Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...
I don't think mages come from every walk of life. In fact, I'm only aware of four categories. Mage living a highly regimented and controlled life in the Circle, Apostate on the run/living in seclusion, Dalish keeper, and Tevinter magister/apprentice.
A mage can be born anywhere to nearly anyone. As far as we know, Feynriel had two non-magical parents.
Every. Walk. Of. Life.
Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...
Certainly mages have been presented as having more divergent opinions while templars are at least *supposed* to be more uniform becuase of their station and their vows. However, we have seen that they aren't in fact uniform and they have become even less so now that the order is fracturing.
I never claimed that templars had uniform opinions, merely that they are closely associated with each other while mages in general are politically scattered.
Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...
I want a more indepth look into the divergence in templar opinion despite the vows, the fracturing of the order, etc. etc. I think a companion is one of the best ways to provide that. I don't really see how them being part of an organization somehow means all aspects of storytelling related to the templar order has to be relagated to NPCs.
What I meant is that we HAVE experienced several different templar perspectives, just not through companions.
The fact that templars owe (or owed) their allegience to a specific religious-political entity meant that it was unlikely for one to be a companion.
And now that the original Templar Order is essentially no more, I think any person with anti-magic abilities could fill a similar role as a templar.
Modifié par MasterScribe, 20 septembre 2013 - 11:58 .