Abriael_CG wrote...
MerinTB wrote...
An ad hominem is basically name-calling, You keep using the dismissive term fanboy. It not only almost exclusively exists soley as an insult.
Actually "ad hominem" does not necessarily mean name calling. It simply means a remark directed to someone. Can be name calling, can be criticizing, can be ridiculizing, can be a lot of things, and the first "ad hominem" post here is this one. To which I simply responded. So I find it funny that you accused me to post "ad hominem" when i simply responded to an "ad hominem" attack.
That's what fanboys normally do. They feel the need to attack "ad hominem" everyone that dares to criticize their favourite developer.
I take it back though, you didn't really learn them... 
Let me spell it right this time -
tu quoque.
And actually, an ad hominem isn't simply criticizing someone. It's a logical fallacy because it derails or disrupts a discussion or debate without providing anything positive. An actual definition -
Ad hominem - An ad hominem argument is any that attempts to counter anothers claims or conclusions by attacking the person, rather than addressing the argument itself.
Name-calling is the most prevalent form of ad hominem, and it is what you are doing with the constant antagonistic labeling of "fanboy."
Your constant dismissiveness of people as "fanboys" is exactly that.
My pointing out that you are using that fallacy is not.
Point is made. Deny it all you want. Try to deflect it onto me or others all you want. I've done what I felt I needed to. Others can choose to listen to you or not while you continue to use your flawed arguments.
--
Don't worry, Victor - I'm done trying to reason with this person.
Thanks again for the update.
Modifié par MerinTB, 19 janvier 2010 - 02:02 .