204 réponses à ce sujet

[Cainhurst Crow]

David7204 wrote...

I'm glad to here that nobody thinks that's the only purpose. So what are the other purpose or purposes, again?

Are we there yet?

[Shadow Fox]

Foshizzlin wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Great. We have people admitting sex appeal isn't all about marketing. We're making progress. Let's keep going. What other purpose is there?

Why do you people keep responding to and feeding this fellow? It's an amusing sight, but just stop already, and he'll get bored.

I think he actually believes what he's saying though.
Cause it's funny.

[saMoorai]

J. Reezy wrote...

Bekkael wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Lots of silly nonsense to try to get attention.

^ This serves no purpose but to give certain types of people a happy in their pants. <_<

This guy is nothing but a troll...stop feeding it!

C'mon son, why you post that abomination?

It could be worse. They could be posting the picture of the Banshee. 

[GreyLycanTrope]

David7204 wrote...

Great. We have people admitting sex appeal isn't all about marketing. We're making progress. Let's keep going. What other purpose is there? Why are characters attractive in stories if not to bring in attention?

Not resitricted to marketing. Sex appeal is used to generate interest in characters, when some of these characters end up in adverts they simultaniously generate interest in the product.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

I'm glad to here that nobody thinks that's the only purpose. So what are the other purpose or purposes, again?

What are they David?

[Bekkael]

J. Reezy wrote...

Bekkael wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Lots of silly nonsense to try to get attention.

^ This serves no purpose but to give certain types of people a happy in their pants. <_<

This guy is nothing but a troll...stop feeding it!

C'mon son, why you post that abomination?

Take it up with the ME3 guys, sweety. The scariest thing is that someone actually spent time sculping/drawing that ******. I cannot begin to express the depth of my traumatization upon seeing it.

[David7204]

I'm unsure why people are so hostile to this. It's simply confronting the reality that characters in fiction are very often quite attractive.

Surely nobody here seriously belives attractiveness plays no role in their perception of characters? In fiction and in real life? 

All I'm doing is acknowledge there's more to this than 'developers are lazy and stupid so they give characters bewbs cause 13 year old boys love bwebs.' Is that so threatening to people?

Modifié par David7204, 28 août 2013 - 10:15 .

[Cainhurst Crow]

David7204 wrote...

I'm unsure why people are so hostile to this. It's simply confronting the reality that characters in fiction are very often quite attractive.

Are we there yet?

[WildOrchid]

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

EDI is fan service and fetish fuel.

 Yep, the damn cameltoe proves it.

David, care to explain why there was a cameltoe on your precious robot, then?

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

I'm unsure why people are so hostile to this. It's simply confronting the reality that characters in fiction are very often quite attractive.

You're very limited with the fiction you're exposed to then.

[mupp3tz]

6/7 pages of this thread is just a pointless argument and thread derailment.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Foshizzlin wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

I'm unsure why people are so hostile to this. It's simply confronting the reality that characters in fiction are very often quite attractive.

You're very limited with the fiction you're exposed to then.

Stop replying to him already, gosh.

I can't help it. It satisfies my morbid sense of self-superior- DAMMIT! Now I'm even starting to talk like David!

[dreamgazer]

David7204 wrote...

All I'm doing is acknowledge there's more to this than 'developers are lazy and stupid so they give characters bewbs cause 13 year old boys love bwebs.' Is that threatening to people?

No, it's not threatening to people.

It's also not exactly true. Base titillation is assuredly one of their big drivers.

[David7204]

WildOrchid wrote...

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

EDI is fan service and fetish fuel.

 Yep, the damn cameltoe proves it.

David, care to explain why there was a cameltoe on your precious robot, then?

Hardly. The average player would never see that if they didn't look.

If EDI was 'fan service' and 'fetish fuel,' why was she not made a love interest? That seems like a fairly easy and obvious attempt to cash out on that if it was true.

Why was her dialogue concerning sex clearly written to be endearing and humerous instead of seductive?

Why was she absent from advertising? Why wouldn't the developers flaunt her if she was only made attractive to bring in attention?

Modifié par David7204, 28 août 2013 - 10:20 .

[saMoorai]

M U P P 3 T Z wrote...

6/7 pages of this thread is just a pointless argument and thread derailment.

I know; isn't it great? 

[DarkKnightHolmes]

Oh God, ME3 is leaking here. Mods lock this thing already.

[Inquisitor Recon]

EDI ******, did this thread need that addition?

[David7204]

dreamgazer wrote...

David7204 wrote...

All I'm doing is acknowledge there's more to this than 'developers are lazy and stupid so they give characters bewbs cause 13 year old boys love bwebs.' Is that threatening to people?

No, it's not threatening to people.

It's also not exactly true. Base titillation is assuredly one of their big drivers.

You're going to have to define 'titillation' for me. Is every attractive character in fiction 'titillation'?

[Cainhurst Crow]

Waiting for the lock.