Gwydden wrote...
dragonflight288 wrote...
Gwydden wrote...
dragonflight288 wrote...
Reasonable people don't go into a legl meeting and say 'break it up, you're all under arrest, and if you disagree with me, my associates will kill you.'
I clarified that he was reasonable when compared to other templars we've met (Meredith, Alrik, Cullen a bit), while at the same time not being as incompetent as others (Thrask, Cullen again).
Reasonable compared to others means exactly what, in the end? That's like saying he's reasonable compared to a mad serial killer, or reasonable compared to someone who has lost all sense of reason or logic. Or reasonable compared to someone who is traumatized.
That's hardly comforting from the person in charge of making sure templars don't abuse mages.
What I expect from a reasonable, well-rounded templar or seeker, is someone who takes every aspect of the job seriously. Including the parts that they protect mages from others. Not just protect others from mages.
My point is that if you actually wanted a templar that will protect you from mages, he wouldn't be that terrible a choice. As I said, the only "good" templar we've actually met in the games, as far as I can remember, is Gregoir.
But that's the thing. He wasn't a templar. It wasn't his job to protect people from mages. He was a Seeker, the Lord-High Seeker to be precise. His job was to investigate the templars and keep them from abusing the mages, or to remove ineffectual templars and get them replaced.
He was not doing his designated job, since his paranoia had him acting as a Knight-Vigilant templar.
It's especially damning when he orders Evangeline to kill anyone who may have proof that tranquility is curable.





Retour en haut





