Me? I would be disapointed, but maybe I would enjoy nevertheless, that is, if everything they are saying now is delivered in the final product.
Modifié par JCAP, 07 septembre 2013 - 01:38 .
Modifié par JCAP, 07 septembre 2013 - 01:38 .
Celtic Latino wrote...
While that would disappoint, it wouldn't break my chances of buying Inquisition.
Some of the most compelling BioWare companions have been non-romanceable. Varric, Aveline, Shale, Wynne, Wrex, Kasumi...pretty much whoever your character didn't romance.
Modifié par AresKeith, 07 septembre 2013 - 01:58 .
Guest_Morocco Mole_*
Morocco Mole wrote...
My respect for Bioware would increase.
Celtic Latino wrote...
While that would disappoint, it wouldn't break my chances of buying Inquisition.
Some of the most compelling BioWare companions have been non-romanceable. Varric, Aveline, Shale, Wynne, Wrex, Kasumi...pretty much whoever your character didn't romance. Heck I've never romanced Garrus and he's one of the most integral characters in a BioWare game.
People forget romance is optional. It's a GOOD thing to implement (being someone who hates my characters being forever alone), but it's not mandatory. There's been plenty of good games without it (Oblivion, Arcanum for the majority of character types, and Fallout 3/NV say hello).
Morocco Mole wrote...
My respect for Bioware would increase.
JCAP wrote...
I imagine that the fanbase would call a Exalted March upon Edmonton and take over the game development. And they would execute every dev on sight...
Me? I would be disapointed, but maybe I would enjoy nevertheless, that is, if everything they are saying now is delivered in the final product.
Cap. Obvious wrote...
Celtic Latino wrote...
While that would disappoint, it wouldn't break my chances of buying Inquisition.
Some of the most compelling BioWare companions have been non-romanceable. Varric, Aveline, Shale, Wynne, Wrex, Kasumi...pretty much whoever your character didn't romance.
Don't forget Sten!