Aller au contenu

Photo

IGN's top 100 FPS= Major lulz.


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
108 réponses à ce sujet

#1
NeonFlux117

NeonFlux117
  • Members
  • 3 627 messages
 
http://www.ign.com/top/shooters


Yeah, this is just stupidly funny. I don't really get into top this and top that, but for some reason IGNorant.com's lists always irk me. 

This is no exception. 

So already, they've entered the realm of "I can't take you seriously" with putting games Like Unreal Tounrament, Battlefield 3 and CSS in the top 80- these games are easily top 20. Easily. 

Sorry, this is a rant. 


But these games are bested by games like Metroid Prime and star trek voyage and Deus Ex HR, lol. DEHR is an amaing game, but it's an RPG/first person/cover shooter/stealth hybrid. It's FPS mechanics are actually a bit lacking. 


lol, it's list's like this that make me wonder. Does IGN even have people on staff that play games?

I know it's just a stupid list. But still. 


C'mon man!!!

#2
Tommyspa

Tommyspa
  • Members
  • 1 397 messages
You have a fundamental problem with others opinions?

#3
NeonFlux117

NeonFlux117
  • Members
  • 3 627 messages

Tommyspa wrote...

You have a fundamental problem with others opinions?


It's just a bit of rant Tommy, thought I'd share this on BSN. 

I'll just keep it to myself I guess. 

#4
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 374 messages
This is a rant that a random group of people on the internet have an opinion which does not match your own.

I'd probably consider not even mentioning CSS on a top FPS list, because it's just CS 1.6 with a fancy graphics engine(for its time).

#5
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 374 messages

NeonFlux117 wrote...

Tommyspa wrote...

You have a fundamental problem with others opinions?


It's just a bit of rant Tommy, thought I'd share this on BSN.

I'll just keep it to myself I guess.





Just to clarify for my post at least, it's fine if you want to talk about their top 100 FPS list and how it doesn't match your own opinions.

but to call them ignorant because of that means that it is you who are the ignorant one.

#6
NeonFlux117

NeonFlux117
  • Members
  • 3 627 messages
IGNorant.com is a common play on words that many gamers use to refer to ign.com. This term comes from how out of touch ign is with many gamers, paid review scores and overall corporate whoring ign gives out- ME3 is a great example of this, but there are many others.

And it is my mistake for posting this on BSN. I should and will in the future keep any thoughts of disagreement with big corporations- EA, IGN, BioWare, Sony and Microsoft to myself. As this could potentially create discourse and discussion on BioWare Social Network site.

And I'd never want to do that.

Mods please close thread.

Thanks.

Modifié par NeonFlux117, 09 septembre 2013 - 11:29 .


#7
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 374 messages
I am aware of where the term comes from, but you're still calling them ignorant for disagreeing with your opinion.

Discussion is fine, but there is a hue difference between "I disagree with you, and here is why" and "You're stupid because you don't agree with me".

Your OP is the second one of those, and it has fairly little discussion value to it.

but please, by all means tell me that I'm against discussion when I specifically said it's fine to disagree with their list and talk about it here.

#8
The Elite Elite

The Elite Elite
  • Members
  • 1 039 messages
Well, I haven't even played 100 different shooters, but I'd personally put Jedi Knight Dark Forces 2 somewhere closer to number one on the list. That was such an amazingly outstanding game for its time. God I'd love it if that game got an anniversary edition. Neither Halo Reach nor Doom 3 would be on my list.

#9
NeonFlux117

NeonFlux117
  • Members
  • 3 627 messages

Cyonan wrote...

I am aware of where the term comes from, but you're still calling them ignorant for disagreeing with your opinion.

Discussion is fine, but there is a hue difference between "I disagree with you, and here is why" and "You're stupid because you don't agree with me".

Your OP is the second one of those, and it has fairly little discussion value to it.

but please, by all means tell me that I'm against discussion when I specifically said it's fine to disagree with their list and talk about it here.



First off, I don't care what you know. Or think you know. Or if you think it's okay for me to discuss whether I agree or not agree with things. Secondly, I made the thread cause I thought their list was commical. My own list would be very different, but who really cares. Their list to me, is funny. If you agree with them then, cool story bro. 

But I challenge anyone to tell me how Star Trek Voyager is better than Battlefield 3 or Unreal tournament, lol. It's just a list, I found it funny. It's about gaming. A major factor and genre in gaming. It's off topic. I posted it in the off topic section of a gaming forum for those reasons. My mistake. 

This was the wrong place to post this. 
 
BSN is quickly becoming more entertaining and dumb than any list on ign. 


And that's saying something. 

#10
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 374 messages

NeonFlux117 wrote...
First off, I don't care what you know. Or think you know. Or if you think it's okay for me to discuss whether I agree or not agree with things. Secondly, I made the thread cause I thought their list was commical. My own list would be very different, but who really cares. Their list to me, is funny. If you agree with them then, cool story bro.

But I challenge anyone to tell me how Star Trek Voyager is better than Battlefield 3 or Unreal tournament, lol. It's just a list, I found it funny. It's about gaming. A major factor and genre in gaming. It's off topic. I posted it in the off topic section of a gaming forum for those reasons. My mistake.

This was the wrong place to post this.

BSN is quickly becoming more entertaining and dumb than any list on ign.


And that's saying something.


It's rather hilarious that you make a post insulting somebody for having an opinion that doesn't match yours, then start insulting people who call you out on that and point out that your post has no discussion value.

Entertaining and dumb indeed, my dear NeonFlux =P

#11
NeonFlux117

NeonFlux117
  • Members
  • 3 627 messages

Cyonan wrote...

NeonFlux117 wrote...
First off, I don't care what you know. Or think you know. Or if you think it's okay for me to discuss whether I agree or not agree with things. Secondly, I made the thread cause I thought their list was commical. My own list would be very different, but who really cares. Their list to me, is funny. If you agree with them then, cool story bro.

But I challenge anyone to tell me how Star Trek Voyager is better than Battlefield 3 or Unreal tournament, lol. It's just a list, I found it funny. It's about gaming. A major factor and genre in gaming. It's off topic. I posted it in the off topic section of a gaming forum for those reasons. My mistake.

This was the wrong place to post this.

BSN is quickly becoming more entertaining and dumb than any list on ign.


And that's saying something.





It's rather hilarious that you make a post insulting somebody for having an opinion that doesn't match yours, then start insulting people who call you out on that and point out that your post has no discussion value.

Entertaining and dumb indeed, my dear NeonFlux =P



Who's more foolish. The fool who leads. Or the fool who follows. 



And take a joke homeslice. I mean, damn. It's just a list I posted it here, for comedic reasons. Obvisouly, this humor is not for BSN. 

And quit gettin' all preachy on me. I mean, wow. 

Just. Wow. 


BSN, you never fail to entertain me. 

I 'mhere just for the lulz. Cyonan's responses are just the latest thing here to make me laugh. 

and for that good sir, I thank you. 

#12
RedArmyShogun

RedArmyShogun
  • Members
  • 6 273 messages
Why in the hell break it down so you have to come back every day to look? Hell with that.

#13
LTD

LTD
  • Members
  • 1 356 messages
Your link just generates a little more traffic and clicks to IGN's way..which is pretty much the onlt thing they care about.

When it comes to pure FPSing for sake of FPSing - portions of the genre, I don't remember seeing anything that'd imply any sort of evolution or innovation taking place since late 90s. Graphics get better and scripted lame explosions get bigger. That's about it.

Completely ignoring anything that came after Unreal Tournament 2003 sounds like a perfectly valid rule of thumb in my books. Afaik literally nothing has happened within the genre of "pure FPS" since then. Merit just isn't there.

With all this in mind, ofc it makes perfect sense to praise gemes and devs who even try to bring something interesting or ambitious to the mix. (Metroid, Deus Ex,Portal) Literally only things valid,interesting or relevant in COD or BF are their salen umbers. They both are the same goddamned game I've seen around since late 90s. Nothing in either game deserves some special recognition.

Also,,holy **** how unreadable piece of shït that list makes. I'm supposed to click through ONE HUNDRED tiny stupid stamp sized info boxes? Fuk off IGN, seriously.  I feel dirty for visiting them..I blame you, OP.

Modifié par LTD, 10 septembre 2013 - 12:25 .


#14
AventuroLegendary

AventuroLegendary
  • Members
  • 7 146 messages

NeonFlux117 wrote...

IGNorant.com is a common play on words that many gamers use to refer to ign.com.


That should be used to disparage their reviews, not their taste in games. There's nothing wrong with preferring one style of shooters over others.

Bandwagoners...

#15
Dominus

Dominus
  • Members
  • 15 426 messages
I skimmed the list. Some are respectable, most aren't what I would've chosen. Also keep in mind that they're only at the last 20 - the first 20 will be scrutinized more closely, I'm sure. And as said above, it's someone else's opinion, and that doesn't mean they're taking away all the enjoyment you had with your favorites.

I liked heretic quite a bit for its dark fantasy setting, but I wouldn't have put it in my top list, besides the near end(and I suppose they did for theirs). Never heard of SiN. AvP is respectable.

#16
Guest_Jayne126_*

Guest_Jayne126_*
  • Guests
Ah, I liked XIII.

Too bad they let it end with such a cliffhanger.

#17
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 374 messages

NeonFlux117 wrote...

Who's more foolish. The fool who leads. Or the fool who follows.



And take a joke homeslice. I mean, damn. It's just a list I posted it here, for comedic reasons. Obvisouly, this humor is not for BSN.

And quit gettin' all preachy on me. I mean, wow.

Just. Wow.


BSN, you never fail to entertain me.

I 'mhere just for the lulz. Cyonan's responses are just the latest thing here to make me laugh.

and for that good sir, I thank you.


Perhaps I should have taken a different approach, and understood that you do not yet grasp the concept of opinions that differ from yours?

You're giving me just as much entertainment as you claim I'm giving you.

#18
Ghost Lightning

Ghost Lightning
  • Members
  • 10 303 messages
Combat Evolved as #1 or gtfo

#19
Splinter Cell 108

Splinter Cell 108
  • Members
  • 3 254 messages

LTD wrote...

Your link just generates a little more traffic and clicks to IGN's way..which is pretty much the onlt thing they care about.

When it comes to pure FPSing for sake of FPSing - portions of the genre, I don't remember seeing anything that'd imply any sort of evolution or innovation taking place since late 90s. Graphics get better and scripted lame explosions get bigger. That's about it.

Completely ignoring anything that came after Unreal Tournament 2003 sounds like a perfectly valid rule of thumb in my books. Afaik literally nothing has happened within the genre of "pure FPS" since then. Merit just isn't there.

With all this in mind, ofc it makes perfect sense to praise gemes and devs who even try to bring something interesting or ambitious to the mix. (Metroid, Deus Ex,Portal) Literally only things valid,interesting or relevant in COD or BF are their salen umbers. They both are the same goddamned game I've seen around since late 90s. Nothing in either game deserves some special recognition.

Also,,holy **** how unreadable piece of shït that list makes. I'm supposed to click through ONE HUNDRED tiny stupid stamp sized info boxes? Fuk off IGN, seriously.  I feel dirty for visiting them..I blame you, OP.



I think its also quite interesting that they don't put all 100 games at once. Seems to me like they're trying to get views. I don't think picking out 100 games is really all that hard, at least not when it comes to IGN. they probably pick the games of the people who paid them the most. 

#20
RedArmyShogun

RedArmyShogun
  • Members
  • 6 273 messages

Ghost Lightning wrote...

Combat Evolved as #1 or gtfo



Goldeneye should be number one. Or at least in the top 10. It started the FPS game type after all.

#21
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests
Made it to Black. I'm not clicking through that. Yo IGN, did someone tell you that your format is wack?

#22
Ghost Lightning

Ghost Lightning
  • Members
  • 10 303 messages

RedArmyShogun wrote...

Ghost Lightning wrote...

Combat Evolved as #1 or gtfo



Goldeneye should be number one. Or at least in the top 10. It started the FPS game type after all.


True, but Halo is the reason it exists as it does today (two weapons and a grenade, regenerating health, etc.)

#23
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
That's the typical format for every "Top 100" list IGN publishes.

And OP, you gettin' trolled bro. LOL.

#24
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages

Ghost Lightning wrote...
Combat Evolved as #1 or gtfo

Don't be a dingbat, Timesplitters 2 is the best by far.

#25
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

Ghost Lightning wrote...

RedArmyShogun wrote...

Ghost Lightning wrote...

Combat Evolved as #1 or gtfo



Goldeneye should be number one. Or at least in the top 10. It started the FPS game type after all.


True

Not really