Aller au contenu

Photo

Will the Qunari Inquisitor be locked out of romances?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
130 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Vapaa

Vapaa
  • Members
  • 5 028 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Or, here's a radical notion:

People get to decide for themselves how their Qunari character feels, thinks and behaves.

Huh? Huh?


Madness ! how dare you talk about free will ? gross ! disgusting !

#102
Patchwork

Patchwork
  • Members
  • 2 585 messages
As our qunquistor has a surname it's possible they're second generation tal-vasoth and haven't had first hand experience with the qun. They're comfortable with the idea of sex because they feel like it not because some priest thinks you and that Arvvard with extra curvy horns will make awesome ox babies.

See that I can headcanon and backstory my pcs into any decision I like, so rather than blocking content because you don't like it simply don't choose that option.

#103
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 223 messages

Ser Bard wrote...

As our qunquistor has a surname it's possible they're second generation tal-vasoth and haven't had first hand experience with the qun.

That's been my guess.

#104
VampireSoap

VampireSoap
  • Members
  • 1 200 messages
Excuse me? The Kossith race has little or no sex drive? Have you seen the body of a female Kossith? I...I just refuse to believe that manner of magnificence would not guarantee erotic desires. (Which is normal, mind you! :lol:)

#105
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

Plaintiff wrote...

Or, here's a radical notion:

People get to decide for themselves how their Qunari character feels, thinks and behaves.

Huh? Huh?


I believe Bioware does that my friend.

#106
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 287 messages

Rolling Flame wrote...

Imagine the rage if they were locked out.

It would truly be glorious

#107
Billy-the-Squid

Billy-the-Squid
  • Members
  • 393 messages
dp

Modifié par Tequila Cat, 09 septembre 2013 - 02:03 .


#108
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Or, here's a radical notion:

People get to decide for themselves how their Qunari character feels, thinks and behaves.

Huh? Huh?


I believe Bioware does that my friend.

Congratulations on getting the point.

#109
Gill Kaiser

Gill Kaiser
  • Members
  • 6 061 messages
The Qunari approach to sex is cultural, not biological, as far as I know. If the Qunari PC is a second generation Vashoth, they won't have that problem.

#110
The Six Path of Pain

The Six Path of Pain
  • Members
  • 778 messages
I highly doubt the Qunari we are playing even follows the Qun. We'll most likely be playing a Vashot. So no, I don't think they'll be locked out of romances.
P.S. Bioware please release the true name of the Qunari race. It is kind of difficult calling a Qunari who doesn't follow the Qun a Qunari.

Modifié par The Six Path of Pain, 09 septembre 2013 - 05:41 .


#111
PinkDiamondstl

PinkDiamondstl
  • Members
  • 1 099 messages
Not gonna go there . Humans & Elves only

#112
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 410 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Rolling Flame wrote...

Imagine the rage if they were locked out.

It would truly be glorious


Eh only a small percentage is gonna playing them in the first place so I don't see that much rage.

If humans were locked out on the other hand.  :?

#113
filetemo

filetemo
  • Members
  • 2 646 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Rolling Flame wrote...

Imagine the rage if they were locked out.

It would truly be glorious


Eh only a small percentage is gonna playing them in the first place so I don't see that much rage.

If humans were locked out on the other hand.  :?


Past experiences suggest something akin to:

95% of BSN members will try Qunari
5% of regular players will

Therefore, the general impression on the BSN will be that "everybody plays qunari";)

#114
PinkDiamondstl

PinkDiamondstl
  • Members
  • 1 099 messages

filetemo wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Rolling Flame wrote...

Imagine the rage if they were locked out.

It would truly be glorious


Eh only a small percentage is gonna playing them in the first place so I don't see that much rage.

If humans were locked out on the other hand.  :?


Past experiences suggest something akin to:

95% of BSN members will try Qunari
5% of regular players will


Therefore, the general impression on the BSN will be that "everybody plays qunari";)




I believe that you are way off on those numbers kid. :huh:

#115
Sporothrix

Sporothrix
  • Members
  • 936 messages

Chashan wrote...

 Skimming through the couple pages here thus far, I haven't found it yet, so here goes a quote by one of the developers, Mary Kirby, on Qunari social interactions:

Qunari don't generally associate mating with love. They feel love. They have friends. They form emotional bonds with one another. They just don't sleep with each other to express it. And if they do, they get re-educated by the Ben-Hassrath. So, y'know, not exactly encouragement there.

If such a thing occurred and produced a child, the same thing would happen to the offspring as happens to all other Qunari offspring: It would be raised by the Tamassrans, evaluated, and assigned a job. Qunari don't waste people unnecessarily.


So, in other words yes, Qunari can feel affection for one another, and no, that affection does not extend to copulation.

Frankly, I'd love to see romance-content done without that when it comes down to it. But then again, I wouldn't even mind if bed-play cutscenes were omitted in general, but that's just me.


But you understood it as a point that they are asexual? For me it's clear it's about Qun forbidding them having sex outside of mating assignments with someone chosen by Tamassrans. And everything suggests we're  not going to play Qun believer.

On another note, I wonder how homosexuality is viewed by Qun. It doesn't collide with selective breeding program it enforces, but on another hand judging from real life cultures that are repressive when it comes to sex and gender roles, it's hard for me to imagine it to be very tolerant.

If our Qunari is going to be Tal-Vashoth (since devs can also decide that they were never born to that faith on the first place), I think it could be good reason for my character to leave Qun.
Hope it won't be wasted RPG opportunity like in City Elf origin in DAO, where you couldn't adress that maybe you just don't want to get married with a guy because you're lesbian (or however they call it in game world, since I'm sure there are words for it, again, which we never heard of), in a culture that supposedly (according to devs) has no problems with that.

Modifié par misoretu9, 09 septembre 2013 - 08:18 .


#116
Marvin_Arnold

Marvin_Arnold
  • Members
  • 1 121 messages
First, an Inquisitor cannot follow the Qun, since (s)he's a Chantry employee.

As long as the Inquisitor and his/her LI take the precautions recommended by Sten in DA:O, I don't see a problem.

#117
Captain Obvious

Captain Obvious
  • Members
  • 1 113 messages

filetemo wrote...

Maybe it's a solution, albeit a radical one, to the issue of carnal love being contrary to the beliefs of the Qun or the lack of sexual interest by Kossith. And it also would be a solution to avoid potential awkwardness in romances.

Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.

Who says all Kossith lack sexual interest? Maybe the ones that don't follow the Qun do have sexual interest? Perhaps the Qunari simply only believe in sex for reproduction?

#118
Vapaa

Vapaa
  • Members
  • 5 028 messages

Marvin_Arnold wrote...

First, an Inquisitor cannot follow the Qun, since (s)he's a Chantry employee.


No (s)he isn't

#119
Sporothrix

Sporothrix
  • Members
  • 936 messages

Cap. Obvious wrote...

filetemo wrote...

Maybe it's a solution, albeit a radical one, to the issue of carnal love being contrary to the beliefs of the Qun or the lack of sexual interest by Kossith. And it also would be a solution to avoid potential awkwardness in romances.

Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.

Who says all Kossith lack sexual interest? Maybe the ones that don't follow the Qun do have sexual interest? Perhaps the Qunari simply only believe in sex for reproduction?

If they lacked sexual interest there would be no need for any 'reeducation', plus it wouldn't really make sense that whole or even majority of members of species was asexual.
Qunari have selective breeding eugenic program, that what it's all about. Tamassrans decide who has sex with who with hope that they'll breed "the best of the best". Of course it wouldn't work if they allowed (straight) mating outside of the system.

Modifié par misoretu9, 09 septembre 2013 - 08:43 .


#120
Vapaa

Vapaa
  • Members
  • 5 028 messages

misoretu9 wrote...

If they lacked sexual interest there would be no need for any 'reeducation', plus it wouldn't really make sense that whole or even majority of members of species was asexual.
Qunari have selective breeding eugenic program, that what it's all about. Tamassrans decide who has sex with who with hope that they'll breed "the best of the best". Of course it wouldn't work if they allowed (straight) mating outside of the system.


Yes, besides, any species that reproduces through sex can't be asexual, that would be like saying carnivores only eat weeds

#121
Chashan

Chashan
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages

misoretu9 wrote...


But you understood it as a point that they are asexual? For me it's clear it's about Qun forbidding them having sex outside of mating assignments with someone chosen by Tamassrans.


I understood that to mean that oxmen - I'll be sticking to that term to avoid confusion -, among whose ranks the Qun was envisioned, may indeed strictly separate between love and copulation, with next to no overlap between the two as far as they see it independent even of what the Qun demands. They are a fictional kind of non-humans, thus do not have to follow the same basic urges.

And everything suggests we're  not going to play Qun believer.


Not certain yet, and I would hope the developers at least consider the option again. As someone else put it: oxmen without Qunari background feels an awful lot like dwarves in DA:O without a noble one.

On another note, I wonder how homosexuality is viewed by Qun. It doesn't collide with selective breeding program it enforces, but on another hand judging from real life cultures that are repressive when it comes to sex and gender roles, it's hard for me to imagine it to be very tolerant.


Going by the quote, I would imagine such behaviour would be frowned upon and treated the same way as heterosexual affairs. So 'equal treatment', if you will.

If our Qunari is going to be Tal-Vashoth (since devs can also decide that they were never born to that faith on the first place), I think it could be good reason for my character to leave Qun.
Hope it won't be wasted RPG opportunity like in City Elf origin in DAO, where you couldn't adress that maybe you just don't want to get married with a guy because you're lesbian (or however they call it in game world, since I'm sure there are words for it, again, which we never heard of), in a culture that supposedly (according to devs) has no problems with that.


A fairly short episode, and it is made clear by the City Elf's father that it's a marriage of convenience more than anything else. One can also express unwillingness to go along with it, so no major problem there.
'sides, poor bridegroom fella doesn't survive long either.

#122
PurpleNurplex0x

PurpleNurplex0x
  • Members
  • 4 messages
I don't think the playable qunari will nessecarily follow the qun or be associated with the tal vashoth.
Kind of like Maraas in DA2. He was the qunari in act 3 who was a sword for hire in the Hanged Man and had previously warned you about TalVashoth in the wounded coast, saying he left the qun as well as them.

Hasn't it also been hinted that we may get a qunari companion? Perhaps that would be a potential LI for qunari players. Maybe it is even Maraas ;)

#123
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 410 messages

filetemo wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Rolling Flame wrote...

Imagine the rage if they were locked out.

It would truly be glorious


Eh only a small percentage is gonna playing them in the first place so I don't see that much rage.

If humans were locked out on the other hand.  :?


Past experiences suggest something akin to:

95% of BSN members will try Qunari
5% of regular players will

Therefore, the general impression on the BSN will be that "everybody plays qunari";)





Nah it might be 10% just many of those 10% will be extremely loud and obnoxious about it.

#124
Captain Obvious

Captain Obvious
  • Members
  • 1 113 messages

misoretu9 wrote...

Cap. Obvious wrote...

filetemo wrote...

Maybe it's a solution, albeit a radical one, to the issue of carnal love being contrary to the beliefs of the Qun or the lack of sexual interest by Kossith. And it also would be a solution to avoid potential awkwardness in romances.

Maybe after being born under the Qun, the Inquisitor retains disinterest on romantic relations, and while he / she is now free to do as desired, that opression still lasts inside.

Who says all Kossith lack sexual interest? Maybe the ones that don't follow the Qun do have sexual interest? Perhaps the Qunari simply only believe in sex for reproduction?

If they lacked sexual interest there would be no need for any 'reeducation', plus it wouldn't really make sense that whole or even majority of members of species was asexual.
Qunari have selective breeding eugenic program, that what it's all about. Tamassrans decide who has sex with who with hope that they'll breed "the best of the best". Of course it wouldn't work if they allowed (straight) mating outside of the system.

Exactly. There is nothing suggesting that the Qunari are all asexual. 

#125
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

filetemo wrote...
I wouldn't call an 1 hour introduction customised origin "aesthetic". It had repercussions in the story, quests and endgame


If you think DA:O had "rich" consequences, I'm sure DAI will deliver. I happen to think an entirely self-contained area that then leads to almost identical content for the remainder of the game is not really reactive.