Zu Long wrote...
EntropicAngel wrote...
Zu Long wrote...
So if you're not a "pure" African descendent, you're not actually black?
Not the same kind of black. The genetics are kind of hard to understand, but different races and genders have different affects on black features.
I have a white father and a black mother. However, my hair is still coarse, and I retain the high cheekbones.
A few of my cousins, however, have black fathers and white mothers. Interestingly enough, their hair is smooth.
So I have trouble calling someone black when their physical characteristics aren't that of a "real" black person.
Indeed? Do your cousins not conisder themselves "real" black people? I have a cousin who has straight hair, yet considers herself to be a black person, because her skin pigmentation is quite dark. I have the feeling that if someone said she wasn't "really" black due to her hair, she would become rather cross and feel she had been insulted. I tend to leave race identification to the person in question, myself.
Indeed, yes. Race (leaving aside that it's a social construct and not a biological one at all) is determined as much by culture as anything else, I'd wager. At least in the United States, I've known a few biracial people whose physical features were such that they could have "passed" for white or even, sometimes, Latino, but, quite beyond their Black ancestry, they were raised by Black families, in Black neighborhoods, and identified as Black.
Who gets the final say in how an individual identifies? We've already seen the crap that happens when the state gets involved in classifying people.
Modifié par Silfren, 16 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .