Qunari horns and horn jewelry. I want to decide between being hornless like Sten (I probably never will unless there's alt dialog, but I want the option), removed horns like saarabas or tal-vashoth, and so forth. And then I want to decorate them.
Character Customisation You Want
Débuté par
PinkShoes
, sept. 13 2013 10:49
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 12:42
Karlone123
-
- Members
- 2 029 messages
Style of Qunari horns, from the Arishok's to a Sarabass cut off horns.
#28
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 12:58
ShadoWolf-
-
- Members
- 3 messages
Loads of new hair styles, more face / body tattoos, bust size adjust, muscle size adjust, way much more eye colors, many beards, more scars to face / body. Pretty much these! Oh. And weight / height adjust.
#30
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 01:11
fchopin
-
- Members
- 5 060 messages
I like to customise the whole body not just the face.
#31
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 01:14
RPGmom28
-
- Members
- 1 466 messages
My biggest issue and concern is that there are a lot of good looking feature options. It's not that I want my character to be the best looking creature ever born. It's that in Mass Effect and Dragon Age there are only a few attractive features, and the rest are weird and I don't use them very much. I've tried before just for variety and end up abandoning a save because I hate how my character looks. So a lot of my Shepards/Wardens tend to look alike, with minor changes such as hair and eye color and hairstyles.
#33
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 01:17
animedreamer
-
- Members
- 3 055 messages
Height / Weight, since this wont happen..
Eye Shapes, god please let them remember to have more than 4.
Actual good looking pre-sets. Yes its fun to make a totally original face, but every once and awhile you want your character to actually look like they belong in the same universe as the npcs. Think about Saints Row 3 and 4, no matter how skilled you are at making your toon, they do not look as detailed or fit as well as the actually NPC's. Same can be said of the Mass Effect games as well, though in ME3 it wasn't as bad. Of course a lot of the reason behind this is because the npcs are based on real life models, so maybe have the default character and 3 to 4 pre-sets be based on real life models, even if it's only people from around the office would be nice as well, along with one blank canvas face.
Female Quanri, I want the option, even if it doesn't make sense. Female Kossith just to satisfy my curiousity.
Breast Expansion, lol j/k .... maybe.
Eye Shapes, god please let them remember to have more than 4.
Actual good looking pre-sets. Yes its fun to make a totally original face, but every once and awhile you want your character to actually look like they belong in the same universe as the npcs. Think about Saints Row 3 and 4, no matter how skilled you are at making your toon, they do not look as detailed or fit as well as the actually NPC's. Same can be said of the Mass Effect games as well, though in ME3 it wasn't as bad. Of course a lot of the reason behind this is because the npcs are based on real life models, so maybe have the default character and 3 to 4 pre-sets be based on real life models, even if it's only people from around the office would be nice as well, along with one blank canvas face.
Female Quanri, I want the option, even if it doesn't make sense. Female Kossith just to satisfy my curiousity.
Breast Expansion, lol j/k .... maybe.
Modifié par animedreamer, 13 septembre 2013 - 02:06 .
#34
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 01:34
DarkSpider88
-
- Members
- 1 504 messages
While height and build adjustments may be out of the questions, having two or three body presets for each race would be a nice compromise. Like I want to be able to play as an imposing and statuesque Aveline, or a body shape like Isabella to give my inquisitor a persuasion bonus.
#35
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 01:58
happy_daiz
-
- Members
- 7 963 messages
I would love to see everything that's in Dragon's Dogma's cc.
Everything.
Height, weight, scars, face paint, boob slider, tons of hairstyles, skin and makeup colors, appendage selection (you get to pick what your arms, legs, torso, etc. looks like), stance, you name it.
The nice thing is that in DD, every armor fits every size, and every cutscene shows your character and pawns perfectly wearing said armors. This shouldn't be outside the realm of possibility, with the new engine.
Everything.
Height, weight, scars, face paint, boob slider, tons of hairstyles, skin and makeup colors, appendage selection (you get to pick what your arms, legs, torso, etc. looks like), stance, you name it.
The nice thing is that in DD, every armor fits every size, and every cutscene shows your character and pawns perfectly wearing said armors. This shouldn't be outside the realm of possibility, with the new engine.
Modifié par happy_daiz, 13 septembre 2013 - 02:21 .
#36
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:01
luna1124
-
- Members
- 7 649 messages
^^If this happens, it may take me a week to create a character^^^ 
#37
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:19
sandalisthemaker
-
- Members
- 5 387 messages
I really hope that people with aesthetic sensibilities are responsible for designing the CC, so that creating detailed, well-balanced, and proportionate faces isn't a monumentally difficult task.
I would like to see:
A variety of believable eye shapes, and not ones that are distorted and elongated to the point where they can't be used without making the character look like a freak or a fish spawn. Really, there were only 2 eyes that could be used in DA2 that didn't make the PC look frightening.
A greater variety of facial features and skin tones, so that we can create great looking characters that look totally different from one another.
Beard options that have a well-maintained appearance- longer than stubble, yet not ridiculously long and bushy. (Something in between stubble and default Hawke's beard would be nice.)
Body sliders. They don't have to be extreme, but the ability to make slightly more skinny and slightly more muscular characters would be nice.
I would like to see:
A variety of believable eye shapes, and not ones that are distorted and elongated to the point where they can't be used without making the character look like a freak or a fish spawn. Really, there were only 2 eyes that could be used in DA2 that didn't make the PC look frightening.
A greater variety of facial features and skin tones, so that we can create great looking characters that look totally different from one another.
Beard options that have a well-maintained appearance- longer than stubble, yet not ridiculously long and bushy. (Something in between stubble and default Hawke's beard would be nice.)
Body sliders. They don't have to be extreme, but the ability to make slightly more skinny and slightly more muscular characters would be nice.
Modifié par sandalisthemaker, 13 septembre 2013 - 02:21 .
#38
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:19
Degenerate Rakia Time
-
- Banned
- 5 073 messages
To add to my previous comment - i want beards for elves, i'd really like to be an elf but i cant play a character without a beard 
#39
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:24
Navasha
-
- Members
- 3 724 messages
Mods I have always used in the past two games included more hairstyles, hair & eye colors, etc. Would be nice to have these available right at the beginning.
#40
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:30
In Exile
-
- Members
- 28 738 messages
1) Better clean shaven options for humans. Unless you picked a preset in DA:O/DA2 that was clean shaven and then didn't mess around with the facial hair you were stuck with that weird Alistiar like chin thing.
2) Opportunity to be hornless as a qunari.
2) Opportunity to be hornless as a qunari.
Modifié par In Exile, 13 septembre 2013 - 02:30 .
#41
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:37
RinpocheSchnozberry
-
- Members
- 6 212 messages
It took BSN two pages to get to booty and booby sliders? This place has done down hill since I went inactive. smh.
I believe Gaider posted about playing SR3 a while back, so hopefully he was inspired to suggest stealing that CC during dev. The Frostbite graphics we've seen plus SR3/4 level CC would be amazing.
I believe Gaider posted about playing SR3 a while back, so hopefully he was inspired to suggest stealing that CC during dev. The Frostbite graphics we've seen plus SR3/4 level CC would be amazing.
#42
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:41
fchopin
-
- Members
- 5 060 messages
luna1124 wrote...
^^If this happens, it may take me a week to create a character^^^
If we can save our creations so we can reuse them would be worth it.
#43
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:51
Deflagratio
-
- Members
- 2 513 messages
happy_daiz wrote...
I would love to see everything that's in Dragon's Dogma's cc.
Everything.
Height, weight, scars, face paint, boob slider, tons of hairstyles, skin and makeup colors, appendage selection (you get to pick what your arms, legs, torso, etc. looks like), stance, you name it.
The nice thing is that in DD, every armor fits every size, and every cutscene shows your character and pawns perfectly wearing said armors. This shouldn't be outside the realm of possibility, with the new engine.
DD looked and ran like ass for a reason. Every separate and variable asset you need to render is just another load choking down the hardware. And considering DD's poor character models and mediocre-to-decent environments...
It's hard to say that these ideas are "Bad" but what are you really willing to sacrifice in order to attain them? Would you drop from 60FPS to 30FPS? Lower the number of potential actors on screen at any given time? Scale back the LoD Draw?
Sorry for buzzkillington.jpg attitude. But pipe dreams can quickly color expectation.
#44
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 02:59
In Exile
-
- Members
- 28 738 messages
fchopin wrote...
If we can save our creations so we can reuse them would be worth it.
Facecodes are a must.
#45
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:01
animedreamer
-
- Members
- 3 055 messages
They have to add a face code/body code generator like Mass Effect so we can easily share our creations online with the community.
#46
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:17
happy_daiz
-
- Members
- 7 963 messages
Wow, your experience and my experience were polar opposites.Deflagratio wrote...
happy_daiz wrote...
I would love to see everything that's in Dragon's Dogma's cc.
Everything.
Height, weight, scars, face paint, boob slider, tons of hairstyles, skin and makeup colors, appendage selection (you get to pick what your arms, legs, torso, etc. looks like), stance, you name it.
The nice thing is that in DD, every armor fits every size, and every cutscene shows your character and pawns perfectly wearing said armors. This shouldn't be outside the realm of possibility, with the new engine.
DD looked and ran like ass for a reason. Every separate and variable asset you need to render is just another load choking down the hardware. And considering DD's poor character models and mediocre-to-decent environments...
The game did not 'run like ass' for me. I do not experience crashes, lags, errors, corruption, nothing. I have over 600 hours in on two playthroughs, so I'd think that if something like that was going to happen, it probably would have by now. Maybe you had a conflict with your hardware?
Sure, I have the occasional glitch when accessing the server, but they're few and far between. It would be unrealistic to expect otherwise.
DD also did not 'look like ass' to me. Sure, not everything was impeccably done, but the character models were better than a lot of modern rpgs out there. Everything else I thought was really well done. The boss and "larger" enemies are fantastic, and are something I'd like to see used in other games.
So regarding the look, were you referring to the landscape? Or maybe the enemies? Or maybe your own character model? You didn't specify, so I have no idea what to address. I don't have any complaints regarding visuals for the player character or pawn, aside from the hands (and some of the hair types). Sometimes they looked good, and others, not so much. It depended on which armor you were using.
Are you a PC player? Funny, I didn't think DD was available on PC, but what do I know. ;-) I don't experience framerate issues on my 360 with DD. I'd be curious to know where this happens to you, and how long ago it was. There may have been patches to address it since you played.It's hard to say that these ideas are "Bad" but what are you really willing to sacrifice in order to attain them? Would you drop from 60FPS to 30FPS? Lower the number of potential actors on screen at any given time? Scale back the LoD Draw?
Sorry for buzzkillington.jpg attitude. But pipe dreams can quickly color expectation.
Back on topic, my point in all of this was to reference a game that had these aspects already. I don't think it's off-base to hope that a game newer than that, with a more capable engine, could handle these customization options.
Modifié par happy_daiz, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:18 .
#47
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:21
Nefla
-
- Members
- 7 672 messages
Realistic hopes: Mouth options like the MassEffect series. I hated that Hawke only had 1 mouth and the only thing you could change was lip thickness and height on the face. Also more and better hairstyles with no throwaway har that's to ugly or poorly done to use such as in DA2 the one with the anime wannabe spikes that was just poorly modeled or the round pumpkin with 3 stooges bangs. Adding to that I wish they would learn to do bangs well.
Unrealistic: body sliders, height sliders (a certain range for each race), body tattoos, face and body scars.
Unrealistic: body sliders, height sliders (a certain range for each race), body tattoos, face and body scars.
#48
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:26
hoorayforicecream
-
- Members
- 3 420 messages
I would like the ability to create a human character who looks non-caucasian in features. I'm a little tired of character creation where the options all look caucasian except for skin coloration changes.
#49
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:30
jones0901
-
- Members
- 242 messages
haircuts at camp, warpaint, scars from injuries like fable (that you can have fixed for money)
all customization done through a camp interface like in red dead redemption
and a mohawk
all customization done through a camp interface like in red dead redemption
and a mohawk
Modifié par jones0901, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:30 .
#50
Posté 13 septembre 2013 - 03:35
Deflagratio
-
- Members
- 2 513 messages
happy_daiz wrote...
Wow, your experience and my experience were polar opposites.Deflagratio wrote...
happy_daiz wrote...
I would love to see everything that's in Dragon's Dogma's cc.
Everything.
Height, weight, scars, face paint, boob slider, tons of hairstyles, skin and makeup colors, appendage selection (you get to pick what your arms, legs, torso, etc. looks like), stance, you name it.
The nice thing is that in DD, every armor fits every size, and every cutscene shows your character and pawns perfectly wearing said armors. This shouldn't be outside the realm of possibility, with the new engine.
DD looked and ran like ass for a reason. Every separate and variable asset you need to render is just another load choking down the hardware. And considering DD's poor character models and mediocre-to-decent environments...
The game did not 'run like ass' for me. I do not experience crashes, lags, errors, corruption, nothing. I have over 600 hours in on two playthroughs, so I'd think that if something like that was going to happen, it probably would have by now. Maybe you had a conflict with your hardware?
Sure, I have the occasional glitch when accessing the server, but they're few and far between. It would be unrealistic to expect otherwise.
I'd drop significantly (But the game was still playable) in Frame Rate whenever there was another pawn on screen. That's kind of how I am tying it into visual variables with the character models... It could be the processor time getting drained by the AI... Which is Ironic because pawn AI is braindead.
DD also did not 'look like ass' to me. Sure, not everything was impeccably done, but the character models were better than a lot of modern rpgs out there. Everything else I thought was really well done. The boss and "larger" enemies are fantastic, and are something I'd like to see used in other games.
Ass was a bit hyperbolic I'll admit. It's far better than some of the other games out there, but also far inferior to an equal number of games, including RPGs. You can tell most of the care went into the Boss Encounters though. Not even mighty Skyrim compares to slaying even the Griffon. Too bad the enemies pretty much get ripped straight out of D&D3.5 Monster Manuals with virtually no original twist. (See: Dark Souls for how to do "Rippin' off D&D right")
So regarding the look, were you referring to the landscape? Or maybe the enemies? Or maybe your own character model? You didn't specify, so I have no idea what to address. I don't have any complaints regarding visuals for the player character or pawn, aside from the hands (and some of the hair types). Sometimes they looked good, and others, not so much. It depended on which armor you were using.
If your definition of "Good" character models is low poly and muddy textures, I envy your lack of exposure.
It's hard to say that these ideas are "Bad" but what are you really willing to sacrifice in order to attain them? Would you drop from 60FPS to 30FPS? Lower the number of potential actors on screen at any given time? Scale back the LoD Draw?
Sorry for buzzkillington.jpg attitude. But pipe dreams can quickly color expectation.
Are you a PC player? Funny, I didn't think DD was available on PC, but what do I know. ;-) I don't experience framerate issues on my 360 with DD. I'd be curious to know where this happens to you, and how long ago it was. There may have been patches to address it since you played.
Not sure what you're getting at here. Maybe you're not reading in context or didn't understand I was speaking in hypothetical for this statement.
I'm not trying to bring down DD or anything, it's a novel, flawed and entertaining experience. The kind of game that somehow managed to stay afloat on a single concept... though it seems to have a feircly loyal following based almost entirely on the compulsory behavior it fosters.
Modifié par Deflagratio, 13 septembre 2013 - 03:39 .
