Aller au contenu

Photo

some good demons


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
199 réponses à ce sujet

#51
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

Taleroth wrote...

BlueMagitek wrote...

The demon is still a demon, not a spirit, but you don't know any ulterior motives that it may have.

If you don't know its ulterior motives, then you don't know if it's a demon or a spirit.

The only difference is that one's a jerk and one's not. Justice was a spirit. Except when he was a jerk, then he was a demon.


Oh no, it's totes a demon.  We'll say it is a rage demon that incinerates some passing by bandits/darkspawn. 

#52
clone wars

clone wars
  • Members
  • 919 messages
we know that some demons have try to make deal to not get kill

#53
Fardreamer

Fardreamer
  • Members
  • 974 messages
People who say there are no good demons needs to go read Asunder. And before you say "He was a spirit, bla bla bla." The Litany of Andralla removes demonic influences on the mind, not spiritual.

#54
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages
What is the guy, who teaches you the Arcane Warrior spec in Origins?

#55
Dayze

Dayze
  • Members
  • 295 messages
You learn the arcane warrior spec from the trapped soul of an elf.

Closest I can come to thinking of a "good" demon was that desire demon that entranced a templar into thinking it had a family while it was feeding off of it, in its mind it was a reasonable deal because the demon was giving it a desire it could never satisfy in reality while it got energy from it.

I suppose there could be "good" demons but it would be pretty iffy, a demon thats stuck between being a spirit of justice and a rage demon.....actually I guess if the Desire Demon had a better understanding of reality it "could" have been a good demon too.

#56
Gwinever

Gwinever
  • Members
  • 575 messages

Fardreamer wrote...

People who say there are no good demons needs to go read Asunder. And before you say "He was a spirit, bla bla bla." The Litany of Andralla removes demonic influences on the mind, not spiritual.


Well, it could be attributed to him not knowing that he was infact a demon.
We will see wether he is a good demon or a bad demon in Inquisition:P

#57
Angrywolves

Angrywolves
  • Members
  • 4 644 messages
demons are evil by nature.
Call them good spirits.

#58
Former_Fiend

Former_Fiend
  • Members
  • 6 942 messages
Well, as we've seen that spirits can be corrupted into demons; Justice into Vengeance, I don't see why we couldn't see the reverse.

#59
Potato Cat

Potato Cat
  • Members
  • 7 784 messages
"Anders... There's no such thing as a good spirit. There never was. All spirits are dangerous. I understood that. I'm sorry that you didn't."
- Merrill

#60
Boycott Bioware

Boycott Bioware
  • Banned
  • 3 511 messages
Spirits are demons in DA, spirits are The Maker first children, so The Maker is a demon

#61
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 693 messages

Qistina wrote...

Spirits are demons in DA, spirits are The Maker first children, so The Maker is a demon

There are actual differences.  Spirits embody positive emotions while demons embody negative ones.  Demons also try and possess and many other nasty things that spirits don't really have a care for.  They are very similar in that they're both denizens of the fade who when killed in the mortal world probably just appear back in the fade again, but they have different purposes and needs.  Anders is right in that there's a difference between them, but he was wrong in how he thought there was no danger with a spirit.  Merrill is right in how there's no safe spirit of the fade, but she's wrong in that there is a difference between spirits and demons.

#62
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Qistina wrote...

Spirits are demons in DA, spirits are The Maker first children, so The Maker is a demon


You think the Maker is Fen'Harel? The Andrastian distinction of Spirits and Demons, with Spirits as the First Children of the Maker and Demons as Spirits who turned their backs on the Maker, is why the Dalish don't share the Andrastian distinction between Spirits and Demons, instead seeing them all as spirits who are dangerous. I know some other posters speculate that the Maker is Fen'Harel.

I wonder if the Qunari have any distinctions about the denizens of the Fade, since they see it as the land of the dead. I'd also like to know if the dwarves have any musings on the Fade and spirits.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 19 octobre 2013 - 05:09 .


#63
Guest_Snoop Lion_*

Guest_Snoop Lion_*
  • Guests
Good demons are called spirits. You meet one in DA:O, and in Awakening, and in DA2.

#64
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

There are actual differences.  Spirits embody positive emotions while demons embody negative ones.  Demons also try and possess and many other nasty things that spirits don't really have a care for.  They are very similar in that they're both denizens of the fade who when killed in the mortal world probably just appear back in the fade again, but they have different purposes and needs.  Anders is right in that there's a difference between them, but he was wrong in how he thought there was no danger with a spirit.  Merrill is right in how there's no safe spirit of the fade, but she's wrong in that there is a difference between spirits and demons. 


Not exactly. The conversation between Anders and Merrill makes it clear that the distinction is religiously and culturally Andrastian, which is why Merrill doesn't share Anders' view:

Anders: Maybe you don't really understand the difference between spirits and demons. 

Merrill: Did I ask you? 

Anders: Spirits were the first children of the Maker, but He turned his back on them to dote on His mortal creations. 

Anders: The ones who resented this became demons, driven to take everything mortals had and gain back the Maker's favor.

Merrill: Your "Maker" is a story you humans use to explain the world. We have our own stories. I don't need to borrow yours.

The Dalish believe in the Creators, not the Maker, so they wouldn't see spirits and demons as the Children of the Maker. In fact, Merrill acknowledges that the denizens of the Fade are different, but doesn't think that means the Chantry is correct in their religious views:

Anders: Do Dalish honestly not recognize the difference between demons and beneficial spirits? 

Merrill: We've never thought of the Fade as the home of our gods. It is another realm, another people's home. No different or more foreign than, say, Orzammar. 

Varric: You can say that again.

Anders: But have you never studied the types of demons? They break down very clearly into different sins--

Merrill: Spirits differ from each other, just as you and Hawke and Isabela are all human. More or less... 

The fact that Merrill acknowledges that the denizens of the Fade are different, but that the Dalish don't see them as Spirits and Demons (in Andrastian terms), is a point that many players miss due to the conversations between Anders and Merrill being easy to miss.

Merrill and the Dalish know there are distinctions (as she explains when she encounters the Sloth Demon), but they don't view them as the Children of the Maker, or embodiments of sins.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 19 octobre 2013 - 05:46 .


#65
Kelirax

Kelirax
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Is Nobody going to mention Cole?

#66
Former_Fiend

Former_Fiend
  • Members
  • 6 942 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

HiroVoid wrote...

There are actual differences.  Spirits embody positive emotions while demons embody negative ones.  Demons also try and possess and many other nasty things that spirits don't really have a care for.  They are very similar in that they're both denizens of the fade who when killed in the mortal world probably just appear back in the fade again, but they have different purposes and needs.  Anders is right in that there's a difference between them, but he was wrong in how he thought there was no danger with a spirit.  Merrill is right in how there's no safe spirit of the fade, but she's wrong in that there is a difference between spirits and demons. 


Not exactly. The conversation between Anders and Merrill makes it clear that the distinction is religiously and culturally Andrastian, which is why Merrill doesn't share Anders view:

Anders: Maybe you don't really understand the difference between spirits and demons. 

Merrill: Did I ask you? 

Anders: Spirits were the first children of the Maker, but He turned his back on them to dote on His mortal creations. 

Anders: The ones who resented this became demons, driven to take everything mortals had and gain back the Maker's favor.

Merrill: Your "Maker" is a story you humans use to explain the world. We have our own stories. I don't need to borrow yours.

The Dalish believe in the Creators, not the Maker, so they wouldn't see spirits and demons as the Children of the Maker. In fact, Merrill acknowledges that the denizens of the Fade are different, but doesn't think that means the Chantry is correct in their religious views:

Anders: Do Dalish honestly not recognize the difference between demons and beneficial spirits? 

Merrill: We've never thought of the Fade as the home of our gods. It is another realm, another people's home. No different or more foreign than, say, Orzammar. 

Varric: You can say that again.

Anders: But have you never studied the types of demons? They break down very clearly into different sins--

Merrill: Spirits differ from each other, just as you and Hawke and Isabela are all human. More or less... 

The fact that Merrill acknowledges that the denizens of the Fade are different, but that the Dalish don't see them as Spirits and Demons (in Andrastian terms), is a point that many players miss due to the conversations between Anders and Merrill being easy to miss.

Merrill and the Dalish know there are distinctions (as she explains when she encounters the Sloth Demon), but they don't view them as the Children of the Maker, or embodiments of sins.


While I actually tend to agree with the dalish view on this(one of the few things I agree with the dalish on), I wouldn't say it's completely andrastian. Morrigan, an ardent atheist, also holds the view of spirits and demons being clearly distinct from one another.

#67
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Former_Fiend wrote...

While I actually tend to agree with the dalish view on this(one of the few things I agree with the dalish on), I wouldn't say it's completely andrastian. Morrigan, an ardent atheist, also holds the view of spirits and demons being clearly distinct from one another. 


I think that's more of an issue of people using Andrastian terminology, in the way Marethari refers to demons and the Fade so Andrastians like Hawke understand her, since the protagonist can be confused at her mention of the Beyond, for example.  

#68
Former_Fiend

Former_Fiend
  • Members
  • 6 942 messages
I don't know. I'd expect when questions as to whether Flemeth called on spirits or demons(Morrigan said spirit), instead of saying "Spirits first. She didn't call on the demon until... much later", she'd explain that the distinction is meaningless.

Of course, it could be that the idea of the distinction being meaningless wasn't in the script when that line was written, or some such.

#69
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 693 messages
There's also the fact that I've seen Gaider come into the forums at multiple points saying there's a difference, though I don't remember the exact quotes.  Then, I think I remember a quote about how each demon has a corrupted spirit version such as how Faith's corrupted form is apparently pride.

Modifié par HiroVoid, 19 octobre 2013 - 06:04 .


#70
Azrielon

Azrielon
  • Members
  • 189 messages
I could see a demon potentially helping us, depending on what the Fade tear actually does, I mean if it is a threat to either plane of existence, I doubt all demons would want it to continue, or out of simple self preservation with a number of big wigs on there way. Or just a simple desire to return to the status quo.

Of course in such a situation, I don't think the demon should be trusted in game at all.

#71
wcholcombe

wcholcombe
  • Members
  • 2 738 messages
Of course there is a difference. The demons literally feed on an emotion, we have seen no evidence of spirits feeding on anything.

Also, as seen in DA2 and Asunder spirits have a completely different appearance in the fade than demons and have a very very antagonistic attitude towards each other. Just because the Dalish haven't studied the fade to the degree that the Tevinter Magisters have, doesn't make them right.

BTW, the idea of spirits and Demons comes from Tevinter, not from the Chantry. The chantry brought up the bit about thier relation to the Maker, but Tevinter had been studying and labeling them as spirits and demons long before the rise of Andraste.

#72
wcholcombe

wcholcombe
  • Members
  • 2 738 messages

Azrielon wrote...

I could see a demon potentially helping us, depending on what the Fade tear actually does, I mean if it is a threat to either plane of existence, I doubt all demons would want it to continue, or out of simple self preservation with a number of big wigs on there way. Or just a simple desire to return to the status quo.

Of course in such a situation, I don't think the demon should be trusted in game at all.


Demons have aided us.  If you let the demon you encounter in the deel roads go free he gives you a gift.  This doesn't make him good, it just means he aided us. 

#73
Azrielon

Azrielon
  • Members
  • 189 messages

wcholcombe wrote...

Azrielon wrote...

I could see a demon potentially helping us, depending on what the Fade tear actually does, I mean if it is a threat to either plane of existence, I doubt all demons would want it to continue, or out of simple self preservation with a number of big wigs on there way. Or just a simple desire to return to the status quo.

Of course in such a situation, I don't think the demon should be trusted in game at all.


Demons have aided us.  If you let the demon you encounter in the deel roads go free he gives you a gift.  This doesn't make him good, it just means he aided us. 


I never said anything about a good demon, so I'm not sure if you are arguing against me or not here.

#74
BaronFonAphedron

BaronFonAphedron
  • Members
  • 16 messages
If a spirit can fall and turn into a demon, then a demon can rise and become a spirit once again, IMO. Circle's Desire demon is one of my favourite characters in DAO. I wish we could invite/summon her for a cup of tea with cookies and have a good clarifying conversation about demonic and humanic(for her) nature. Alas!

#75
Chaos Hammer

Chaos Hammer
  • Members
  • 217 messages

Fardreamer wrote...

People who say there are no good demons needs to go read Asunder. And before you say "He was a spirit, bla bla bla." The Litany of Andralla removes demonic influences on the mind, not spiritual.


That's great, except there's no real difference between the two except for motivations and physically, but they are the same origins, Its like saying an anti white person poison wouldn't work on a black person, t'would
.