I'm curious as to how party balance will work in this new game. Will it be possible to have certain combinations and not have the game be ridiculously hard?
In the demo, they used the classic set-up: Warrior PC, Warrior (Cassandra), Rogue (Varric), and Mage (Vivienne). Personally, I tend to go WRMM with my PC as a mage. But will mages be so squishy that you really need to capitalize on having multiple warriors?
I'm not overly concerned about this, I'm just curious as to what everybody thinks.
Party Balance/Building Your Party
Débuté par
andar91
, sept. 02 2013 05:04
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:06
Knight of Dane
-
- Members
- 7 451 messages
As long as I can have any combination of four classes I want then I'll be happy.
Had tons of fun stomping through the Brecillian forest with Sten, Oghren and Al-boy at once. Was also cool to four-rogue-party the high dragon in Dragon Age 2.
Had tons of fun stomping through the Brecillian forest with Sten, Oghren and Al-boy at once. Was also cool to four-rogue-party the high dragon in Dragon Age 2.
#3
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:10
Ozida
-
- Members
- 833 messages
One thing I still do not get is how Cullen (if he is indeed included based on original screen-shots) will be in the same group with mage companions or mage PC? I get they need a templar warrior, but that will be an interesting... relationship.
Back on topic, though, based on information we get, the party seems to be well-balanced, IMHO. Personally, I would go either Warrior/Mage PC, one warrior, one rogue and then someone else. Have to have a rogue in a party to open locked objects.
Back on topic, though, based on information we get, the party seems to be well-balanced, IMHO. Personally, I would go either Warrior/Mage PC, one warrior, one rogue and then someone else. Have to have a rogue in a party to open locked objects.
Modifié par Ozida, 02 septembre 2013 - 05:22 .
#4
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:15
mupp3tz
-
- Members
- 2 469 messages
I will probably play a rogue, so my party will likely be WMM. With no regen, I think I'll feel even more obligated to drag a healer mage around.
#5
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:21
Wulfram
-
- Members
- 18 950 messages
They'll probably be fairly big downsides to not having one of each class. The exploration skills seem like a way to give every class the equivalent of the rogue's traps and locks skill.
And healers will be likely be necessary with no health regen.
And healers will be likely be necessary with no health regen.
#6
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:23
mupp3tz
-
- Members
- 2 469 messages
Wulfram wrote...
They'll probably be fairly big downsides to not having one of each class. The exploration skills seem like a way to give every class the equivalent of the rogue's traps and locks skill.
And healers will be likely be necessary with no health regen.
Argh. Forgot about that little nuance. Mandatory: 1 healer mage, 1 lockpicking rogue.. because ain't nobody got time to double back for all those chests you come across.
Modifié par M U P P 3 T Z, 02 septembre 2013 - 05:23 .
#7
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:30
Cespar
-
- Members
- 2 954 messages
I will be going with a rogue and I usually go with nothing but non-humans of the group. So here hoping for a non-human mage again. Varric always going to stay in my party, so that is two rogue right there.
#8
Posté 02 septembre 2013 - 05:31
In Exile
-
- Members
- 28 738 messages
You didn't need to use warriors in DA:O or DA2. I used warriors because I thought they had pretty good damage builds, but I certainly never wasted talents on aggro traits in DA:O because they were irrelevant.
