166 réponses à ce sujet

[cJohnOne]

Why do you think they put them in?  Maybe to appeal to skyrim players? 

Modifié par cJohnOne, 04 septembre 2013 - 04:38 .

[Tommyspa]

Cause some gamers think they are fun. Simply put.

[n7stormrunner]

I'm going with it's action rpg with some tactical elements

[Trafalgar-Law]

cJohnOne wrote...

Why do you think they put them in?  May be to appeal to skyrim players? 

Nope, they're trying to get the Call of Duty crowd . . . somehow.

I sincerely hope they take the dodge roll feature out. It defeats the purpose of DEX, CON and armor. Unless there are some limitations, I can easily play as a warrior, pump everything into STR and solo the game with ease.

[Kaiser of Hearts]

What's an action rpg element?

[David7204]

Fun?

[Ailith Tycane]

Because they're more fun

[cJohnOne]

Kaiser of Hearts wrote...

What's an action rpg element?

what's an action rpg?

[Vapaa]

Kaiser of Hearts wrote...

What's an action rpg element?

A buzzword beloved by elitist players

[cJohnOne]

I didn't know I was an elitist player. ha, ha.

[thats1evildude]

Umm ... because Dragon Age is an action RPG?

Is this one of those times where you guys are playing a different version of the games than I am?

[n7stormrunner]

cJohnOne wrote...

I didn't know I was an elitist player. ha, ha.

have you ever meant a elitist who thought  they were elitist 

[ImperatorMortis]

 Because some people like that, and its good to have variety. What does it matter anyway? From what was shown the tactical combat is pretty damn good. 

Also 3rd person combat =/= appealing to Skyrim players. 

[upsettingshorts]

Because why not do both if you can?

If you like over the shoulder gameplay, use it. Don't go on the forums and demand to know why they bothered with the tactical cam.

If you like the tactical cam, use it. Don't go on the forums and demand to know why they bothered with the over the shoulder cam.

Or if you're like me, use both when I feel like using them. Then come on the forums and look at people who have inflexibly strong feelings about it like they're space aliens.

Do the Bethesda and/or Obsidian forums have threads of people asking why they bothered to use VATS or include iron sights?

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 04 septembre 2013 - 06:01 .

[Zanallen]

Is there a good reason to not have them?

[cJohnOne]

Well it's my bed time see you later,all.

You don't think they will get some skyrim fans?

[cJohnOne]

Zanallen wrote...

Is there a good reason to not have them?

I'd say yes but that's not the question.

[Zanallen]

cJohnOne wrote...

I'd say yes but that's not the question.

Other than personal preference, I can't really think of any reason to include or remove so-called "action RPG" elements. So, instead of asking Bioware to justify themselves, why not just say "Hey, I don't like this action RPG nonsense" and be done with it?

[dduane o]

trafalgar law: I sincerely hope they take the dodge roll feature out. It defeats the purpose of DEX, CON and armor. Unless there are some limitations, I can easily play as a warrior, pump everything into STR and solo the game with ease.

the combat rolls isn't completely a bad thing, it comes helpful if you're against dragons, big stuff and hordes to just get out from the place really fast.

DEX could help in a way that when dodging, you have lesser chance of getting hit when doing the action. I could try to dodge an attack but with low dex, while dodging i can be stop or i can still get hit by a melee while dodging but I've gain a new position that are not flankable and I'll be able to counter. It can also give part to increase attack rates. i could swing that greatsword faster and do talents faster before the enemy could go out of reach.

CON could be helpful when you're running low with health potions and all you have is yourself and you could rely on your health to hold in there for a bit longer and higher constitution makes it possible to outlive opposition hordes and enemies that are level higher when your companion is all down. It could also help when you're far from your base and still have a long way to go and your health is not full and still surrounded by hordes.

there will still be enemies that have armor penetrating weapons but having armor won't let your other enemies deal more damage to you that much when you're concentrating on a big boss.

The DEX, CON, and armors may sounds too weak when by itself but if it is added in a gameplay, they can still be helpful.

[Trafalgar-Law]

This would require the COD crowd to actually give a damn about fantasy.

Require? Not really. I mean yeah, the COD crowd doesn't give a damn about fantasy, but try telling EA that!