive. In DA they're underdogs.  

Just my two thoughts.

#388
Guest_Faerunner_*

Guest_Faerunner_*
  • Guests

MerchantGOL wrote...

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new,


I could say the same about your grammar. Sorry, but how some words are spelled matters. In a visual medium like the internet, you can't just slap any letter on any word and expect people to be impressed. People like to see something well-written and well-spelled.
As far as your "argument," well aren't you shallow. Image IPB



This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some originality.

Like the Qunari, the Veil, the Fade, the Deep Roads, the brontos, the nugs, the darkspawn, the intelligent darkspawn, the broodmothers, the ties to many real Medieval historical events, civilizations, religions, minorities, politics, etc? Yeah, none of that ever happened. It's all the same rehashed crap because they didn't make one established fantasy race out of several look like a new race.

One race doesn't look zomg exotic, therefore the entire game lacks originality!

Modifié par Faerunner, 29 août 2013 - 05:44 .


#389
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages
DA elves are a very different take. Analogous to Native Americans. Not original, but original for elves. Fantasy races tend to dodge modern analogy.

I think DA2 made them a little too childlike in appearance.

I like your arguments about elves Fae.

Modifié par Alocormin, 29 août 2013 - 05:52 .


#390
Bayonet Hipshot

Bayonet Hipshot
  • Members
  • 6 768 messages
Have not seen actual in game footage of elves..So I will withhold my judgement...

#391
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

Faerunner wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

no its not, sorry but how some thing looks matters, in visual media, you can't just  Slap pointy ears on some thign and expect peopl to be impressed, people like to see soem thing new,



As far as your "argument," well aren't you shallow. Image IPB

It's not shallow, were not talking abot likign some one for there personality, were talkign about a visual medium, not a book were you can imagine, it were talkign about imersion in a world, the spectacal of what your seeing, you think half assing it is good, well you would make a poor game designer, that the same type of thinkign that gets us the same girtty modern shooter over and over.


This is called the fantasy genre, lets see some originality.

Like the Qunari, the Veil, the Fade, the Deep Roads, the brontos, the nugs, the darkspawn, the intelligent darkspawn, the broodmothers, the ties to many real Medieval historical events, civilizations, religions, minorities, politics, etc? Yeah, none of that ever happened. It's all the same rehashed crap because they didn't make one established fantasy race out of several look like a new race.

The elves don't look exotic; the entire game lacks originality! 



The only thing with Real orginaity you named were the qunari and thats after there redesign, Seriously you think the Darkspawn are orginal? Ever here of a Trolloc?

But as for your  "point" Elves have been done  a thousand times over, if you are gonna use them, an orginality is mandetory.

#392
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages
Trollocs are a stretch, and you ignored everything else fae mentioned. Only selective originality then, hmm?

#393
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 473 messages
edited: removed quote pyramid. ~Mod05

Yeah. Some folks don't have a good aesthetic value of things. It's just not in the cards for everyone. Like me being bad at math. So I'm tempted to say you have a lousy artistic sense here, if you really think DA2 got sh*t right.

Modifié par BioWareMod05, 29 août 2013 - 06:40 .


#394
Realmzmaster

Realmzmaster
  • Members
  • 5 510 messages
Actually I want to see more variation in humans and dwarves which is why I like some of the early crpgs like Wizardy 6-8 which allowed for Dracon (Draon and human offspring.Face and tail like a dragon, but bipedal), Faerie (tiny beings that could not use most weapons and armor, but were extremely hard to hit), Lizardmen (bipedal lizard humanoid), Rawulf (bipedal canines), Felpurr (bipedal feline), and Mook (think wookie). Each race had advantages and disadvantages. Wizardry 6-8 also had the standard races human, elf, gnomes, hobbits and dwarves.
Might and Magic had the half-orc.
I would like to see more variation in humans. Hopefully more variation will be forthcoming as the DA universe expands to different lands.

#395
MerchantGOL

MerchantGOL
  • Members
  • 2 316 messages

Alocormin wrote...

Trollocs are a stretch, and you ignored everything else fae mentioned. Only selective originality then, hmm?

Forgive me for not doing a step by step check list but fine

The Veil? The spirit world from jade empire is the smae, thing, a mirrior world where spirits reside is not new

Brontos? Pick any friggin fantasy pack animal you can

Nugs? Aren't they just little pigs -_-

The Deeproads? oh My god Tunnels, Ive never seen a Tunnel before whats a revolutinary idea!

Broodmother ive seen plenty of alien infestation movies to tell you thats not orginal.

#396
NUM13ER

NUM13ER
  • Members
  • 959 messages
There is a trend of thought that there are no new stories only different versions of the telling.

"Originality" is also a term people throw around without offering any new alternative. And rarer still a better one.

Modifié par NUM13ER, 29 août 2013 - 06:05 .


#397
Guest_Faerunner_*

Guest_Faerunner_*
  • Guests

MerchantGOL wrote...

It's not shallow,


Yes it is. If all you care about is outward appearance, then it's not exactly profound.


were not talking abot likign some one for there personality, were talkign about a visual medium, not a book were you can imagine, it were talkign about imersion in a world, the spectacal of what your seeing, you think half assing it is good, well you would make a poor game designer, that the same type of thinkign that gets us the same girtty modern shooter over and over.

Is this game not also celebrated for its writing? For its stories, quests, characters, interactions, character development, and plot twists? For its mature, well-handled themes? Its darky, nitty-gritty world? Its moral complexity? Its realistically layered and nuanced issues that have no one right moral answer the way most fantasy worlds before have portrayed?

If all anyone cared about was something that looked pretty but had all the written depth of a drop of spit, then the first game would have been a flop because it didn't break any barriers visually. (Much as I love it, the color palate pretty much consisted of red and brown.) But it wasn't. It was a critical and financial success on account of its story, characters, roleplay strength, world reactivity, etc. I read dozens upon dozens of player-written reviews on several websites when I first looked into DA:O. While most of them admitted the visuals and sometimes combat weren't that great, most of them rated it highly on account of the story, characters, moral complexity, roleplay freedom and reactivity, etc.

If all anyone cared about was something that looked pretty but lacked depth, then DA2 would have been a runaway success and hailed as better than DA:O by the vast majority of the fandom because it technically has prettier graphics and more outlandish aesthetics. Judging by the backlash and lower ratings on account of its weaker story, quests, characters, etc. though, I'd say looks aren't that important to the fanbase.

You want to talk about how looks are all-important? You're really talking about the wrong franchise.


The only thing with Real orginaity you named were the qunari and thats after there redesign, Seriously you think the Darkspawn are orginal? Ever here of a Trolloc?

Oh yeah, trollocs and darkspawn are completely identical and interchangeable. The exact same features, origins, methods of birth, intelligence, organization; all down to the same hive mind. I thought they were the exact same thing creatures when I looked up trollocs. Thanks for showing me that darkspawn are an exact rip-off with no spins of their own.

Seriously, the way its written and handled is what makes anything "original" (though there's really no such thing since, as my mom always says, "nothing new shines under the sun,") not being fabricated out of nowhere (which is also impossible because no matter how unique you try to be, someone, somewhere, already thought of it).


But as for your  "point" Elves have been done  a thousand times over, if you are gonna use them, an orginality is mandatory.

And your "point" about elves has been made a thousand times over too, so you aren't any more original than me in this regard.

EDIT: As I said, the elves' history, culture, and socio-economic place in their respective world is an originality. What's more, they're an established fantasy race with established fantasy features, so why get upset about elves looking like elves? I don't see you ****ing about dragons or dwarves looking the same as past fantasy versions.

Modifié par Faerunner, 29 août 2013 - 06:32 .


#398
d4eaming

d4eaming
  • Members
  • 982 messages
I love how, when someone disagrees with you, people turn to veiled insults and denigrating their sense of taste. Lots of people like things that I consider really ugly ****e, but I have the class not go to around insulting them or calling their aesthetic preference into question and treat them like they're stupid for liking something I don't.

DA2 elves looked fine. They failed on the background NPCs, but the rest were fine. You want to b*tch that DA humans are supposed to find them beautiful, yet YOU consider them unattractive? Too freaking bad. Some of us do find the DA2 iteration to be beautiful. If isn't because we're stupid or have bad taste either, that ignorant bollocks can go out the window.

I stil have yet to see the new models with actual textures, but based on what has been shown so far, they are returning to more generic, pander to the lowest common denomitator and play it safe audience. The new iteration isn't *ugly*, but it certainly does not stand out among the thousands of other iterations that have cropped up through the years.

#399
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

d4eaming wrote...

I love how, when someone disagrees with you, people turn to veiled insults and denigrating their sense of taste. Lots of people like things that I consider really ugly ****e, but I have the class not go to around insulting them or calling their aesthetic preference into question and treat them like they're stupid for liking something I don't.

DA2 elves looked fine. They failed on the background NPCs, but the rest were fine. You want to b*tch that DA humans are supposed to find them beautiful, yet YOU consider them unattractive? Too freaking bad. Some of us do find the DA2 iteration to be beautiful. If isn't because we're stupid or have bad taste either, that ignorant bollocks can go out the window.

I stil have yet to see the new models with actual textures, but based on what has been shown so far, they are returning to more generic, pander to the lowest common denomitator and play it safe audience. The new iteration isn't *ugly*, but it certainly does not stand out among the thousands of other iterations that have cropped up through the years.

The other guy started it.

#400
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 919 messages

d4eaming wrote...
DA2 elves looked fine. They failed on the background NPCs, but the rest were fine. You want to b*tch that DA humans are supposed to find them beautiful, yet YOU consider them unattractive? Too freaking bad. Some of us do find the DA2 iteration to be beautiful. If isn't because we're stupid or have bad taste either, that ignorant bollocks can go out the window.

I stil have yet to see the new models with actual textures, but based on what has been shown so far, they are returning to more generic, pander to the lowest common denomitator and play it safe audience. The new iteration isn't *ugly*, but it certainly does not stand out among the thousands of other iterations that have cropped up through the years.


I actually agree with this. I think Fenris and Merrill looked great and I can't forget Jethann. :D
I liked the Dragon Age 2 elves, they were different and truly came across as a different species. I don't get why anyone would say the elves are supposed to be considered beautiful in all of Thedas or something. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There are plenty of real world groups that some people find beautiful while others would scream to the mountain tops as being ugly but that doesn't stop those groups from facing wide scale sexual harassment, rape, and so on.   I wouldn't mind the elves retaining some of the DA2 look but tweaked if they have to. But it makes no difference to me, I'm still gonna roll an Elf.