135 réponses à ce sujet

[Maverick827]

filetemo wrote...

explain to me why I need minimum 4gb of ram when I've never seen any game that uses more than 1.3 gb.

It's not like I'll be running photoshop while playing. Nowadays specs look bloated. Not only DA:I, but many others too.

A big problem with Skyrim modding is that the game will crash at around 3.1GB of RAM used.  People regularly reach this and would easily keep going if the engine allowed for it.

[Fishy]

Ryzaki wrote...

I've gotta i5 2500k @ 3.30 Ghz
8GB RAM
GTX 570
And 355GB free.

I only play at 1600x900 though so I'm hoping I can skirt by mostly on high settings.

Gonna need a new card soon.

*looks longingly at titan*

If only I could afford you.

Funny. I have the same spec and play every game at the best setting in 1080 P. Unless you only want to play at 60 FPS. I was thinking of upgrading to a 770 GTX, but those price are ridiculous. So i'm waiting and looking at what is going to happens after the ps4 is released. It's unacceptable for a '70 to be higher than 400 $.

Modifié par Suprez30, 10 septembre 2013 - 07:25 .

[MarchWaltz]

By the time DAI releases I should have a very affordable GTX 780 SLI. The price is going to go down by then.

But alas, there will be a GTX 9000 or something by then.

[Fishy]

MarchWaltz wrote...

By the time DAI releases I should have a very affordable GTX 780 SLI. The price is going to go down by then.

But alas, there will be a GTX 9000 or something by then.

LOL.
Buy a Ps4 .. 400 $ for 7 years.

[Milan92]

Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz

8 GB RAM

GeForce GTX 680

....

I guess High settings will be an option for me.

[Fishy]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...

What most people tend to forget when comparing system performance with Bf3 on Ultra is that simply turning HBAO to SSAO and reducing MSAA 4x to MSAA 2x and everything else left untouched will give a system a 15+ fps boost at minimal cost of graphical fidelity (and I mean nearly completely imperceptible during playing).

Exactly.. What those AA do it's make the game at a stupid high resolution like 3000 P or whatever and recompress it in 1080P to fight all jaggies. Those are straning hardware considerably and aren't doing much. The fidelity don't change very much when you drop it . AA is often the most demanding thing in PC. So don't be scared to pimp it down or use basic AA that are much less demanding.

[Fiery Phoenix]

MarchWaltz wrote...

By the time DAI releases I should have a very affordable GTX 780 SLI. The price is going to go down by then.

But alas, there will be a GTX 9000 or something by then.

GTX 780 SLI would be totally overkill unless you have a particularly large (30" and above) screen to maximize resolution. A single GTX 780 is more than enough to keep you going for the next 4-6 years, assuming you have a decent processor to accompany it.

On-topic: I wouldn't look at BF4 as a suitable benchmark, even if it uses the same engine. DA:I will most likely have lower recommended requirements.

[ForgottenWarrior]

My eyes cant see the differents between high and ultra settings. So i just stick with high on my 650ti, bf run like a bee with that in 1980x1080.

[Fishy]

Fiery Phoenix wrote...

MarchWaltz wrote...

By the time DAI releases I should have a very affordable GTX 780 SLI. The price is going to go down by then.

But alas, there will be a GTX 9000 or something by then.

GTX 780 SLI would be totally overkill unless you have a particularly large (30" and above) screen to maximize resolution. A single GTX 780 is more than enough to keep you going for the next 4-6 years, assuming you have a decent processor to accompany it.

On-topic: I wouldn't look at BF4 as a suitable benchmark, even if it uses the same engine. DA:I will most likely have lower recommended requirements.

What kind of cpu anyway you need for such gpu power ? i am so laughing when I see people with 1300 $ worth of vcard, but with a 300 $ cpu lol. What do they expect ?

The only reason those kind of setup could be used 100 % is with sophisticated ANTI-Aliasing and ridiculous high resolution(But most game does not even offer it). They can do what the hell they want with their money, but I am like a Qunari ... So much resource wasted. Just think . By the time your card power can be really used. New technology pop and your card is good for the trash bin

Modifié par Suprez30, 10 septembre 2013 - 08:10 .

[deuce985]

The specs are a pretty big leap over BF3. This isn't shocking though. When you leap into the next-generation PC requirements shoot up due to the new console hardware. It doesn't bother me. I'll have a new PC next year and my current one is just fine at running BF4 probably on medium settings.

It's possible DA:I will have higher requirements than this due to it being another year away. That means Bioware probably gets whatever new code advancements DICE puts on their engine.

Modifié par deuce985, 10 septembre 2013 - 08:09 .

[katerinafm]

I hope DA:I will be forgiving when it comes to computers that can't meet the recommended specs. My computer slightly exceeds the minimum requirements, and I'd like to have a smooth experience with DA:I without having to upgrade. Can we get an answer from a dev about how the game will run on older computers?

[Fishy]

deuce985 wrote...

The specs are a pretty big leap over BF3. This isn't shocking though. When you leap into the next-generation PC requirements shoot up due to the new console hardware. It doesn't bother me. I'll have a new PC next year and my current one is just fine at running BF4 probably on medium settings.

It's possible DA:I will have higher requirements than this due to it being another year away. That means Bioware probably gets whatever new code advancements DICE puts on their engine.

I don,t think we will see a big leap in hardware this gen to be honest. Nothing compared to 2005.

[Mr Cloud]

I'm still operating on XP. Lol.

[Fallstar]

By the time DA:I comes out, the price of the 'new' stuff like the GTX 700 series will have dropped significantly, so might as well wait to upgrade.

[Fiery Phoenix]

DuskWarden wrote...

By the time DA:I comes out, the price of the 'new' stuff like the GTX 700 series will have dropped significantly, so might as well wait to upgrade.

Nvidia is expected to launch the GTX 800 series next year, which is based on the Maxwell architecture (600 and 700 were both based on Kepler). I'd actually choose that over the current cards if I were to upgrade by the time DA:I comes out, but that's just me.

[Peer of the Empire]

Archaven wrote...

codenamesource wrote...

high-res textures and a 660 is mid-range not low end

It is very low end to me.. i would not even consider it except GTX770 and above. But GTX770 is the best bang for bucks IMO.

660 Ti / 760 level card is enough to max pretty much all games today at 1080p 60 fps, overlooking games like Rome 2.  Price / performance is also better than 770.

In the future there will be more taxing games; there will also be next gen cards.

[Wulfram]

Hmm, I generally beat the minimums reasonably comfortably but am well below the recommended. Probably about what I expected.

Main area of concern I guess would be RAM. Hopefully 4GB will be OK.

[PsychoticFox]

Thankfully my first copy of DAI will be on the Xbox and I'll look into PC copies later... hopefully when I have a PC that's actually spec'd for gaming.

Though admittedly I really have no idea if my tower could actually handle it. The laptop is working on perfecting her death throes so I highly doubt that she could. All I know is that Teeseven lags terribly on SR3 and a bit on ME3, so I only assume that he would choke on DAI.

[Ryzaki]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
What most people tend to forget when comparing system performance with Bf3 on Ultra is that simply turning HBAO to SSAO and reducing MSAA 4x to MSAA 2x and everything else left untouched will give a system a 15+ fps boost at minimal cost of graphical fidelity (and I mean nearly completely imperceptible during playing).


And like I said, I do not expect DAI to be anywhere near as graphically imposing and hardware hungry as Bf4 (if anything, the CPU requirement is a bit higher in general and the GPU requirements will be a good chunk lower!).



And if you're waiting for an upgrade, take a good long look at the upcoming AMD HD 9xxx series around the 2013/14 break. Not only are those new AMD GPUs slated to be really good from what I gathered from informations floating around on the net, but the resulting price war with nVidia will likely mean that the HD 7xxx series and the GTX 6xx series will get dirt cheap.

And a GTX 670 (which is actually CHEAPER than a GTX 660Ti right now in my region (WTF?)) or HD 7950 or better WILL run most games for the upcoming two years at maximum or close enough settings with no problems.

AH

True enough.

Good point. I hope they come sooner rather than later

XD those prices. True enough I probably should wait til next gen hits anyway to see if I need a card with a lot of RAM.

[Ryzaki]

Suprez30 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

I've gotta i5 2500k @ 3.30 Ghz
8GB RAM
GTX 570
And 355GB free.

I only play at 1600x900 though so I'm hoping I can skirt by mostly on high settings.

Gonna need a new card soon.

*looks longingly at titan*

If only I could afford you.

Funny. I have the same spec and play every game at the best setting in 1080 P. Unless you only want to play at 60 FPS. I was thinking of upgrading to a 770 GTX, but those price are ridiculous. So i'm waiting and looking at what is going to happens after the ps4 is released. It's unacceptable for a '70 to be higher than 400 $.

Maybe my card's just dusty. I'm half scared to open it though XD All I know is SR causes the heat to skyrocket and makes me scared of playing it for more than half an hour bursts.

Yeah I really want the 770 but 400+ dollars is my ehhhh point.

[AtreiyaN7]

I think my current system is fine - I have 16 GB of RAM, an i7 2920XM CPU, and two AMD Radeon 6990m cards (Crossfire), with Win 7 (64-bit).

Sure, I might upgrade to a system with two GTX 780m cards eventually (as I have read in reviews that 780m SLI gives you performance roughly equivalent to that of a single desktop Titan), but that's only happening if my current gaming laptop suddenly dies.

[theflyingzamboni]

My 580 should hopefully keep me going at high settings for another couple years, but we'll see. The Witcher 3 will probably be the biggest strain I'll encounter in that time. Good thing I don't have to worry about RAM before my computer dies, thanks to opting for those 16 cheap gigabytes. If only GPUs were so cheap...