Aller au contenu

Photo

ME4: Which would you prefer?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
90 réponses à ce sujet

#1
liggy002

liggy002
  • Members
  • 5 337 messages
Choose one:

1. The next ME is set sometime after the events of Mass Effect 3 (specifically say whether you would prefer the game to take place not long after the events of ME3 or far in the future).

2. The next ME is set before the events of the Mass Effect Trilogy.

3. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME3.

4. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME1 or ME2 but before ME3.

5. The next ME is set in an alternate Universe but it still has the alien races we have come to know and love.

6. None of the above:  Just make a game about Harbinger blowing stuff up.  (LOL, I had to throw that one in there.)

#2
liggy002

liggy002
  • Members
  • 5 337 messages
I actually choose a combination of 3 and 6.

#3
Astartes Marine

Astartes Marine
  • Members
  • 1 615 messages
Option 5 sounds like the JJ Abrams route, technically a reboot but not specifically a reboot. Something like that could be interesting if only to see how differently events could play out like Batarians being the nice guys that everyone likes instead of the Asari, Turians being outcasts instead of the Krogan, the Rachni war never occurring when they are discovered, etc etc.

I could grow to like the concept...but I still want an RTS. I want my army of Krogan!

#4
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 626 messages
1 - 200 years or thereabouts.

#5
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

liggy002 wrote...

I actually choose a combination of 3 and 6.

O rly? From you, liggy? I don't believe that at all. It's not like you make threads about this all the time. 

#6
SNascimento

SNascimento
  • Members
  • 6 002 messages
Something 5.

Either that, or a far, far future.

#7
liggy002

liggy002
  • Members
  • 5 337 messages

Br3ad wrote...

liggy002 wrote...

I actually choose a combination of 3 and 6.

O rly? From you, liggy? I don't believe that at all. It's not like you make threads about this all the time. 



Not necessarily about 3... it's just that I wanted a different ME3.

#8
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages
Distant future.

#9
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 288 messages
Alternate universe

#10
Guest_Miscellaneous Mind_*

Guest_Miscellaneous Mind_*
  • Guests
I'd prefer for the game not to be made, but if I had to choose one, it would be all of the above.

#11
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

liggy002 wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

liggy002 wrote...

I actually choose a combination of 3 and 6.

O rly? From you, liggy? I don't believe that at all. It's not like you make threads about this all the time. 



Not necessarily about 3... it's just that I wanted a different ME3.

You and I both know that this isn't true. That you have suggested this idea before. Admitance is the first step towards getting over your problems. 

#12
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages
I'm inclined to go for #1, sometime far enough into the future where pan-galactic travel is at least functional again. Also, everyone from the original trilogy should be dead or really really old by then. The new game needs to let some new characters shine.

#13
TheVanishedOne

TheVanishedOne
  • Members
  • 476 messages

liggy002 wrote...

Choose one:

1. The next ME is set sometime after the events of Mass Effect 3 (specifically say whether you would prefer the game to take place not long after the events of ME3 or far in the future).

2. The next ME is set before the events of the Mass Effect Trilogy.

3. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME3.

4. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME1 or ME2 but before ME3.

5. The next ME is set in an alternate Universe but it still has the alien races we have come to know and love.

6. None of the above:  Just make a game about Harbinger blowing stuff up.  (LOL, I had to throw that one in there.)


1. ME4 should be far in the furture because it'd make a peaceful time (after reapers were defeated) short.

3. It'd be cool to be someone during ME3 ground war in many planets.

I do not agree with 2, 4, and 5.

2. IMO, I do NOT want anyone before Commander Shepard.

4. IMO, ME1 & 2 should focus on only Shepard.

5. It is highly possible that BioWare won't put that much effort to create a game about another Universe.

#14
Mcfly616

Mcfly616
  • Members
  • 8 988 messages
2 or 5

#15
lecho_himself

lecho_himself
  • Members
  • 165 messages
1. Let the galaxy rebuild process begin!

#16
RZIBARA

RZIBARA
  • Members
  • 4 066 messages
1. Set 100 years after destroy. Geth still alive, citadel and relays repaired, genophage cured, peace on rannoch, rachni alive.

#17
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 114 messages

liggy002 wrote...

Choose one:

1. The next ME is set sometime after the events of Mass Effect 3 (specifically say whether you would prefer the game to take place not long after the events of ME3 or far in the future).

2. The next ME is set before the events of the Mass Effect Trilogy.

3. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME3.

4. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME1 or ME2 but before ME3.

5. The next ME is set in an alternate Universe but it still has the alien races we have come to know and love.

6. None of the above:  Just make a game about Harbinger blowing stuff up.  (LOL, I had to throw that one in there.)


Box no.1 wins for me, set longafter ME3, completely new cast of characters
Can't stand the idea of a pointless midquel.

#18
YourFleshIsMine

YourFleshIsMine
  • Members
  • 91 messages
I'd like the game to pick up with famous writer Ashley Williams finishing reading the last page of the fictional Shepard trilogy she wrote out loud to a group of fans at a convention. The ending depends on your choices from the ME trilogy before. After this short cut scene you realise that you are one of the fans and then something terrible happens happens...you are then guided to create your own character and then the real story starts, which could be something completely different in the same but alternate universe from the ME trilogy.

#19
TNT1991

TNT1991
  • Members
  • 796 messages
I like #1 the most. I would like the series to move forward, no matter how many years it takes place after the war.

I would hate #2-4, like DA2, I don't want to be reminded of the previous games (no matter how better or worse ME4 turns out to be) and just focus on ME4 itself; without reminding me of Shepard and wishing that I should play ME1-3 instead. Plus, I want to move away from the Reaper plot. As for #2, I can't stand prequels.

I'm undecided about #5...

#20
Clips7

Clips7
  • Members
  • 1 926 messages
#1...progress the story and develop a new threat with new characters...it can't possibly be as big or as epic as the reaper storyline, but i saw somebody on these forums with a storyline idea concerning dark energy and how some new entity has found a way to harness it and threaten the galaxy with it...something along those lines would be a good start...

I absolutely hate prequels tho....especially for this series since we already know what happens in the end...it also makes no sense to develop a game during the events of ME2 or 3...why backtrack and develop backstories for major plotlines that we have already played and finished?...just progress the story forward...

#21
_FLANDERS

_FLANDERS
  • Members
  • 172 messages
hero a live, new Anderson mentor to who ever, has his girlfriend from 2 or 3.problem still out there.

#22
SAmaster01

SAmaster01
  • Members
  • 192 messages
Number One, and I think it should be 5-25 years later, or at least far away enough to erase the effects of the old games and be it's own story, but not far away enough that everyone is dead.

#23
Bossnormandy

Bossnormandy
  • Members
  • 63 messages

liggy002 wrote...

Choose one:

1. The next ME is set sometime after the events of Mass Effect 3 (specifically say whether you would prefer the game to take place not long after the events of ME3 or far in the future).

2. The next ME is set before the events of the Mass Effect Trilogy.

3. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME3.

4. The next ME is set sometime during the events of ME1 or ME2 but before ME3.

5. The next ME is set in an alternate Universe but it still has the alien races we have come to know and love.

6. None of the above:  Just make a game about Harbinger blowing stuff up.  (LOL, I had to throw that one in there.)


I choose 1, preferably 50ish years in the future, but I'll buy whatever they come up with except for a prequel..if they make any prequels they should just make them FPS offshoots that are outside of the actual mass effect franchise and get a different team/funding so that the rest of us still get our true Mass Effect fix (since we already know the conclusion of all the conflicts, I think it'd be really hard to get immersed in the story)

Everyone seems to assume there will be long-lived peace after the Reaper invasion...I tend to think the stresses of everyone trying to rebuild their homeworlds would cause a lot of tension as each race would likely feel entitled to the scarce resources that everyone so desperately needs...I suppose this kind of assumes you choose destroy since synthesis everything/everyone lives happily ever after

#24
Tonymac

Tonymac
  • Members
  • 4 307 messages
For ME4, I would prefer a few things.

4) Write a good story / trilogy even if you make only one game. (less plotholes)
5) Produce it but don't hype it through the statosphere. Be honest and constructive.
6) Do not lie to the fans
7) No day one DLC

As far as I can tell though, its a done deal for Mass Effect. Any thing that happens after ME3 will be wrecked by the events of ME3, no matter what path anyone chose.

Basically, Bioware is better off not making any more mass effect games.

:ph34r:[Inappropriate comments removed.]:ph34r:

Modifié par Ninja Stan, 13 septembre 2013 - 07:31 .


#25
Farangbaa

Farangbaa
  • Members
  • 6 757 messages

Tonymac wrote...
6) Do not lie to the fans


Because advertisement and commercials never lie.

My god man.