TK514 wrote...
So Torture is ok, then. I mean, as long as you only torture 'bad' people, it's totally fine, right?GabrielXL wrote...
Exactly part of what I'm trying to say. Also, the only suffering the Warden and Hawke inflicting on people were those who would do harm to him/her or others. This again drives home the point that evil is in the heart and mind of individuals, not in what they use. If people are made to suffer, it doesn't matter if it's a Priest, a Mage, a Warrior or a corrupt official that's causing it. No one with power is immune.LobselVith8 wrote...
The point was a person isn't malevolent simply because they used blood magic. Some Grey Warden mages use blood magic against the darkspawn; some apostates use blood magic because templars can nullify ordinary magic; it's not inherently evil. The Warden from the Circle and apostate Hawke can use blood magic for the same reasons. simply because some abuse this school of magic doesn't mean they it's evil.
There are exactly zero moral or ethical considerations regarding torture, as long as you only torture bad people. This is what you're saying.
What about torturing good people, for a good end? Is that good? If you have to torture a innocent child to save a building full of other innocents, does that make the torture good? Is that a good act?
I just want to be clear about your position here, so I have a proper understanding about what you consider good and evil.
I don't disagree with you that blood magic can be made all the more powerful by suffering and death, and thus it is a very dangerous tool to use, but I don't think it follows that this makes blood magic inherently evil, since blood, not suffering and death, is the requirement for its use, and I see nothing problematic about a person using their own blood to power a spell, or with people willingly volunteering their own blood, if the cause itself is just. Yes, there are spells that can only be powered with blood, and some of those spells are unquestionably dark (which doesn't necessarily say that they don't have their justifiable uses, though it does get tricky), but it shouldn't be forgotten that blood can also simply be used as a power source for benign magic.
It's just not the case that someone who finds acceptable--or justifiable, if you'd rather--applications for blood magic, particularly if they are using it as a power source and not for spells only accessible through blood--would necessarily be cool with torture.
I also question whether there is WoG saying that blood magic is only ever powered by suffering and death, as you are claiming. Just because this comment is in the World of Thedas doesn't make it Word of God, if it it's presented as the opinion of a DA character. I'll have to go and pull out my copy now.
Modifié par Silfren, 24 octobre 2013 - 04:25 .





Retour en haut






