Aller au contenu

Photo

Gay Qunari companion?


161 réponses à ce sujet

#26
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3 BioWares's romances were are complete ****.

Fixed that up for ya

No you didn't. I have no issue with the nature and content of any specific romance. What I object to in Mass Effect is the ridiculous imbalance in favour of content for straight males.

hmmm they got... Ashley, Miranda if romanced in 2, Jack if romanced in 2, Tali if romanced in 2.

Liara, Kelly Chambers, Diana Allers.

Seven potential sex partners for straight male Shepard. Four for lesbian Shepard and only two each for straight female Shepard and gay male Shepard.


Come on now, Diana Allers is nowhere near worthy of being called a romance 

#27
Guest_Seraph Cross_*

Guest_Seraph Cross_*
  • Guests

BasilKarlo wrote...

Could we please stop reducing every character to their sexual orientation? It's REALLY starting to anger me.


^ This. How about just focusing on just good quality characters and fixing the mistakes of the previous games rather than pestering Bioware on making the followers avaiable for sex

#28
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

Zeta42 wrote...

Well, why do people want a Qunari companion in the first place, if for no other reason than "Qunari are cool"? Even more so, why do some want a romancable female Qunari? They want fanservice, man. That, and humans/dwarves/elves have been in so many franchises they aren't interesting anymore - at least it isn't easy to make them interesting. Qunari, however, are something exclusive to DA.
What I can't quite put my finger on is why Bioware makes certain companions gay and not others. Why Leliana and Zevran, and not Alistair or Morrigan? And why are some companions non-romancable at all? I don't know what goes through their heads when they write romances, but I don't see a romancable Qunari too stretched for their standards. Not even if the Qunari is gay.


And if I recall correctly, Gaider refused the "female Qunari" request. The term I heard used by OTHER people here at BSN was "fetish." If Gaider had said "okay" to that, you'd be fine. But he didn't.

And as for whether they're gay or not, that's his decision.

The most important question is why you're doing it. If it's just because you want to have gay/straight/goat sex in a game...that's probably a problem. If it adds to the character, builds on who they ALREADY ARE, that's another story.

Modifié par EntropicAngel, 25 août 2013 - 05:36 .


#29
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 190 messages
Image IPB

#30
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

AresKeith wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3 BioWares's romances were are complete ****.

Fixed that up for ya

No you didn't. I have no issue with the nature and content of any specific romance. What I object to in Mass Effect is the ridiculous imbalance in favour of content for straight males.

hmmm they got... Ashley, Miranda if romanced in 2, Jack if romanced in 2, Tali if romanced in 2.

Liara, Kelly Chambers, Diana Allers.

Seven potential sex partners for straight male Shepard. Four for lesbian Shepard and only two each for straight female Shepard and gay male Shepard.


Come on now, Diana Allers is nowhere near worthy of being called a romance 


If anything, she should be counted as -1 in the list

#31
Ananka

Ananka
  • Members
  • 2 073 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3 BioWares's romances were are complete ****.

Fixed that up for ya

No you didn't. I have no issue with the nature and content of any specific romance. What I object to in Mass Effect is the ridiculous imbalance in favour of content for straight males.

hmmm they got... Ashley, Miranda if romanced in 2, Jack if romanced in 2, Tali if romanced in 2.

Liara, Kelly Chambers, Diana Allers.

Seven potential sex partners for straight male Shepard. Four for lesbian Shepard and only two each for straight female Shepard and gay male Shepard.

Those three are also romancable by FemShep so they don't count

You seem to have missed the "straight" female part.

#32
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 811 messages

AresKeith wrote...
Come on now, Diana Allers is nowhere near worthy of being called a romance 


This. And even including her how is that ratio imbalanced? We're talking about less than 5% of the population here. The numbers in Mass Effect work out quite well for you.

#33
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

Annaka wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3 BioWares's romances were are complete ****.

Fixed that up for ya

No you didn't. I have no issue with the nature and content of any specific romance. What I object to in Mass Effect is the ridiculous imbalance in favour of content for straight males.

hmmm they got... Ashley, Miranda if romanced in 2, Jack if romanced in 2, Tali if romanced in 2.

Liara, Kelly Chambers, Diana Allers.

Seven potential sex partners for straight male Shepard. Four for lesbian Shepard and only two each for straight female Shepard and gay male Shepard.

Those three are also romancable by FemShep so they don't count

You seem to have missed the "straight" female part.

He said straight male

#34
A Crusty Knight Of Colour

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 470 messages

Seraph Cross wrote...

BasilKarlo wrote...

Could we please stop reducing every character to their sexual orientation? It's REALLY starting to anger me.


^ This. How about just focusing on just good quality characters and fixing the mistakes of the previous games rather than pestering Bioware on making the followers avaiable for sex


LRN2BSN.

#35
werewoof

werewoof
  • Members
  • 519 messages

EntropicAngel wrote...

Why? Just because gay and just because Qunari? Is that really all the justification needed for a companion, for an NPC you'll be spending 50 game hours with?

That said, I agree with you on player-sexuality, and honestly if they get rid of that I wouldn't mind this at all. I just dislike the notion of "let's have a gay Qunari just so I can romance him." Seems gimmicky to me.


why not? i think itd be good to have an actual gay companion/li which we havent gotten yet in dragon age, and itd be interesting to see how that would work with qunari culture, what that character might go through, etc. gives us a romance option we havent seen yet and addresses an aspect of the dragon age world that hasnt much been addressed. 

Seraph Cross wrote...

BasilKarlo wrote...

Could we please stop reducing every character to their sexual orientation? It's REALLY starting to anger me.


^ This. How about just focusing on just good quality characters and fixing the mistakes of the previous games rather than pestering Bioware on making the followers avaiable for sex


representation is an important thing, i think its plenty valid. 

Modifié par tiktac, 25 août 2013 - 05:40 .


#36
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3 BioWares's romances were are complete ****.

Fixed that up for ya

No you didn't. I have no issue with the nature and content of any specific romance. What I object to in Mass Effect is the ridiculous imbalance in favour of content for straight males.

hmmm they got... Ashley, Miranda if romanced in 2, Jack if romanced in 2, Tali if romanced in 2.

Liara, Kelly Chambers, Diana Allers.

Seven potential sex partners for straight male Shepard. Four for lesbian Shepard and only two each for straight female Shepard and gay male Shepard.

Those three are also romancable by FemShep so they don't count

Nonsense, of course they count. Them being bisexual doesn't take away from the options for straight males. 

My problem is that straight male gamers get nearly twice as many options as everyone else.

Even if all the characters were made bisexual, you'd still have a problem because there are twice as many romanceable women as there are men.

#37
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3's romances were complete ****.

The Laura one was good. :)

Plaintiff wrote...

My problem is that straight male gamers get nearly twice as many options as everyone else.

Ahh, I thought you meant the quality of the specific romances and not the total imbalance.

Modifié par Maria Caliban, 25 août 2013 - 05:41 .


#38
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

AresKeith wrote...
Come on now, Diana Allers is nowhere near worthy of being called a romance 

I said sex partners.

#39
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Nonsense, of course they count. Them being bisexual doesn't take away from the options for straight males. 

My problem is that straight male gamers get nearly twice as many options as everyone else.

Even if all the characters were made bisexual, you'd still have a problem because there are twice as many romanceable women as there are men.

Those options are not accesible in game for most playthoughs.  If I romanced Jack in 2, I can't romance Miranda/Tali in 3. 

#40
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages
8-1 You're lost! lol

#41
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

tiktac wrote...

why not? i think itd be good to have an actual gay companion/li which we havent gotten yet in dragon age, and itd be interesting to see how that would work with qunari culture, what that character might go through, etc. gives us a romance option we havent seen yet and addresses an aspect of the dragon age world that hasnt much been addressed. 


If you're just doing it so he's gay--if he is defined by his sexuality as another said--it's a bad move.

And as an aside I doubt it matters very much in Qunari culture outside of reproduction. They don't strike me as particularly moralistic. As long as you contribute your two children to the glorious Qun you can probably bang who you want to bang.

#42
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Maria Caliban wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3's romances were complete ****.

The Laura one was good. :)

Laura?

I'm sure they were. The romance content I experienced was high quality, in my opinion. My issue is with the gross imbalance of content in favour of heterosexual men.

#43
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

AresKeith wrote...
Come on now, Diana Allers is nowhere near worthy of being called a romance 

I said sex partners.


First you talk about romance, now you go sex partners

#44
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 190 messages
Gay Qunari?

Sure. I'm all for it. So long as the romance ends with your PC suffering from rectal prolapse and dying from internal bleeding. You might as well be asking for your horse to be a potential LI.

In other words....


Image IPB

#45
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Maria Caliban wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3's romances were complete ****.

The Laura one was good. :)

Laura?

I'm sure they were. The romance content I experienced was high quality, in my opinion. My issue is with the gross imbalance of content in favour of heterosexual men.

The romance content for Miranda and Jack is laughable at best.  Don't act like they got special treatment or anything

#46
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Nonsense, of course they count. Them being bisexual doesn't take away from the options for straight males. 

My problem is that straight male gamers get nearly twice as many options as everyone else.

Even if all the characters were made bisexual, you'd still have a problem because there are twice as many romanceable women as there are men.

Those options are not accesible in game for most playthoughs.  If I romanced Jack in 2, I can't romance Miranda/Tali in 3. 

An irrelevent semantic detail. The difficulty of accessing content is not the issue, the problem is that there is no equivalent for members of the audience who are not straight men.

#47
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
What does its sweat taste like?

#48
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 811 messages

Plaintiff wrote...
I'm sure they were. The romance content I experienced was high quality, in my opinion. My issue is with the gross imbalance of content in favour of heterosexual men.

A gross imbalance which does not exist when you consider the percentages of human population in regards to sexual orientation.

#49
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Maria Caliban wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

ME3's romances were complete ****.

The Laura one was good. :)

Laura?

I'm sure they were. The romance content I experienced was high quality, in my opinion. My issue is with the gross imbalance of content in favour of heterosexual men.

The romance content for Miranda and Jack is laughable at best.  Don't act like they got special treatment or anything

Miranda's was fine. Jack's is the one with issues.

#50
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 291 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Nonsense, of course they count. Them being bisexual doesn't take away from the options for straight males. 

My problem is that straight male gamers get nearly twice as many options as everyone else.

Even if all the characters were made bisexual, you'd still have a problem because there are twice as many romanceable women as there are men.

Those options are not accesible in game for most playthoughs.  If I romanced Jack in 2, I can't romance Miranda/Tali in 3. 

An irrelevent semantic detail. The difficulty of accessing content is not the issue, the problem is that there is no equivalent for members of the audience who are not straight men.

That's not what semantics are