J. Reezy wrote...
They should leave that niche
Why? It's a great specialty. No one else, or few if any, do it, while we have simply story-heavy games coming out of the industry's nose.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
J. Reezy wrote...
They should leave that niche
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
J. Reezy wrote...
That's what I meant.The Mad Hanar wrote...
J. Reezy wrote...
They should leave that niche
Or they could transcend it and create both.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Modifié par StreetMagic, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:13 .

alleyd wrote...
There has been much criticism of individual elements of the game, the ending, Crucible blah, blah. The main failure for me was the incorporation of the Reaper invasion as an intro. It was the single most dramatic element of the game in a human perspective but it was kind of glossed over in game and made the story illogical and incoherent as far as i was concerned.
Shepard is a soldier, not a diplomat or general and does not have the political clout to be a negotiator that other force would recognise. Also there would be a n intense amount of suspicion attached to Shepard after her sojourn as a representative of an avowed enemy of the Council forces. It is simply ludicrous format to think that the other races would be so ready to accept him.her as a representative.
The Reaper presence added little to the game other than some cheap attempts at drama and a couple of scripted battle sequences. In fact the Reapers as an enemy simply do not work in a shooter format, they're too powerful for hand held weapons to take down. Considering the game was centred around a Special forces type groundforce the enemy would need to be scaled accordingly to work.
I think the game would have been improved by removing the Reapers presence totally from game and continue by using indoctrinated thralls like Cerberus. Only I would have taken it further by having major races also having an indoctrinated storyline of sorts. it had already been established in ME2 that Harbinger could directly influence thralls from dark space, also that the Reapers had left indoctrination devices throughout the galaxy. It had already been established that these devices could create the Reaper monsters themselves in one of the earlier comics, in that storyline Turians were improved into Marauders or meta Turians. Having an Asari Matriarch, A Salarian Dalatrass and A Turian primarch leading seperatist factions against humanity and the use of Indoctrination devices could still introduce enemies such as Banshees etc.
I think it would have been more coherent to have the consequences of ME2 taken into account. Shepard's actions against the Batarians and in the Terminus systems should have been a trigger for war. It's simply unbelievable for any force to ignore the destruction of a colony and the widespread wave of death and destruction that followed in Shepard's wake. You could still start off the game with a war scenario without the Reapers.
Modifié par wolfhowwl, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:16 .
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Modifié par StreetMagic, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:20 .
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Shepard compared First Contact to the Genophage. Ya, that's the type of person you want in poltics.EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Modifié par StreetMagic, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:24 .
Compared to some American congressmen...Mr.House wrote...
Shepard compared First Contact to the Genophage. Ya, that's the type of person you want in poltics.EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Wut?StreetMagic wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Shepard isn't necessarily though. For whatever reason, Shepard might also be infamous. Al-Jilani calls him "once the darling of the Alliance, but now broken".. The Warden at Purgatory didn't seem to care you saved his people from destruction (if you bothered doing something like that at all). For whatever/unknown reason, you were more valuable as a prisoner. You're as valuable to him in the same way as Jack. I'm not saying why... it's up to you to fill in the blanks, but it's definitely not as clear cut as being a hero afterwards.
^This. The only Blue Xenos that I really liked.wolfhowwl wrote...
This Spectre would be on my squad.
Also having the Reaper invasion occur at the beginning of Mass Effect 3 was a huge mistake. This person wrote a good argument.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Mr.House wrote...
Shepard compared First Contact to the Genophage. Ya, that's the type of person you want in poltics.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Br3ad wrote...
Wut?StreetMagic wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Shepard isn't necessarily though. For whatever reason, Shepard might also be infamous. Al-Jilani calls him "once the darling of the Alliance, but now broken".. The Warden at Purgatory didn't seem to care you saved his people from destruction (if you bothered doing something like that at all). For whatever/unknown reason, you were more valuable as a prisoner. You're as valuable to him in the same way as Jack. I'm not saying why... it's up to you to fill in the blanks, but it's definitely not as clear cut as being a hero afterwards.
If Shepard were as valuable as Jack, he would have sold Jack a long time ago. Shepard is worth a lot more. Shepard's valuable because Shepard is Shepard. This unknown you are talking about does not exist,
Modifié par StreetMagic, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:28 .
That sounds like a personal attack against me. Reported. Reported twice.StreetMagic wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Wut?StreetMagic wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
^ I disagree wholly with that statement about Shepard not having the political clout to be a negotiator. Shepard saved the galaxy from a massive massive spaceship that a fleet couldn't even take down without it lowering its shields first. Millions saw that.
Hawke was the Champion of Kirkwall, the Warden was the Hero of Ferelden. I think you can truly say after ME1 that in the eyes of the galaxy Shepard is the Hero of the Galaxy.
Shepard isn't necessarily though. For whatever reason, Shepard might also be infamous. Al-Jilani calls him "once the darling of the Alliance, but now broken".. The Warden at Purgatory didn't seem to care you saved his people from destruction (if you bothered doing something like that at all). For whatever/unknown reason, you were more valuable as a prisoner. You're as valuable to him in the same way as Jack. I'm not saying why... it's up to you to fill in the blanks, but it's definitely not as clear cut as being a hero afterwards.
If Shepard were as valuable as Jack, he would have sold Jack a long time ago. Shepard is worth a lot more. Shepard's valuable because Shepard is Shepard. This unknown you are talking about does not exist,
Damnit. Don't be like David and take my words too literally. I'm just trying to get in a post as quick as possible and speaking shorthand a bit. The point was Shep was valuable. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
StreetMagic wrote...
Shepard isn't necessarily though. For whatever reason, Shepard might also be infamous. Al-Jilani calls him "once the darling of the Alliance, but now broken".. The Warden at Purgatory didn't seem to care you saved his people from destruction (if you bothered doing something like that at all). For whatever/unknown reason, you were more valuable as a prisoner. You're as valuable to him in the same way as Jack. I'm not saying why... it's up to you to fill in the blanks, but it's definitely not as clear cut as being a hero after the events of ME1.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
EntropicAngel wrote...
StreetMagic wrote...
Shepard isn't necessarily though. For whatever reason, Shepard might also be infamous. Al-Jilani calls him "once the darling of the Alliance, but now broken".. The Warden at Purgatory didn't seem to care you saved his people from destruction (if you bothered doing something like that at all). For whatever/unknown reason, you were more valuable as a prisoner. You're as valuable to him in the same way as Jack. I'm not saying why... it's up to you to fill in the blanks, but it's definitely not as clear cut as being a hero after the events of ME1.
Al-Jilani is a media hack who's deliberately trying to tick Shepard off and get him to mess up. The Warden of Purgatory was in his job for the money--it shouldn't be a major surprise that he decides to sell Shep out.
Politicians are in it either for the good of the people (hopefully) or the popularity/power, not money. Shepard is good for both.
Modifié par StreetMagic, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:34 .
Guest_StreetMagic_*
David7204 wrote...
I'm unsure how exactly you think Ashley or Al-Jilani "****s" with me.
You see, David, when a man and a women, or two, love each other very much.....David7204 wrote...
I'm unsure how exactly you think Ashley or Al-Jilani "****s" with me.
StreetMagic wrote...
David7204 wrote...
I'm unsure how exactly you think Ashley or Al-Jilani "****s" with me.
Who gives a **** what you're unsure about.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
StreetMagic wrote...
She's not necessarily a hack. In ME1 especially, her concerns were legit (and ME3, for that matter). Just like Ashley's, I'd say. They're there to be antagonists to Paragons specifically. Bioware knows their main fanbase all too well, and how they'll do the "heroic"/noble thing if given the option. So they put those characters in to **** with them.
I'm getting off the point though.
Modifié par EntropicAngel, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:43 .