Aller au contenu

Photo

Multiplayer, do you want it or not? Maybe even PvP


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
170 réponses à ce sujet

#26
FeliciaM

FeliciaM
  • Members
  • 298 messages
If they force it down my throat like ME3, then I'll play the bare minimum to get what I need for the single player campaign. I didn't even play the multiplayer content in me3. My husband did, so... I benefited off that :P

#27
Uccio

Uccio
  • Members
  • 4 696 messages
No mp. Do.not.want.

Modifié par Ukki, 08 septembre 2013 - 07:10 .


#28
Secretlyapotato

Secretlyapotato
  • Members
  • 815 messages
I would be terrible at Dragon Age PvP, lolz

#29
Am1vf

Am1vf
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages
No, I don't want multiplayer. Thanks for asking.

#30
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages
Yes i want multiplayer, the chance to play with new character choices, armor designs, abilities, and enjoy a more developed multiplayer experience than mass effect 3's one mode option. Me3's dlc policy for MP along with the characters released, combined with multiple gaming modes, would be great.

It won't happen, I know. But I still want it.

#31
Adela

Adela
  • Members
  • 6 633 messages

Archaven wrote...

Sorry i do not want it. We have enough of these MMOs already please. And it's all Free!. Go play them and be prepared for very minimal and small micro.. transactions.. /sarcasm.

This kind of feature will only cost more money for development, resources and sacrifice other details for a single player experience. Like it or not this is a fact. Please go the Witcher 3 way where they understand this completely.

If they so choose to.. then make an F2P Dragon Age.. see how much they gonna make like SWTOR MMO.


^this

#32
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

ag99 wrote...

Archaven wrote...

Sorry i do not want it. We have enough of these MMOs already please. And it's all Free!. Go play them and be prepared for very minimal and small micro.. transactions.. /sarcasm.

This kind of feature will only cost more money for development, resources and sacrifice other details for a single player experience. Like it or not this is a fact. Please go the Witcher 3 way where they understand this completely.

If they so choose to.. then make an F2P Dragon Age.. see how much they gonna make like SWTOR MMO.


^this


So the only multiplayer games in exsistence are MMO's? Someone should tell COD and Battlefield they've been playing an MMO this whole time.

#33
suprhomre

suprhomre
  • Members
  • 1 671 messages
yes, make it like ME3 please, I so miss my gaming buddies.

#34
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
No.

#35
BouncyFrag

BouncyFrag
  • Members
  • 5 048 messages
It would be a good place for the various DA factions to go out and settle things out on the field rather than adding to the seemingly never ending stream of mage vs templars, etc. topics. I also think it would be rewarding to play with people on the forum who are passionate about Dragon Age. The ME3 MP board has a great community of players to get tips from as well as find people to add to your friends list.

#36
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
 No. Multiplayer would imply gameplay quirks which influence the singleplayer.

#37
a7rivera

a7rivera
  • Members
  • 164 messages
I think either a horde mode or co-op could work. I wonder if they'll have a system similar to go galactic readiness from Mass Effect

#38
puppy maclove

puppy maclove
  • Members
  • 390 messages
NO THANKS. (if it is there for some ungodly reason, then it should HAVE ZERO influence on SP otherwise no buy)

#39
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 779 messages
it does not matter if we want it or not, or if Bioware wants it or not.....EA brags about not green lighting games without MP components so yes it will be in

#40
Rolling Flame

Rolling Flame
  • Members
  • 927 messages
If there is multiplayer, it better not be as ****ing laggy as ME3 could be.

At the very least, there should be a search by region option.

Modifié par Rolling Flame, 08 septembre 2013 - 10:55 .


#41
Battlebloodmage

Battlebloodmage
  • Members
  • 8 698 messages
I don't mind, as long as it is completely separated from the story mode.

#42
laudable11

laudable11
  • Members
  • 1 171 messages
Horde mode co-op please.

How about group castle storming?

#43
phunx

phunx
  • Members
  • 371 messages

Maria Caliban wrote...

I prefer horde mode, but PvP could also be fun. I prefer team PvP though.


If there's team pvp, can I be on your team Maria??? :lol:


EDIT: Why are the options so extreme? I am not sure about it. I want a good multiplayer and don't want a bad one. Don't have such extreme beliefs based on nothing.

Modifié par phunx, 08 septembre 2013 - 11:02 .


#44
Reofeir

Reofeir
  • Members
  • 2 534 messages

laudable11 wrote...

Horde mode co-op please.

How about group castle storming?

I might like something like this.

#45
SirGladiator

SirGladiator
  • Members
  • 1 143 messages
I really enjoyed the ME3 MP way more than I expected to. Even when I was tired of playing the main game, I still wasn't tired of the MP, it was in certain ways superior to the main game itself. Just super fun. That's the format I'd like for DAI MP, a small team of players facing ever-tougher waves of opponents, and getting nifty rewards for winning. No PVP, nothing like that, just as close to the ME3 MP format as reasonably possible, that was awesome, and I know they can make DAI MP just as awesome, probably even moreso.

#46
DaringMoosejaw

DaringMoosejaw
  • Members
  • 1 340 messages
ME3 being a shooter means DA:I would be a whole other matter entirely.

ME3 MP was fun for a bit, but it was ultimately limited. I had waaaay more fun in BF3 because MP was the focus, and I'd rather not every game try to be all things to everyone, so no MP at all in my opinion.

While co-op is a good idea, it specifically wouldn't work so great in DA because of all the pausing you'd have to do and all the story cutscenes peppered across.

#47
Navasha

Navasha
  • Members
  • 3 724 messages
Multiplayer in ME3 worked for a couple reasons.
1) They didn't try to incorporate it into the main SP game (not talking War Assets, just the actual play). Any kind of attempt to add a co-op to the main game would have killed the game.

2) They made it strictly players vs AI. If they had made it a PvP mode, it wouldn't have been successful. You would have had the same 100 guys running around trying to rack up their headshot count and most of the people would have abandoned it after the first hour since there would never be an opportunity to learn to get better. Griefers who should be on Gold difficulty would be running around on the easiest levels slaughtering all the people who never played it before.

#48
inarvan

inarvan
  • Members
  • 70 messages
Multiplayer would be fine for me if it's done well. I'd love to see coop and horde mode, or something similar to ME3. It would also be kind of cool to get the option of playing out your agent deployments as MP coop missions.

#49
Jeremiah12LGeek

Jeremiah12LGeek
  • Members
  • 23 885 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...

ag99 wrote...

Archaven wrote...

Sorry i do not want it. We have enough of these MMOs already please. {snip}


^this


So the only multiplayer games in exsistence are MMO's? Someone should tell COD and Battlefield they've been playing an MMO this whole time.


Heck, I'd love to know how I never noticed that ME 3 was an MMO.

I thought it shared most of its resources with the SP campaign, but I was so very foolish, apparently. :crying:

#50
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 114 messages
I'd really prefer no mp.
2nd choice would be Mp completely separate from the SP experience.