Aller au contenu

Photo

Will the Templars attack mages in the Grey Wardens?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
226 réponses à ce sujet

#76
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Meh.
Wardens aren't that amazing.

Apparently, it says in the Calling that it took the entire Ferelden military to take down less than 100 Wardens.


and our pc take down all of them ferelden military isn't very competent especially that loghain was best strategist and in first game he made so many dumb decision.:lol:


Passing over the fact that Loghain wasn't in charge of them back then, you're also missing the more important fact that competence shouldn't matter in this. We are talking about the military of an entire country against about 100 people.

but seriously they aren't so powerful yes they are well-trained warriors but templars also and some of them have now super power sposored by red lyrium


I have never seen the Templars credited with anything like what the Wardens have been. Also, supposing that in this playthrough Avernus published that brew of his?


first i know that loghain wasn't in charge then but that was more joke about ferelden military , well yes competence is matter as well attitude our forces, and as i renember they lost.


well they took control in kirkwall and were most powerful force there.

#77
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

and our pc take down all of them ferelden military isn't very competent especially that loghain was best strategist and in first game he made so many dumb decision.:lol:


Passing over the fact that Loghain wasn't in charge of them back then, you're also missing the more important fact that competence shouldn't matter in this. We are talking about the military of an entire country against about 100 people.

but seriously they aren't so powerful yes they are well-trained warriors but templars also and some of them have now super power sposored by red lyrium


I have never seen the Templars credited with anything like what the Wardens have been. Also, supposing that in this playthrough Avernus published that brew of his?


first i know that loghain wasn't in charge then but that was more joke about ferelden military , well yes competence is matter as well attitude our forces, and as i renember they lost.


The Wardens were stupidly outnumbered. They should not have died as game as they did without using demons from the beginning.

well they took control in kirkwall and were most powerful force there.


There's no evidence they were stupidly outnumbered, though.

#78
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 911 messages

Former_Fiend wrote...

The Hierophant wrote...

If by 100 wardens you mean Sophia Dryden's rebellion didn't that consist of demon spamming and blood magic abuse?


It also consisted of having a supremely defensible position in Soldier's Peak.

But that's part of the point; the Wardens are more than supremely skilled warriors- compared to the Templars who'll just take anyone who can say a prayer and swing a sword, the Wardens only accept the best. But beyond that, the Wardens are willing to go to any length to achieve victory. Blood magic, demon spamming. Doesn't matter.

Red lyrium addled Meredith needed Hawke, Cullen and a platoon of Templars to put her down. Can you imagine the Wardens defeating a small army of these guys?

Modifié par The Hierophant, 14 septembre 2013 - 10:25 .


#79
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages
As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.

#80
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages
 This seems like another after war thought personally; The Templars and Therefore the Seekers controlling the Templars are meeting the former remenants of the Circle in battle.

Once that has ended we can see where they go from there; After the dust has settled the Seekers very well might continued to ignore the Wardens or engage them.

However Mages within the Wardens are a rarity to begin with according to the Wardens themselves and therefore i can see the Wardens solving this issue by merely turning over the Wardens if their political position aka their neutrality is threatened by not doing so.

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.

#81
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Meh.
Wardens aren't that amazing.

Apparently, it says in the Calling that it took the entire Ferelden military to take down less than 100 Wardens.


and our pc take down all of them ferelden military isn't very competent especially that loghain was best strategist and in first game he made so many dumb decision.:lol:


Passing over the fact that Loghain wasn't in charge of them back then, you're also missing the more important fact that competence shouldn't matter in this. We are talking about the military of an entire country against about 100 people.

but seriously they aren't so powerful yes they are well-trained warriors but templars also and some of them have now super power sposored by red lyrium


I have never seen the Templars credited with anything like what the Wardens have been. Also, supposing that in this playthrough Avernus published that brew of his?


first i know that loghain wasn't in charge then but that was more joke about ferelden military , well yes competence is matter as well attitude our forces, and as i renember they lost.


well they took control in kirkwall and were most powerful force there.

Them taking control of Kirkwall was coincidence of the rash actions of the former leaders of Kirkwall. Kirkwall was once ruled by a tyrant who attacked the templers out of paranoia. They only had power over Kirkwall because the chantry wanted them to.

#82
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

and our pc take down all of them ferelden military isn't very competent especially that loghain was best strategist and in first game he made so many dumb decision.:lol:


Passing over the fact that Loghain wasn't in charge of them back then, you're also missing the more important fact that competence shouldn't matter in this. We are talking about the military of an entire country against about 100 people.

but seriously they aren't so powerful yes they are well-trained warriors but templars also and some of them have now super power sposored by red lyrium


I have never seen the Templars credited with anything like what the Wardens have been. Also, supposing that in this playthrough Avernus published that brew of his?


first i know that loghain wasn't in charge then but that was more joke about ferelden military , well yes competence is matter as well attitude our forces, and as i renember they lost.


The Wardens were stupidly outnumbered. They should not have died as game as they did without using demons from the beginning.

well they took control in kirkwall and were most powerful force there.


There's no evidence they were stupidly outnumbered, though.


still they they couldn't handle that and they have fortresses they were forced to use demons because they losing and even with demons they failed.

Well templars took control in kikrkwall and were most powerful force there even it is stated in game.

leaguer of one wrote...

Them taking control of Kirkwall
was coincidence of the rash actions of the former leaders of Kirkwall.
Kirkwall was once ruled by a tyrant who attacked the templers out of
paranoia. They only had power over Kirkwall because the chantry wanted
them to.


Templars are chantry army so they were chantry force now they aren't because lambert say fu*** you to divine even if chantry would say no to them they still would have control. 

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 14 septembre 2013 - 10:28 .


#83
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.


Gray Warden Mage Spells can still be disrupted by Templar abilities. Also do not forget Templars and Seekers are by far some of the best warriors in Thedas i do believe you overestimate the Wardens ever so slightly.

Not to mention even on a regional level there are great many more Templars then there are Wardens.

#84
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

 This seems like another after war thought personally; The Templars and Therefore the Seekers controlling the Templars are meeting the former remenants of the Circle in battle.

Once that has ended we can see where they go from there; After the dust has settled the Seekers very well might continued to ignore the Wardens or engage them.

However Mages within the Wardens are a rarity to begin with according to the Wardens themselves and therefore i can see the Wardens solving this issue by merely turning over the Wardens if their political position aka their neutrality is threatened by not doing so.

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.

First of all, Mage are a need resorce with their attack and healing abilities, no way an armed force would ever give up people as valuible as mages.
Second, the templar no longer work or have athority of the chantry. They have nothing back anything they say because they are renagades. Even the seekers are not longer with the chantry but a few. And they don't have a country backing them.

If the templars try to attack the mages of the grey wardens, they will be demolished with no punishment going to the gray wardens.

#85
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...



leaguer of one wrote...

Them taking control of Kirkwall
was coincidence of the rash actions of the former leaders of Kirkwall.
Kirkwall was once ruled by a tyrant who attacked the templers out of
paranoia. They only had power over Kirkwall because the chantry wanted
them to.


Templars are chantry army so they were chantry force now they aren't because lambert say fu*** you to divine even if chantry would say no to them they still would have control. 

Which is why the templars holding kirkwall was not the will of the templars. It was a coincidence they held it and they kept the control because the divine told them to. And even then going by what Cassandra says in DA2, most of that chantry army is gone.

#86
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.


Mages are need for the Joining and to use against darkspawn incursions. It doesn't matter what the other option is, what you describe isn't one.

#87
Former_Fiend

Former_Fiend
  • Members
  • 6 942 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.


Mages are need for the Joining and to use against darkspawn incursions. It doesn't matter what the other option is, what you describe isn't one.


The Templars are no longer a branch of the Chantry- at least not wholely. As such, they don't have the authority to eject the Wardens from a nation by any means other than force.

Beyond which I don't see the Wardens as being above leave a nation to it's own devices if they don't want them there. They'd ideally prefer to have a pressence within every nation, but a nation that started giving them orders and ultimatums may well find themselves on the "Have fun facing the next blight on your own" list. 

#88
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

 This seems like another after war thought personally; The Templars and Therefore the Seekers controlling the Templars are meeting the former remenants of the Circle in battle.

Once that has ended we can see where they go from there; After the dust has settled the Seekers very well might continued to ignore the Wardens or engage them.

However Mages within the Wardens are a rarity to begin with according to the Wardens themselves and therefore i can see the Wardens solving this issue by merely turning over the Wardens if their political position aka their neutrality is threatened by not doing so.

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.

First of all, Mage are a need resorce with their attack and healing abilities, no way an armed force would ever give up people as valuible as mages.
Second, the templar no longer work or have athority of the chantry. They have nothing back anything they say because they are renagades. Even the seekers are not longer with the chantry but a few. And they don't have a country backing them.

If the templars try to attack the mages of the grey wardens, they will be demolished with no punishment going to the gray wardens.


Incorrect and biased assumption to boot.

One we do not know the state of the Chantry involvement with both factions to this moment we all know that Lambert disolved the accord that allowed the chantry to direct the Seekers and thus the Templars.

They very well could have positions of support coming from the chantry that share their view; After all the new Divine isn't exactly popular even among her own order so i think its a bit premature to judge the entire chantry to be unsupportive to the very faction they have been assisting and directing for only a thousand years.

Two.

The Templars are they stand now are a viable Nation in their own right, Not counting the Red Templars and Lamber's gathering of Knight Commanders and thus all the resources 13 chapters of templars will bring to the table you have thousands if not tens of thousands of warriors in this gathering.

You have enough to march upon any Gray Warden Stronghold in Thedas and win through sheer numeric might.

Thirdly again assumption The Templars had immense political power within Kirkwall and who is to say that this isn't the case elsewhere? Once the Chantry fragmented with the disolving of the Accord and the Mage Templar war you likely would see Nations that were once impartial to the chantry and thus the Templars having them used as a Martial Force because they already exist as an army.

So the Situation while far from clear or known as i see it the Templars hold the aces when  dealing with a much smaller, much more disaproved of group such as the Wardens.

Your basically comparing a relic that most Nations, Nobles and Scholars agree no longer has purpose except every few centuries and the balwark against Magic and the Common Man.

If Nations had to choose between the two?

The choice is pretty clear.

#89
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.


Gray Warden Mage Spells can still be disrupted by Templar abilities. Also do not forget Templars and Seekers are by far some of the best warriors in Thedas i do believe you overestimate the Wardens ever so slightly.

Not to mention even on a regional level there are great many more Templars then there are Wardens.



Templars are not ammonge the best warriors in Thedas. The Seekers are and they are in fewer number then the wardens. And the wardens are active fighters while Templars mostly active as guards. Wardens are way more seasoned the templars will ever be. Wardens are death machines ,ade to kill death machines. Atemplar is nothing to a warden. The only advantages templars have ageint warden are numbers abut even then Wardens are trained to deal with hordes of enemies. In wardens keep  in DAO we see that a few wardens can take on a whole army for months.
And even if Templars have the numbers, they are still divided into factions due to their war.

#90
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

still they they couldn't handle that and they have fortresses they were forced to use demons because they losing and even with demons they failed.


That is debatable. I agree that the coup was a failure, but the last living person on that battlefield was Avernus.

Well templars took control in kikrkwall and were most powerful force there even it is stated in game.


My main point is that they weren't stupidly outnumbered. Thus the Templars taking over Kirkwall isn't as impressive as the difficulty the 100 Wardens managed to pose an entire army. Now supposing there had been 200?

leaguer of one wrote...

Them taking control of Kirkwall
was coincidence of the rash actions of the former leaders of Kirkwall.
Kirkwall was once ruled by a tyrant who attacked the templers out of
paranoia. They only had power over Kirkwall because the chantry wanted
them to.


Templars are chantry army so they were chantry force now they aren't because lambert say fu*** you to divine even if chantry would say no to them they still would have control. 


Except that some of the Templars will refuse to desert, citing his actions as illegal due to the Divine saying no in the first place. Plus, they will lose their funding and their Orzammar contacts. There's a limit to how powerful the rebel templars can remain.

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 14 septembre 2013 - 10:40 .


#91
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...



leaguer of one wrote...

Them taking control of Kirkwall
was coincidence of the rash actions of the former leaders of Kirkwall.
Kirkwall was once ruled by a tyrant who attacked the templers out of
paranoia. They only had power over Kirkwall because the chantry wanted
them to.


Templars are chantry army so they were chantry force now they aren't because lambert say fu*** you to divine even if chantry would say no to them they still would have control. 

Which is why the templars holding kirkwall was not the will of the templars. It was a coincidence they held it and they kept the control because the divine told them to. And even then going by what Cassandra says in DA2, most of that chantry army is gone.


Sure but templars were in kikrkwall perfectly fine (well only in control) without chantry and chantry were only decoration as well elthina even without chantry they could rule there because they were most powerful military force there.Not divine told them only because meredith was in control should be viscount but still templar were most powerful force there so no one have a word.   

#92
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.


Mages are need for the Joining and to use against darkspawn incursions. It doesn't matter what the other option is, what you describe isn't one.


It really doesn't matter by that point though.

The Templars likely know the reply if it came to that.

I would bet on a Warden in one on one combat but when it comes to a few dozen against a hundred or a thousand?

I think Templar is smart money; As i said before though i doubt they would pick another fight with multiple fronts to contend with already.

#93
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.


Mages are need for the Joining and to use against darkspawn incursions. It doesn't matter what the other option is, what you describe isn't one.


It really doesn't matter by that point though.

The Templars likely know the reply if it came to that.

I would bet on a Warden in one on one combat but when it comes to a few dozen against a hundred or a thousand?

I think Templar is smart money; As i said before though i doubt they would pick another fight with multiple fronts to contend with already.


There could be hundreds of Wardens in any one country, from what Riordan said. The Ander Templars would almost certainly be outnumbered. And the Wardens are able to challenge numbers a good deal greater than their own. I think the Wardens have a better than even chance.

#94
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

Templars are not ammonge the best warriors in Thedas. The Seekers are and they are in fewer number then the wardens. And the wardens are active fighters while Templars mostly active as guards. Wardens are way more seasoned the templars will ever be. Wardens are death machines ,ade to kill death machines. Atemplar is nothing to a warden.



Sez who?

#95
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.


Gray Warden Mage Spells can still be disrupted by Templar abilities. Also do not forget Templars and Seekers are by far some of the best warriors in Thedas i do believe you overestimate the Wardens ever so slightly.

Not to mention even on a regional level there are great many more Templars then there are Wardens.



Templars are not ammonge the best warriors in Thedas. The Seekers are and they are in fewer number then the wardens. And the wardens are active fighters while Templars mostly active as guards. Wardens are way more seasoned the templars will ever be. Wardens are death machines ,ade to kill death machines. Atemplar is nothing to a warden. The only advantages templars have ageint warden are numbers abut even then Wardens are trained to deal with hordes of enemies. In wardens keep  in DAO we see that a few wardens can take on a whole army for months.
And even if Templars have the numbers, they are still divided into factions due to their war.


The Templars are mostly taken into the Order at Adolesence or Childhood eitherway you see them recieving Martial Training for Years if not longer, You have an average warrior by the end of that training and then once they take their vows you see them acting as Guardians at a circle or doing various Templar taskes such as engaging renegade mages or what have you.

All in all you have capable warriors within the Templars themselves, I will not get into the Seekers as their Numbers, abilities, training and pretty much everything else is pure speculation although if Lambert was any indicator their Expreince and abilities put them on par with Veteran Warriors seeing as how Lambert was able to quickly dispatch even a Templar knight captain in a handful of moments.

No in the Keep we saw them survive a siege for months thats just engaging an Army thats using a fortress as a defense against it which as you saw in the keep it self once the Fortress it self fell the battle was over quickly.

And divided? Perhaps we don't know the situation but it is confirmed at least by Lambert  that the majority of Knight Commanders have pledged alliegence to the Seekers and thus any division among them is relatively minor.

#96
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

 This seems like another after war thought personally; The Templars and Therefore the Seekers controlling the Templars are meeting the former remenants of the Circle in battle.

Once that has ended we can see where they go from there; After the dust has settled the Seekers very well might continued to ignore the Wardens or engage them.

However Mages within the Wardens are a rarity to begin with according to the Wardens themselves and therefore i can see the Wardens solving this issue by merely turning over the Wardens if their political position aka their neutrality is threatened by not doing so.

The Wardens do not want to be ejected from a Nation; I doubt they would be pleased with the Ultimatium of "Give us the Mages or get out" But i do believe their choice would be to remain and go with out mages.

First of all, Mage are a need resorce with their attack and healing abilities, no way an armed force would ever give up people as valuible as mages.
Second, the templar no longer work or have athority of the chantry. They have nothing back anything they say because they are renagades. Even the seekers are not longer with the chantry but a few. And they don't have a country backing them.

If the templars try to attack the mages of the grey wardens, they will be demolished with no punishment going to the gray wardens.


Incorrect and biased assumption to boot.

One we do not know the state of the Chantry involvement with both factions to this moment we all know that Lambert disolved the accord that allowed the chantry to direct the Seekers and thus the Templars.

They very well could have positions of support coming from the chantry that share their view; After all the new Divine isn't exactly popular even among her own order so i think its a bit premature to judge the entire chantry to be unsupportive to the very faction they have been assisting and directing for only a thousand years.

Two.

The Templars are they stand now are a viable Nation in their own right, Not counting the Red Templars and Lamber's gathering of Knight Commanders and thus all the resources 13 chapters of templars will bring to the table you have thousands if not tens of thousands of warriors in this gathering.

You have enough to march upon any Gray Warden Stronghold in Thedas and win through sheer numeric might.

Thirdly again assumption The Templars had immense political power within Kirkwall and who is to say that this isn't the case elsewhere? Once the Chantry fragmented with the disolving of the Accord and the Mage Templar war you likely would see Nations that were once impartial to the chantry and thus the Templars having them used as a Martial Force because they already exist as an army.

So the Situation while far from clear or known as i see it the Templars hold the aces when  dealing with a much smaller, much more disaproved of group such as the Wardens.

Your basically comparing a relic that most Nations, Nobles and Scholars agree no longer has purpose except every few centuries and the balwark against Magic and the Common Man.

If Nations had to choose between the two?

The choice is pretty clear.



"Incorrect and biased assumption to boot.

One we do not know the state of the Chantry involvement with both factions to this moment we all know that Lambert disolved the accord that allowed the chantry to direct the Seekers and thus the Templars.

They very well could have positions of support coming from the chantry that share their view; After all the new Divine isn't exactly popular even among her own order so i think its a bit premature to judge the entire chantry to be unsupportive to the very faction they have been assisting and directing for only a thousand years."

Wrong. We do. Cassandra in DA2 makes it clear. It' s a mess and survirly divided. DA:Asunders makes it even more clear that most of the templars are not with the chantry.

"The Templars are they stand now are a viable Nation in their own right, Not counting the Red Templars and Lamber's gathering of Knight Commanders and thus all the resources 13 chapters of templars will bring to the table you have thousands if not tens of thousands of warriors in this gathering."

Wrong again. As great as the templar are they are not at a might of a nation. These are groups made to guard circles and even then they have a huge risk a resource. They need lyrium and only the chantry were suppling them and finacing them. They can do long term war with out the chantry.

"You have enough to march upon any Gray Warden Stronghold in Thedas and win through sheer numeric might."

Play the dlc "Wardens keep" and say that agein. The wardens held back an army for months. And that was just 20 men.


"Thirdly again assumption The Templars had immense political power within Kirkwall and who is to say that this isn't the case elsewhere? Once the Chantry fragmented with the disolving of the Accord and the Mage Templar war you likely would see Nations that were once impartial to the chantry and thus the Templars having them used as a Martial Force because they already exist as an army."

They only had it because the chantry wanted them to have it. They only got it because the prievious ruler of kirkwall attacked them out of Parinoia anf the templars won out in the fight. That does not mean templars have political power. In normal cases the templars do not get involved in the matters of the state. The templars of kirkwall were only allow political control because the chantry wanted them to hold it.

No nation is going to side with the templars. They are not as great warriors as you think. They take up too much resource to mantain with their need of lyrium to even function. With out lyrium templar are out by a month. Mage on the other hand can take on armies with just a hand full an heal countless people. Mages were the only thing that stopped the qunari from over running thades.
Mages are 1000 times more valuble then Templars in a war and yet your saying nations will side with the templars who can't go a month with out expensive lyrium?

#97
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.


Gray Warden Mage Spells can still be disrupted by Templar abilities. Also do not forget Templars and Seekers are by far some of the best warriors in Thedas i do believe you overestimate the Wardens ever so slightly.

Not to mention even on a regional level there are great many more Templars then there are Wardens.



Templars are not ammonge the best warriors in Thedas. The Seekers are and they are in fewer number then the wardens. And the wardens are active fighters while Templars mostly active as guards. Wardens are way more seasoned the templars will ever be. Wardens are death machines ,ade to kill death machines. Atemplar is nothing to a warden. The only advantages templars have ageint warden are numbers abut even then Wardens are trained to deal with hordes of enemies. In wardens keep  in DAO we see that a few wardens can take on a whole army for months.
And even if Templars have the numbers, they are still divided into factions due to their war.


The Templars are mostly taken into the Order at Adolesence or Childhood eitherway you see them recieving Martial Training for Years if not longer, You have an average warrior by the end of that training and then once they take their vows you see them acting as Guardians at a circle or doing various Templar taskes such as engaging renegade mages or what have you.

All in all you have capable warriors within the Templars themselves, I will not get into the Seekers as their Numbers, abilities, training and pretty much everything else is pure speculation although if Lambert was any indicator their Expreince and abilities put them on par with Veteran Warriors seeing as how Lambert was able to quickly dispatch even a Templar knight captain in a handful of moments.

No in the Keep we saw them survive a siege for months thats just engaging an Army thats using a fortress as a defense against it which as you saw in the keep it self once the Fortress it self fell the battle was over quickly.

And divided? Perhaps we don't know the situation but it is confirmed at least by Lambert  that the majority of Knight Commanders have pledged alliegence to the Seekers and thus any division among them is relatively minor.





Not 100% true. Some are train form youth ,mosr come into the order later in life like the recuits seen in DA2.
And they are no where near as active as a warden is. Warden from the time they are in the order have countless experiances in battle. A templar on the other hand after training do not see much action at all. It does not matter when you are trained, experiance is what counts. Wardens are battle harden. Templars are not.

And Fortess seiging is a battle. It normally takes time to do so. The fact remain that if the templars attack a grey warden fortess, they will not win.

And we have a very clear statment by Cassandra that the templar order is divided and oar out side chantry control. It's not a maybe.

#98
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

As far as Templars trying to pick a fight against the non corrupted mage Grey wardens would most treat it as an act of war, and will probably retaliate.

Templars are use to dealing with Blood mages and Grey Wardens are use to dealing with darkspawn which includes one of the toughest ones,an Ogre. They use to dealing with tough combat. Templars would be too easy to beat.


Gray Warden Mage Spells can still be disrupted by Templar abilities. Also do not forget Templars and Seekers are by far some of the best warriors in Thedas i do believe you overestimate the Wardens ever so slightly.

Not to mention even on a regional level there are great many more Templars then there are Wardens.


The Templars abilitites may distrupt the Grey wardens mages but that doesn't permanately disenage a mage from recovering, and retailating back by using power spells to use against them. Templars actually fear mages... which is why they want to control them. An experienced mage is far more powerful than a unit of Templars.

Look at what happen at the circle tower. The Templars there could not even stop 1 Senior mage.

As far as Templars and Seekers being the best warriors in Thedas... They didn't seem to be able to end the blight. It was the Grey wardens that did.

#99
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Templars are not ammonge the best warriors in Thedas. The Seekers are and they are in fewer number then the wardens. And the wardens are active fighters while Templars mostly active as guards. Wardens are way more seasoned the templars will ever be. Wardens are death machines ,ade to kill death machines. Atemplar is nothing to a warden.



Sez who?

Says the grey wardens, qunari, dwarves, dragon hunters, and Chevaliers.

#100
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

leaguer of one wrote...
 Mage on the other hand can take on armies with just a hand full an heal countless people. Mages were the only thing that stopped the qunari from over running thades.
Mages are 1000 times more valuble then Templars in a war and yet your saying nations will side with the templars who can't go a month with out expensive lyrium?


nope mages are weak ignoring how much sometimes lore try convince to the contrary ,mages are kicked by everyone.Perhaps blood mages have more power and well abominations but mage is weak.Mages have massive disadvantage they are ticking time bomb and beside healing they can't offer much so mages advantages<<<<disadvantages .