Don't preach inclusivity on one hand and exclude people on the other. Selective inclusivty is not a thing.
Well, if you consider us hypocrites I encourage you to respond in manner you feel is appropriate.
Don't preach inclusivity on one hand and exclude people on the other. Selective inclusivty is not a thing.
Allan Schumacher wrote...
Don't preach inclusivity on one hand and exclude people on the other. Selective inclusivty is not a thing.
Well, if you consider us hypocrites I encourage you to respond in manner you feel is appropriate.
Modifié par Mimitochan, 29 août 2013 - 07:04 .
Guest_Puddi III_*
Filament wrote...
A plus that I think has kind of been overlooked or taken for granted (or maybe it's just obvious) is that it's an import system across all platforms. I think that's pretty neat. I mean, necessary I guess, because that's the whole point of going to all this trouble, to accommodate next gen. But it also accommodates "switching sides" and buying a different version and stuff. I know a lot of people who had the PS version and then bought a PC version later, for instance.
I dunno, I think that's neat. Unless I'm mistaken.
Icinix wrote...
No it is neat, its excellent. If it all pans out with the options its intended it will be great.
Multi platform saves wherever you go etc, customised saves etc.
Its just a bit of an irk if the keep remains the only option, and remains only online.
Everything else about it is fantastic sounding though.
Sopa de Gato wrote...
I'm still a little iffy on this, if because it seems playing the game and retaining your save becomes a little useless - anyone can get whatever they want without having to do anything for it. It's handy, granted, but at the same time it's a little..depressing?
Sopa de Gato wrote...
I'm still a little iffy on this, if because it seems playing the game and retaining your save becomes a little useless - anyone can get whatever they want without having to do anything for it. It's handy, granted, but at the same time it's a little..depressing?
I game should be played for the fun off playing it, the thought of playing a game just thinking about creating a save for the sequel seems much more depressing, espacially the thought off some people (I am sure you are not the only one) thinking off playing a game as "useless" when it doesnt give you an import save for another one feels weird to me.Sopa de Gato wrote...
I'm still a little iffy on this, if because it seems playing the game and retaining your save becomes a little useless - anyone can get whatever they want without having to do anything for it. It's handy, granted, but at the same time it's a little..depressing?
ravensmight wrote...
I just hope we will be able to tailor all are decisions not just a few key ones because otherwise i can see people freaking out
JoeHegarty wrote...
DarthSliver wrote...
JoeHegarty wrote...
fchopin wrote...
JoeHegarty wrote...
Something my team is involved in has been announced! Woo.
Does that mean you will answer some of our questions?
I can answer your question about whether this is optional: Absolutely.
You are in no way required to use the keep to create a state for your playthrough. You can use the default canon without any problems.
However, it really is quite nifty. You can for instance see the ripple effects of a change from DAO on the subsequent data.
Can you essentially use this to create a background from scratch so we dont have to always playthrough the previous titles?
Yes! You can create an entirely new history from scratch, with many many choices. The Keep will ensure all your choices are compatible and don't conflict.
You can do this as many times as you want, and whenever you want. Fire up a new DAI game and your changes will be in effect in your new playthrough.
Nashimura wrote...
I do have what i think might be an important question for some, on consoles will a gold account or a playstation plus be required for this feature to work? Because i don't have any use for a paid online account, so i don't have one just a free silver account.
And I can finally match one of my Orlesian Warden playthroughs with one of my US Warden playthroughs, which existed in the same time/space continuum only in my headcanon!Jonathan Seagull wrote...
But the idea of being able to play Awakening in isolation as the Orlesion WC so that I can get to know him, while keeping my canon unchanged otherwise, is very appealing.
Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...
Agreed. The online bit doesn't bother me much since, hey, I'm gonna have to bloody well connect to the internet anyway for DRM (*insert eyeroll here*), but connectivity requirements definitely leave some gamers in the lurch. :/
I mean, my internet was out for a while the other day so I figured I'd install one of my nice single player games. I ended up being more than a little astouded as to how many boxed games I own require the internet for me to install, let alone play them. Thank goodness I own games that predate online DRM, I guess.
But that's off-topic. As far as the Keep is concerned, I'd be curious if the devs would be kind enough to disclose exactly why they've decided to have it as a web-based feature separate from the game. Unless it's planned to be in the game after a web-based beta?
Foopydoopydoo wrote...
Icinix wrote...
Foopydoopydoo wrote...
Allan Schumacher wrote...
So I'll have to connect to the internet every time I want to start a new game?
There's a good chance that that may be the case. Would ultimately depend on how we end up delivering it, things like feedback and so forth.
Ugh. <_<
This irks me a bit too - but if we can create world states that act as a new game save game file, i'm hoping I can load up all my characters in one hit - and no need to access the keep again after that.
While I absolutely ****ing hate the idea of having to connect my game to the internet for my decisions to carry over what really gets to me is the total first-worldness of this decision. Internet is not universal. It is not a basic human right. You actually do get oodles and oodles of people who can afford to buy games but not afford an internet connection. Decisions like this just smack of presumed privelige "Why is this such a big deal? Who doesn't have an internet connection these days?"
Don't preach inclusivity on one hand and exclude people on the other. Selective inclusivty is not a thing.