I don't agree, Allan. If we're talking about a rating classification then most of what is considered 'mature' comes down to the balance of what's explorative and what's exploitative.
I wasn't talking about a rating classification anymore, but just what it means for content to be "mature." A lot of forms of entertainment are rated mature not because the content contained within is considered mature. A lot of movies that I feel have mature content are not rated R/M.
That's also why The Shawshank Redemption is less of a 'mature' movie than Pulp Fiction (a movie I also like).
Maybe whether or not content is mature is in fact a personal thing, then?
I consider Pulp Fiction to be a form of escapist entertainment (barring maybe the Tarantino soliloquy) . I consider Shawshank Redemption to be an example of interpretive storytelling. Both are high quality, entertaining movies, however.
Note that I am referring to the entirety of the movie. I picked those two simply because both depict scenes of male rape.
If you wanted to take video games, there's pretty much nothing that I would consider to be a more mature narrative (in large part because of the sheer quality of its writing) than Planescape: Torment.
But then, we'd have to try to define what the term "mature" means. And as you alluded to, it may be somewhat personal.





Retour en haut







