<3MegaSovereign wrote...
The Geth weren't fully evolved AIs and they were still capable of throwing the Quarians out of their own turf.
There are inherent advantages of species that aren't held back by organic flesh. There really shouldn't be a need for the writers to try too hard to justify this.
Calling this a "problem" is subjective because this is really within the realm of evolution ("cosmic imperative" as Javik calls it). Organics will have to sink or swim. The Catalyst's solution seems stupid in the first place because there isn't really any objective issues with two factions being inherently different.
The death of synthetics is a sensible consequence of Destroy
#76
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 02:18
#77
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 07:14
jtav wrote...
It's a matter of theme. Remember Sovereign? "You develop along the paths we desire." Reaper tech is presented as something that stifles the innovative spirit of organics, even as it broadens the minds of synthetics. You want to be free? Well, you're going to have to be free of everything.
That's nonsense. There's nothing intrinsic to reaper tech that is stifling. Freedom means being free to take and use whatever tech you want
#78
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 09:25
#79
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 09:33
#80
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 10:05
TheMyron wrote...
If thesalvationsolution for organics is to be liquefied alive so that one's Precious Bodily Fluids can be used to build a new Reaper, then what would have been the Final Solution for the Geth according to the Reapers?
Simple extermination, I son't think synthetics can be harvested. The Reapers purge both organic and synthetic races that are too advanced. Harby merely calls them a 'nuisance'.
#81
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 10:27
jtav is right. Reaper tech is a form of control over organics. Always has been. Pretty symbolic, really.wright1978 wrote...
jtav wrote...
It's a matter of theme. Remember Sovereign? "You develop along the paths we desire." Reaper tech is presented as something that stifles the innovative spirit of organics, even as it broadens the minds of synthetics. You want to be free? Well, you're going to have to be free of everything.
That's nonsense. There's nothing intrinsic to reaper tech that is stifling. Freedom means being free to take and use whatever tech you want
All tech is based off of it. Nihilus says as such.
#82
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 10:38
iakus wrote...
EDI and the geth reverting to ealier pre-Reaper states might make sense. But their unavoidable deaths makes no sense at all. They are all different kinds of AIs from different areas and using different tech by different species. A universal "off button" for all of them is completely unreasonable.
Sure it does. Edi and the Geth are essentially reaper. Destroy gets rid of all things Reaper. It isn't "the geth have reaper code" it's "The geth ARE reaper code".
I think it is perfectly logical that destroy would also destroy synthetics that are essentially reaper. It is no different then how the wave also destroys husks.
#83
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 10:43
HYR 2.0 wrote...
It's not really sensible. Between the geth, the Reapers, and EDI, it's targetting three very different things. That they're all AI is the only thing they have in common, but how does a wave of energy tell apart AI from... everything else in its wake?
Reaper.
The wave targets husks because they're reaper tech
The Wave targets the Relays because they're reaper tech
The wave targets Reapers because... they're reapers
The wave targets EDi and the Geth because they're Reaper by products
In the original ending the Catalyst even implies that Shepard will also be targeted due to his/hers synthetic parts. Those Synthetic parts are reaper.
Destroy Destroys everything that can tace its origins back to Reapers.
Modifié par Eterna5, 03 septembre 2013 - 10:44 .
#84
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 10:55
Mcfly616 wrote...
jtav is right. Reaper tech is a form of control over organics. Always has been. Pretty symbolic, really.wright1978 wrote...
jtav wrote...
It's a matter of theme. Remember Sovereign? "You develop along the paths we desire." Reaper tech is presented as something that stifles the innovative spirit of organics, even as it broadens the minds of synthetics. You want to be free? Well, you're going to have to be free of everything.
That's nonsense. There's nothing intrinsic to reaper tech that is stifling. Freedom means being free to take and use whatever tech you want
All tech is based off of it. Nihilus says as such.
Assuming direct [posthumous] control.
Modifié par KaiserShep, 03 septembre 2013 - 10:55 .
#85
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 11:02
Eterna5 wrote...
iakus wrote...
EDI and the geth reverting to ealier pre-Reaper states might make sense. But their unavoidable deaths makes no sense at all. They are all different kinds of AIs from different areas and using different tech by different species. A universal "off button" for all of them is completely unreasonable.
Sure it does. Edi and the Geth are essentially reaper. Destroy gets rid of all things Reaper. It isn't "the geth have reaper code" it's "The geth ARE reaper code".
I think it is perfectly logical that destroy would also destroy synthetics that are essentially reaper. It is no different then how the wave also destroys husks.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it true that the body that EDI uses was actually made using reaper tech? I seem to remember seeing some logs when attacking the Cerberus home but I'm not sure if I remember that right.
#86
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 11:17
EDI already had Reaper tech before she ever infiltrated the EVA body.YourFleshIsMine wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
iakus wrote...
EDI and the geth reverting to ealier pre-Reaper states might make sense. But their unavoidable deaths makes no sense at all. They are all different kinds of AIs from different areas and using different tech by different species. A universal "off button" for all of them is completely unreasonable.
Sure it does. Edi and the Geth are essentially reaper. Destroy gets rid of all things Reaper. It isn't "the geth have reaper code" it's "The geth ARE reaper code".
I think it is perfectly logical that destroy would also destroy synthetics that are essentially reaper. It is no different then how the wave also destroys husks.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it true that the body that EDI uses was actually made using reaper tech? I seem to remember seeing some logs when attacking the Cerberus home but I'm not sure if I remember that right.
#87
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 12:12
but cerberus arnt working for the reapers.Mcfly616 wrote...
EDI already had Reaper tech before she ever infiltrated the EVA body.YourFleshIsMine wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
iakus wrote...
EDI and the geth reverting to ealier pre-Reaper states might make sense. But their unavoidable deaths makes no sense at all. They are all different kinds of AIs from different areas and using different tech by different species. A universal "off button" for all of them is completely unreasonable.
Sure it does. Edi and the Geth are essentially reaper. Destroy gets rid of all things Reaper. It isn't "the geth have reaper code" it's "The geth ARE reaper code".
I think it is perfectly logical that destroy would also destroy synthetics that are essentially reaper. It is no different then how the wave also destroys husks.
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it true that the body that EDI uses was actually made using reaper tech? I seem to remember seeing some logs when attacking the Cerberus home but I'm not sure if I remember that right.
#88
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 12:24
But from a purely logistic perspective? nope
Also where is my reunion scene??
#89
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 12:26
crimzontearz wrote...
Also where is my reunion scene??
In the pile with all the other boring uneeded cliches.
#90
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 12:33
#91
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 12:39
oh you mean like the Adam and Eve reference? Yep, seems legitEterna5 wrote...
crimzontearz wrote...
Also where is my reunion scene??
In the pile with all the other boring uneeded cliches.
Also, "need" is by definition a subjective concept, I am glad YOU thought it to be not needed but do not presume you can make that call for everyone.
#92
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 01:18
Eterna5 wrote...
iakus wrote...
EDI and the geth reverting to ealier pre-Reaper states might make sense. But their unavoidable deaths makes no sense at all. They are all different kinds of AIs from different areas and using different tech by different species. A universal "off button" for all of them is completely unreasonable.
Sure it does. Edi and the Geth are essentially reaper. Destroy gets rid of all things Reaper. It isn't "the geth have reaper code" it's "The geth ARE reaper code".
I think it is perfectly logical that destroy would also destroy synthetics that are essentially reaper. It is no different then how the wave also destroys husks.
Except they're not.
Both EDI and the geth were developed with technology from this cycle. They were only later augmented by reaper technology.
By saying they need to die in Destroy is like saying the relays need to rupture and kill the systems they were in because they benefited from a relay network the Reapers put in place.
#93
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 01:35
#94
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 01:43
jtav wrote...
The geth do need to die. The impression I got from Rannoch with the VI was that they took such a hit to brainpower in the initial attack that their existence as a sapient species required the Reaper code going forward. And EDI is not EDI without the Reaper parts.
From Legion itself I got no such impression. The geth sim[ply got desperate to survive and took the Saren way out.
And EDI is still EDI without reaper upgrades. Just not as brilliant. AI personalities develop just like human minds do: through experience.
#95
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 01:56
Modifié par Necanor, 03 septembre 2013 - 01:58 .
#96
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 03:08
iakus wrote...
jtav wrote...
The geth do need to die. The impression I got from Rannoch with the VI was that they took such a hit to brainpower in the initial attack that their existence as a sapient species required the Reaper code going forward. And EDI is not EDI without the Reaper parts.
From Legion itself I got no such impression. The geth sim[ply got desperate to survive and took the Saren way out.
And EDI is still EDI without reaper upgrades. Just not as brilliant. AI personalities develop just like human minds do: through experience.
Yeah the Geth feared the loss of their sentience from further losses after the initial attack, not that they were no longer viable after it.
#97
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 03:25
Take that, stupid robots.
#98
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 03:48
If the geth want to move forward as a species after the destruction of the Dyson Sphere all they have to do is make more geth programs. It's not permanent.jtav wrote...
The geth do need to die. The impression I got from Rannoch with the VI was that they took such a hit to brainpower in the initial attack that their existence as a sapient species required the Reaper code going forward.
Why, do the scraps of Sovereign that she's partly composed off affect her personality?And EDI is not EDI without the Reaper parts.
#99
Guest_Imanol de Tafalla_*
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 03:56
Guest_Imanol de Tafalla_*
#100
Posté 03 septembre 2013 - 03:57
wright1978 wrote...
jtav wrote...
It's a matter of theme. Remember Sovereign? "You develop along the paths we desire." Reaper tech is presented as something that stifles the innovative spirit of organics, even as it broadens the minds of synthetics. You want to be free? Well, you're going to have to be free of everything.
That's nonsense. There's nothing intrinsic to reaper tech that is stifling. Freedom means being free to take and use whatever tech you want
thats not how its presented. its put forth in the story as being negative. sov explains this to you in me1...you follow our way you get stuck with our way





Retour en haut





