193 réponses à ce sujet

[Supreme Leech]

They're legitimately difficult for the most part, so I can't complain about the collectors too much. But, those praetorian lasers are seriously glitched and very annoying.

[Computron2000]

Sebastianthorson wrote...

Computron2000 wrote...

I do UUG all the time. UUG = collectors can show up. Lets see, should i tailor my loadout for all 4 factions or should i tailor it for 3?

 Lolwut?

 

Btw i'm in my "play engineers" phase now so if you're saying engineers are purely weapon based, please tell me so i can be entertained

So, basically, what you`re saying is "I can play power class against collectors and it somehow proves they aren`t harder for power classes"?

In case you forgot, here is what you said "Personally I don`t like how collectors show that depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers is the way to go. Variety? Tactics? Synergy? Screw it, carrier for everybody! "

Tell me again how engineers are "depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers".

Perhaps you should consider amending your statement to " and i need to depend purely on weapons with 0 active powers because i don't understand collectors"

[em-ily]

 I haven't played much against the collectors but I think they are not that hard. I agree, however, that the scions and praetorians can be dirty cheaters. I haven't been killed by praetorian laser through a wall but if you take cover while he [or it rather] shoots, it doesn't do damage. I do usually host so maybe that's why I haven't encoutered these bugs. 

[Sebastianthorson]

Computron2000 wrote...

In case you forgot, here is what you said "Personally I don`t like how collectors show that depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers is the way to go. Variety? Tactics? Synergy? Screw it, carrier for everybody! "

Tell me again how engineers are "depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers".

Perhaps you should consider amending your statement to " and i need to depend purely on weapons with 0 active powers because i don't understand collectors"

Flamerless geth trooper w/Harrier doesn`t give a damn about faction he is facing - Harrier is equally effective against all factions... OK, you might also want to bring Acolyte with you if you host (for Phantoms). 
Adept w/Acolyte, depending on his powers and BEs for killing, is sugnificantly less effective against collectors because of seeker swarms and Praetorian bubble. 
So If you want to JDGAF about faction you`re facing - play as weapons platform with biggest possible gun.

Modifié par Sebastianthorson, 12 septembre 2013 - 10:54 .

[koschwarz74]

The only faction that still can thrill me a little in this game.

[Deerber]

Element 0 wrote...

*stuff*

Why on Earth are you using an Indra on the Shadow?

[Computron2000]

Sebastianthorson wrote...

Computron2000 wrote...

In case you forgot, here is what you said "Personally I don`t like how collectors show that depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers is the way to go. Variety? Tactics? Synergy? Screw it, carrier for everybody! "

Tell me again how engineers are "depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers".

Perhaps you should consider amending your statement to " and i need to depend purely on weapons with 0 active powers because i don't understand collectors"

Flamerless geth trooper w/Harrier doesn`t give a damn about faction he is facing - Harrier is equally effective against all factions... OK, you might also want to bring Acolyte with you if you host (for Phantoms). 
Adept w/Acolyte, depending on his powers and BEs for killing, is sugnificantly less effective against collectors because of seeker swarms and Praetorian bubble. 
So If you want to JDGAF about faction you`re facing - play as weapons platform with biggest possible gun.

Literally demostrating what i had already said (GT is a soldier by the way...)

Computron2000 wrote...
Personally i like how collectors show that depending purely on powers with weak weapons isn't the best idea especially those still stuck on the 200% CD notion.

[me0120]

Element 0 wrote...

Deerber wrote...

Element 0 wrote...

*stuff*

Why on Earth are you using an Indra on the Shadow?

 

Wat? Look at the pic and the kill feed again

They introduced "holes" in that map where enemy AoE projectiles can go through with one of the last updates. I think one of the devs confirmed it and said they let it slip but there was nothing they could do now. 

[LemurFromTheId]

Two things.

1) You all talk about seekers as if they weren't easily avoided. Why?

2) Even if you focus on active powers, there's just no excuse not to bring a good gun with you.

[Fortack]

Aedolon wrote...

Two things.

1) You all talk about seekers as if they weren't easily avoided. Why?

2) Even if you focus on active powers, there's just no excuse not to bring a good gun with you.

1) Because real men charge headlong into spawns to kill the lot AND you will get seeker-swarmed that way. Only cowards run away and hide.

2) Agreed

[Sebastianthorson]

Computron2000 wrote...



Literally demostrating what i had already said (GT is a soldier by the way...)

Computron2000 wrote...
Personally i like how collectors show that depending purely on powers with weak weapons isn't the best idea especially those still stuck on the 200% CD notion.

Y U HATE POWER SPAMMERS?
Seriously, it`s common kowledge that weapons>>>powers in ME3 MP, and the best powers are the ones that make weapons even better (tac cloak, marksman, AR, any primer for warp ammo..). Weapons-weapons-weapons. Why is GI so OP? Because weapon DPS. Why Hunterss is not that great, even considering her great power damage? Because she can only boost her weapon damage output by Warp, her tactical cloak doesn`t work this way.

And collectors emphasize this weapon focus even more.

[me0120]

Element 0 wrote...

me0120 wrote...

Element 0 wrote...

Deerber wrote...

Element 0 wrote...

*stuff*

Why on Earth are you using an Indra on the Shadow?

 

Wat? Look at the pic and the kill feed again

They introduced "holes" in that map where enemy AoE projectiles can go through with one of the last updates. I think one of the devs confirmed it and said they let it slip but there was nothing they could do now. 

 

I know Banshee warps can go trough and I know Praetorian missiles can go trough in some maps like here: 

youtu.be/EdEKaK1b7LY
 
And I'm willing to let it slide. But laz0rs do that on multiple maps and often so eff em. Lrn2code biower. 

Lol I only play squishies so I get insta-downed when I'm not vigilant. After learning their techniques for targeting they became one of the easiest bosses 1v1 since with a quick class they'll always be shooting where you were. (Possessed not withstanding. There's a special place in a Cerberus laboratory where they deserve to be kept)

[Computron2000]

Sebastianthorson wrote...

Computron2000 wrote...
Literally demostrating what i had already said (GT is a soldier by the way...)

Computron2000 wrote...
Personally i like how collectors show that depending purely on powers with weak weapons isn't the best idea especially those still stuck on the 200% CD notion.

Y U HATE POWER SPAMMERS?
Seriously, it`s common kowledge that weapons>>>powers in ME3 MP, and the best powers are the ones that make weapons even better (tac cloak, marksman, AR, any primer for warp ammo..). Weapons-weapons-weapons. Why is GI so OP? Because weapon DPS. Why Hunterss is not that great, even considering her great power damage? Because she can only boost her weapon damage output by Warp, her tactical cloak doesn`t work this way.

And collectors emphasize this weapon focus even more.

So now you're saying that i am right.

Computron2000 wrote...
Personally i like how collectors show that depending purely on powers with weak weapons isn't the best idea especially those still stuck on the 200% CD notion.

Or are you still trying to say that power classes are useless and you should be "depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers".(as quoted from you)

Again like i said

Computron2000 wrote...
I do UUG all the time. UUG = collectors can show up. Lets see, should i tailor my loadout for all 4 factions or should i tailor it for 3?

Adept w/Acolyte. Great idea for 3 factions or 4?

Logical solution is as follows.
i) Never play UUG. Always fix enemy. Leave collector matches immediately
ii) Redesign your loadout to handle all factions

[Sebastianthorson]

 

Computron2000 wrote...

So now you're saying that i am right. 

 I`m saying that I don`t understand why you think that making this game so weapon-centric was a great idea.

Or are you still trying to say that power classes are useless and you should be "depending purely on weapons with 0 active powers".

 They are not useless - but they are suboptimal. Underpowered.

Again like i said

Adept w/Acolyte. Great idea for 3 factions or 4?

 Great idea for 0 factions, good for 3, not very good but can still work for 1. OTOH, Typhoon destroyer is a great idea for all 4. Destroyer is also less fun and more repetitive than, say, smashdept. 


 

Logical solution is as follows.
i) Never play UUG. Always fix enemy. Leave collector matches immediately
ii) Redesign your loadout to handle all factions

I can handle all factions, thank you. I just prefer high risk - high reward system to high risk - mediocre reward/low risk - high reward one we currently have. It`s more fun.

Modifié par Sebastianthorson, 12 septembre 2013 - 12:48 .

[VaultingFrog]

This thread needs some more thunderdome.

[Moby]

megabeast37215 wrote...

MofuggerX wrote...

guise

1v1

ME3 1v1s are retarded. PvP or STFU

guise

mechwarrior