204 réponses à ce sujet

[dreamgazer]

David7204 wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

David7204 wrote...

All I'm doing is acknowledge there's more to this than 'developers are lazy and stupid so they give characters bewbs cause 13 year old boys love bwebs.' Is that threatening to people?

No, it's not threatening to people.

It's also not exactly true. Base titillation is assuredly one of their big drivers.

You're going to have to define 'titillation' for me. Is every attractive character in fiction 'titillation'?

Yes, that's precisely what I said, David. 

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

WildOrchid wrote...

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

EDI is fan service and fetish fuel.

 Yep, the damn cameltoe proves it.

David, care to explain why there was a cameltoe on your precious robot, then?

Hardly. The average player would never see that if they didn't look.

If EDI was 'fan service' and 'fetish fuel,' why was she not made a love interest? That seems like a fairly easy and obvious attempt to cash out on that if it was true.

Why was her dialogue concerning sex clearly written to be endearing and humerous instead of seductive?

Why was she absent from advertising? Why wouldn't the developers flaunt her if she was only made attractive to bring in attention?

Because she was exactly that?

[Shadow Fox]

Foshizzlin wrote...

J. Reezy wrote...

Foshizzlin wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

I'm unsure why people are so hostile to this. It's simply confronting the reality that characters in fiction are very often quite attractive.

You're very limited with the fiction you're exposed to then.

Stop replying to him already, gosh. You kids must not understand what 'trolling' is. It's done in other ways besides saying "LOL UMAD"; some trolling is more inconspicuous, but whether you believe me or not, that's up to you, I suppose.

What if he's not a troll?

Hah, that's quite funny.

Oh, you're not joking? Well, gauge all of his posts together, his love to bring irrelevant and controversial topics into unrelated topics, his love of carrying on derailing arguments, and you have either a troll, an idiot, or both.

I used to think the same of Xill.

[David7204]

Thank you for the pointless gif. So again, why don't you define titillation for me?

[AresKeith]

Why are you actively trying to derail threads David?

[Cainhurst Crow]

Still waiting....

[Bekkael]

Inquisitor Recon wrote...

EDI ******, did this thread need that addition?

As a responsible community member, I felt it was my duty to include it. It's a cautionary tale to the DAI devs.

[Shadow Fox]

AresKeith wrote...

Why are you actively trying to derail threads David?

Troll or deluded.

[RedArmyShogun]

Oh snap David be mad.

Also why in the hell would a robot have ******?

[David7204]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Because she was exactly that?

I'm looking for where it says on this page that EDI was made attractive on the basis of being 'fetish fuel' and 'fan service.' Could you point that out to me?

[dreamgazer]

David7204 wrote...

Thank you for the pointless gif. So again, why don't you define titillation for me?

Nah.

You go ahead for us, though! You're ever so close to making your point ... whatever it is.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Still waiting....

STOP!

I wanna go home! Take off this uniform and leave the show!

But I'm waiting in this cell because I have to know!

Have I been guilty all this time?

[Shadow Fox]

RedArmyShogun wrote...

Oh snap David be mad.

Also why in the hell would a robot have ******?

Same reason Sylvari have genitals.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

David7204 wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Because she was exactly that?

I'm looking for where it says on this page that EDI was made attractive on the basis of being 'fetish fuel' and 'fan service.' Could you point that out to me?

No. Maybe you shouldn't use intentionally loaded phrases and literal requests for your own statements that you yourself made, or that others made as direct correlation and affirmation for your own floundering argument.

[spirosz]

David7204 wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Because she was exactly that?

I'm looking for where it says on this page that EDI was made attractive on the basis of being 'fetish fuel' and 'fan service.' Could you point that out to me?

Answer me this David, what other viable reason is there to have ****** on an A.I? 

[WildOrchid]

David7204 wrote...


Hardly. The average player would never see that if they didn't look.

If EDI was 'fan service' and 'fetish fuel,' why was she not made a love interest? That seems like a fairly easy and obvious attempt to cash out on that if it was true.

Why was her dialogue concerning sex clearly written to be endearing and humerous instead of seductive?

Why was she absent from advertising? Why wouldn't the developers flaunt her if she was only made attractive to bring in attention?

You still didn't answer my question. Why she had a cameltoe, if EDI is what you say?

[David7204]

dreamgazer wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Thank you for the pointless gif. So again, why don't you define titillation for me?

Nah.

You go ahead for us, though! You're ever so close to making your point ... whatever it is.

So you would agree that characters in BioWare games are attractive on the basis on 'titillation' but not all other fiction. I'm just trying to understand what you think the difference is.

[mupp3tz]

This reads like taking a poli-sci course in college with a professor who keeps asking the students to get in touch with their meta, when all you wanted to know was if you get a course break in the middle or not.

[David7204]

WildOrchid wrote...

David7204 wrote...


Hardly. The average player would never see that if they didn't look.

If EDI was 'fan service' and 'fetish fuel,' why was she not made a love interest? That seems like a fairly easy and obvious attempt to cash out on that if it was true.

Why was her dialogue concerning sex clearly written to be endearing and humerous instead of seductive?

Why was she absent from advertising? Why wouldn't the developers flaunt her if she was only made attractive to bring in attention?

You still didn't answer my question. Why she had a cameltoe, if EDI is what you say?

Can you answer mine?

[Maria Caliban]

spirosz wrote...

Answer me this David, what other viable reason is there to have ****** on an A.I? 

Increased surface area means better heat dissipation.