Will the Qunari Inquisitor be locked out of romances?
#1
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:19
Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.
#2
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:20
#3
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:22
#4
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:23
#5
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:24
#6
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:25
filetemo wrote...
Maybe it's a solution, albeit a radical one, to the issue of carnal love being contrary to the beliefs of the Qun or the lack of sexual interest by Kossith. And it also would be a solution to avoid potential awkwardness in romances.
Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.
The qunari Inquisitor does not follow the Qun.
#7
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:25
#8
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:28
franciscoamell wrote...
Romance is already optional, I don't see the need to restrict it further. If you find romance as a qunari awkward then don't do it.
Not me, but I'd say writers were contrary to the idea of a human inquisitor / qunari companion romance. Those who wanted it were called fetishists by some
Former_Fiend wrote...
Romance doesn't necessarily need to be sexual.
Interesting. Would you wish to elaborate on that?
#9
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:28
#10
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:28
EDIT
Half ninja'd there!
Modifié par Elfman, 08 septembre 2013 - 09:28 .
#11
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:28
#12
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:29
I think that's pretty much the same case to dwarf romance and yet we were not restricted in Origins. I wish we could've romanced Sigrun though and I hope Varric will be an LI.filetemo wrote...
franciscoamell wrote...
Romance is already optional, I don't see the need to restrict it further. If you find romance as a qunari awkward then don't do it.
Not me, but I'd say writers were contrary to the idea of a human inquisitor / qunari companion romance. Those who wanted it were called fetishists by some
#13
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:30
filetemo wrote...
... the lack of sexual interest by Kossith.
Where did you get that from? (Not disputing, just don't recall hearing that anywhere.)
#14
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:34
Firky wrote...
filetemo wrote...
... the lack of sexual interest by Kossith.
Where did you get that from? (Not disputing, just don't recall hearing that anywhere.)
Qunari have no "family units": they do not marry, choose partners, or even know to whom they are related. A Qunari's "family" consists of his or her coworkers.[13]Qunari generally do not associate mating with love. They feel love. They have friends. They form emotional bonds with one another. However, they simply do not sleep with each other to express it. If they do, then they are sent to be reeducated by the Ben-Hassrath. If a child is produced, the same thing happens as with all other Qunari children: it is sent to be raised by the Tamassrans, evaluated, and assigned a job. Qunari do not waste resources unnecessarily, people included.[13]http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Qunari
#15
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:34
There'll be no restrictions, maybe it might be briefly brought up if the Qunari PC was ever actually religiously Qunari but just as a reference.
#16
Guest_krul2k_*
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:34
Guest_krul2k_*
#17
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:35
Jhonny Nocturne wrote...
filetemo wrote...
Maybe it's a solution, albeit a radical one, to the issue of carnal love being contrary to the beliefs of the Qun or the lack of sexual interest by Kossith. And it also would be a solution to avoid potential awkwardness in romances.
Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.
The qunari Inquisitor does not follow the Qun.
That's the most probable scenario, but please, don't say with that certainty because the devs might surprise us yet again.
#18
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:38
JCAP wrote...
That's the most probable scenario, but please, don't say with that certainty because the devs might surprise us yet again.
It is extremely unlikely as they wouldn't make sense otherwise. But even if it does happen and he's wrong - what's the worst that happens? Someone come back here a year later and goes, 'YOU WERE WRONG, HOW DARE YOU' and they call the cops?
#19
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:43
Modifié par Genshie, 08 septembre 2013 - 09:44 .
#20
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:43
filetemo wrote...
Firky wrote...
filetemo wrote...
... the lack of sexual interest by Kossith.
Where did you get that from? (Not disputing, just don't recall hearing that anywhere.)
Qunari have no "family units": they do not marry, choose partners, or even know to whom they are related. A Qunari's "family" consists of his or her coworkers.[13]Qunari generally do not associate mating with love. They feel love. They have friends. They form emotional bonds with one another. However, they simply do not sleep with each other to express it. If they do, then they are sent to be reeducated by the Ben-Hassrath. If a child is produced, the same thing happens as with all other Qunari children: it is sent to be raised by the Tamassrans, evaluated, and assigned a job. Qunari do not waste resources unnecessarily, people included.[13]http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Qunari
That concerns only cultural Qunaris, but the Inqunsitor will not follow the Qun
#21
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:46
#22
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:46
Edit: And here comes the "but it adds to the realism of roleplaying", bit....<_<
Modifié par Genshie, 08 septembre 2013 - 09:48 .
#23
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:47
filetemo wrote...
franciscoamell wrote...
Romance is already optional, I don't see the need to restrict it further. If you find romance as a qunari awkward then don't do it.
Not me, but I'd say writers were contrary to the idea of a human inquisitor / qunari companion romance. Those who wanted it were called fetishists by someFormer_Fiend wrote...
Romance doesn't necessarily need to be sexual.
Interesting. Would you wish to elaborate on that?
I thought it was fairly self explanitory. You don't have to have sex with someone to express your feelings for them. It's that simple.
Having said that I don't imagine they're actually going to do that. As others have pointed out, the player's qunari won't be a follower of the Qun and therefore is not bound by this particular restriction.
#24
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:48
I can't see how we are supposed to make our own character in this RPG if s/he's forced into the qun because of background.
#25
Posté 08 septembre 2013 - 09:48
DaringMoosejaw wrote...
JCAP wrote...
That's the most probable scenario, but please, don't say with that certainty because the devs might surprise us yet again.
It is extremely unlikely as they wouldn't make sense otherwise. But even if it does happen and he's wrong - what's the worst that happens? Someone come back here a year later and goes, 'YOU WERE WRONG, HOW DARE YOU' and they call the cops?
I just think we must be the most accurate possible with our statements. Otherwise, talking with other people can be the worst way of learning something new.
The point is: we shouldn't affirm with all certainty something we don't know for sure. No one is going to call the cops, but I shouldn't throw garbage to the ground now should I?
Modifié par JCAP, 08 septembre 2013 - 09:49 .





Retour en haut







