sandalisthemaker wrote...
Wissenschaft wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
If they didn't want people using the term Kossith, and claim that it is inacurate, then why does world of Thedas basically say the exact opposite and calls the term Qunari inaccurate and and Kossith accurate.
World of Thedas vol 1, standard edition, pg.40:
"There is another race, relatively new to Thedas, that most people call Qunari....
However, the label 'Qunari' more accurately refers to a follower of the religious text known as the Qun, regardless of his or her race.. The horned race's ancient name is kossith. This term is outside scholarly circles."not widely used or even widely known."
So, the common human in Thedas is not familiar with the term, so that is why they are all called Qunari regardless. But claiming that Kossith is inaccurate and then writing that in world of Thedas is just inconsistent.
Anyway, I will accept the term Qunari to describe the race, but will not use it to describe the race myself.
Because the writters themselves clarified that Kossith refered to the Horned race in the same way Qunari does now.
Yeah. I get that, but I personally will not use the term Qunari to describe the race.
I will use the term Qunari when describing a follower of the religion regardless of their actual race.
I will use the term Tal-Vashoth to describe a former member of the religion that went against the Qun and no longer follows it regardless of their actual race.
But when I want to specifically describe a tall, gray-skinned, white-haired, muscular being with horns growing out of their head, I will use the term Kossith.
Kossith, Kossith, Kossith.
Effectively adding to the confusion. But if that's what you want to do, that's what you want to do.





Retour en haut







