204 réponses à ce sujet

[JasonPogo]

This is taken from the Game Informer Dragon Age coverage. http://www.gameinfor...PostPageIndex=1

So dose this confirm that Cassandra, Varric, and Vivienne are NOT romanceable?

[Volus Warlord]

It confirms absolutely nothing.

[David7204]

No.

[Ailith Tycane]

Uh no...I think it means BioWare has not announced any of the characters that can be romanced yet...

[dreamgazer]

It confirms a lack of confirmation of anything.

[devSin]

It wouldn't be surprising. Cassandra is perhaps too integral to be romanced, Varric is off limits, now and forever, and Vivienne is clearly already in love with that hat.

Without clicking on that link, I'd say it's more likely they meant to say that BioWare has not yet said which characters can be romanced, but I still won't be surprised if none of these three are made available. There are six other companions who have yet to be officially revealed (even if we all know who most of them are already).

Modifié par devSin, 28 août 2013 - 08:20 .

[Bekkael]

JasonPogo wrote...

This is taken from the Game Informer Dragon Age coverage. http://www.gameinfor...PostPageIndex=1

So dose this confirm that Cassandra, Varric, and Vivienne are NOT romanceable?

I wouldn't think so. It's just naturally too early for them to want to spoil who will be romanceable. I don't know about the other two, but I would be shocked if they didn't have Cassandra available to be romanced.

[thats1evildude]

It confirms that fans tend to read too much into innocuous statements.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 28 août 2013 - 08:19 .

[Eagle Pusuit]

I think it means that Bioware hasn't announced which characters are romance-able.

[In Exile]

Ailith430 wrote...

Uh no...I think it means BioWare has not announced any of the characters that can be romanced yet...

You mean, a statement means literally the thing it says it means? 

[Ailith Tycane]

In Exile wrote...

Ailith430 wrote...

Uh no...I think it means BioWare has not announced any of the characters that can be romanced yet...

You mean, a statement means literally the thing it says it means? 

lol I know, crazy

[Bekkael]

Shadobald wrote...

I think it means that Bioware hasn't announced which characters are romance-able.

Actually, thinking back to before DA2 released, I don't think they ever did confirm most of the romances but just let people discover it themselves.

[DatOneFanboy]

Did u even read the Gameinformer holy fk? They Develop romance's after they are pleased with character's.

[franciscoamell]

Bekkael wrote...

Shadobald wrote...

I think it means that Bioware hasn't announced which characters are romance-able.

Actually, thinking back to before DA2 released, I don't think they ever did confirm most of the romances but just let people discover it themselves.

Nah, they made a post here on the bsn revealing the LIs on Valentine's day.

[Sylvianus]

We knew in february which character would be romanceable and the game was released in march. That might give you an idea how much time you'll wait before any confirmation.

Modifié par Sylvianus, 28 août 2013 - 08:28 .

[Bekkael]

franciscoamell wrote...

Bekkael wrote...

Shadobald wrote...

I think it means that Bioware hasn't announced which characters are romance-able.

Actually, thinking back to before DA2 released, I don't think they ever did confirm most of the romances but just let people discover it themselves.

Nah, they made a post here on the bsn revealing the LIs on Valentine's day.

All of them? For some reason, I only remember them telling about Fenris. Or maybe it was the fact that everyone was bi was what they never officially confirmed and just let people discover?

[Wulfram]

I'd guess it's suspposed to mean that they have not announced who can be romanced, rather than that you can't romance those announced so far.

[dreamgazer]

In Exile wrote...

Ailith430 wrote...

Uh no...I think it means BioWare has not announced any of the characters that can be romanced yet...

You mean, a statement means literally the thing it says it means?

What?!

[DarkKnightHolmes]

I hope they announce them soon so the forum can move on from "[Insert random person] for LI!!!!!"

[Sylvianus]

Bekkael wrote...

JasonPogo wrote...

This is taken from the Game Informer Dragon Age coverage. http://www.gameinfor...PostPageIndex=1

So dose this confirm that Cassandra, Varric, and Vivienne are NOT romanceable?

I wouldn't think so. It's just naturally too early for them to want to spoil who will be romanceable. I don't know about the other two, but I would be shocked if they didn't have Cassandra available to be romanced.

Why would you be shocked ?

Modifié par Sylvianus, 28 août 2013 - 08:33 .

[Bekkael]

DarkKnightHolmes wrote...

I hope they announce them soon so the forum can move on from "[Insert random person] for LI!!!!!"

I hate to disappoint, but I don't think the forums ever really move on from that.

[devSin]

Ailith430 wrote...

lol I know, crazy

You're making the same mistake the author of the article presumably made.

If the characters haven't been announced, then we have not yet seen those characters (and therefore the characters we have seen are not romance options).

If they haven't announced which characters can be romanced, then any of the characters who have already been announced could still be romance options (they simply haven't announced romances yet).

The reason this thread exists is valid. The author of the article done goofed if what they truly meant to say was that BioWare simply hasn't announced romance options yet. They wrote a statement (which you then repeated) that doesn't actually say what they meant to say.

Modifié par devSin, 28 août 2013 - 08:33 .

[Bekkael]

Sylvianus wrote...

Bekkael wrote...

JasonPogo wrote...

This is taken from the Game Informer Dragon Age coverage. http://www.gameinfor...PostPageIndex=1

So dose this confirm that Cassandra, Varric, and Vivienne are NOT romanceable?

I wouldn't think so. It's just naturally too early for them to want to spoil who will be romanceable. I don't know about the other two, but I would be shocked if they didn't have Cassandra available to be romanced.

Why would you be shocked ?

Because she has been asked for for so long, and BioWare usually likes to have an attractive female to dangle before male gamers in the hope that they will bite (Morrigan, Isabela).

[Sir George Parr]

All it confirms is that the developers aren't in a position to issue a confirmation as to which of the companions are going to be confirmed as romance options for the PC. As its still to be resolved by developers having an arm wrestling contest in the office tomorrow afternoon.