This is from my last PUG session:

Not even a bad team: the second place guy was an experienced and generally helpful player. The two of us ended up doing a few of the objectives mostly on our own while the bottom two players ran off trying to score points. (Hey, at least they gelled and eventually made a cameo at the hack circles.) The spread proportion, if not necessarily the numbers, is fairly common for my PUGs. I don't 'carry,' but if I do go down early in a wave, there's a fairly high chance of failure.
This is from one of my last sessions with a BSNer:

So you can see a difference. Generally, whenever I play with a recognizable BSN player, the scores look something like that. They're killing things before I even see the enemies.
Two things:
First, BSNers typically are really good. There have been very few times I've been hugely impressed with a random player that I didn't know or later discover was from BSN. There's a clear demarcation in knowledge and often ability between randoms and BSNers.
Second, whenever I play with BSNers, I'm reminded that there's a level of ability I can't really fathom. To use a sports analogy, it's like Jon Fitch fighting his way up with a win streak of 16 straight using a smart, gritty style and technical knowledge to reach his title shot, despite limited physical abilities - and then getting totally dominated by GSP, who has both knowledge and natural talent. I mostly know how this game works, and I can pull off headshots, use soft cover and check my surroundings - but that's not the same as being legitimately good at ME3.
When I read this forum, with its Gold solos and its irritation with PUGs, I often wonder how many other BSNers are like me: competent, but not great. There must be others out there. If lurkers have a thread, I want one, too.
Modifié par torudoom, 31 août 2013 - 01:33 .





Retour en haut







