Aller au contenu

Photo

So it was the events in Asunder that set off the Mage-Templar War.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1256 réponses à ce sujet

#926
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

cjones91 wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
And finally, yourargument is redicolous.
Yes, human do bad things. But humans aren't nearly as dangerous as mages, can be easily controlled, and finally - you can't throw humanity in prison. How would you do that? I'm asking from a practical perspective - who would be the one throwing humanity in jail? Who would produce food? Who would be the jailor? Who would pay for those jails? And how could a billion poeple throw themsleves into jail?


Yet you do the same to mages....honestly non mages who advocate throwing mages in prison simply for what they might do need to set a example and let themselves be locked up because of something they may never do in the future.



Missing the point.
The argument for locking mages isn't one of morality or character...but one of abiltiy and danger.

No mundane will ever be as big as danger as a mage.You know what? Find me ONE - just one - example of a single mundane child cuaisng the death of hunderds despite not wanting it-  like Connor...and I'll capitulate.


I am waiting....

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 28 septembre 2013 - 04:23 .


#927
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
It's not. And it hasn't been for 700 years. Any claims are pointless and that noble would have no claim either.

Unless you want to argue that if a man whgo's foun out to be a blood relative of a roman emperor has the claim to the whole europe and would justified in his campaign of ethnic clensing and genocied to "reclaim" it?
I wonder what your stance on Israel is then? Who's land is that?


If that land was the place where generations of their family was born and they were kicked out for unjust reasons?Then yes that man would have a strong claim.Besides it's not ethnic cleasing to kick someone out of your home after they illegally kicked you out.I strongly suggest looking up the definition of ethnic cleansing because it's being used as a buzzword for arguments of why the Dales should remain in Orlesian hands after they had pillaged it.


And guess what many MORE generations of humans were born on that land and lived there.
They know that land better than any Dalish does.
The Dalish haven't lived there for 700 years.

Yes, it is ethnic clensing, no matter how you try to pretty it up. It's not their home anymore. It ceased to be hunderds of years ago.


From your answer, I can only gleam that you suport the destruction of Israel then, since all the tribes living there were forcibly evicted.


Lol,humans are monsters by their very nature.We may not be able to
summon demons, control minds, or anything else mages can do
but we can
and will try our hardest to commit the most horrific acts on each other.


And that is a VERY important difference. One that you continue to ignore.



I'm not ignoring anything,non mages aren't somehow above doing terrible things that you accuse mages of doing.And I prefer to not talk about regional politics of israel since I don't really have a opinion one way or another.

#928
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages
[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Most humans don't accept elves as anything but servants and second class citizens; Andrastians belittle non-Andrastians as heathens. The Inquisitor is the wild card here that I think could be an important factor, given the unique role in closing the tears and establishing ties across the war torn continent that is now being ravaged by demons and other horrors from the Fade.

Refusing to capitulate to the Chantry of Andraste or the Orlesian Empire doesn't make the elves self-absorbed.
[/quote]

That's not what I was talking about. The Dales xenophobic isolationism is part of the reason that relations soured with the humans. The Dales intentionally refused to cultivate any relationships with it's neighbours. They also sat back and allowed countless innocents be murdered by darkspawn instead of saving them while they could. Later they went as far to try to destroy a human captial at the height of their successes during the war with Orlais apparently without understanding the reaction it would bring. [/quote]

The neighbor of the Dales was Orlais, an empire that was being created through conquest and expansion into it's neighboring territories. Kirkwall, Nevarra, Ferelden - all these nations were eventually conquered by Orlais at one point or another; in fact, Orlais "helped" Nevarra during the Third Blight, and then conquered them right afterwards. I'm not sure why you think the Dales engaging Orlais in trade would have made any difference when it has never stopped them from conquering other nations in it's long history.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

All of these actions were short sighted and served only to galvanize hatred from the humans they were surrounded by, which in turn ultimately proved to be their downfall. Even Hahren Sarel seems to imply even in the Dalish version the elves realized they didn't anticipate the humans' actions correctly when he sarcastically laments how "they didn't expect the humans to revoke their prophet's gift so quickly." [/quote]

Well, when templars invade the sovereign kingdom of the elves in an attempt to forcibly convert them and conquer them after they kick out their missionaries, in a nation that was rewarded to the elven people by Andraste's sons for their participation in the war against the Imperium, I'd feel the same way as Hahren Sarel.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

And while we have much less information on the Fall of Arlathan, elven history again tells us that the elves closed themselves off from humanity and tried to isolate themselves from what they perceived as vermin. [/quote]

From Orlais, you mean. Let's not pretend the elves rebuked all of humanity simply because they refused to open relations with the fanatical empire that wanted to conquer and convert them.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Siding with the elves could be a possibility. I certainly find it more interesting than siding with Celene or Gaspard.
[/quote]

Yeah and my point is that just because you find it interesting doesn't mean you can. For all we know an elf revolt will be too weak to be of any practical use to the Inquisiton and would need the support of Celene or Gaspard to survive, if it can at all. Dividing up the most powerful nation in Thedas into 2 or 3 or more weaker warring states is hardly productive in combating the army of demons pouring through the hole in the sky. [/quote]

It doesn't mean the protagonist can't, either. You might prefer playing as a protagonist who favors Orlais and the Chantry, but I'd rather play as a proactive protagonist who helps free his people. I think liberating the Dales from the Orlesian Empire so that elves can finally have a homeland of their own - after so many centuries of living under the subjugation of human tyranny - is worth the effort. I could care less about Celene or Gaspard's little war over the throne.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Humans are never going to he happy with an elven kingdom where the Maker isn't a mandatory religion for the people, and where elves would have real power. I don't see any reason for the racist views of the Andrastians to dictate the future of the elves. I'd rather try to carve out a real future for the elves, even if it upsets some humans. Enough is enough. I don't think an independent Dales would doom the elves, especially if they had the support of the new Inquisition. [/quote]

Well the Chantry managed to never invade the Kingdom of Rivain with an Exalted March because Andrastians are the minoirty in all the centuries it existed. If the elves try antaognize the humans to take what they want they will lose it. Because humans are more powerful than the elves and their nations rule the entire continent. If the humans become upset by something like the suffering of countless refugees driven from their homes by vengeful rebel elves, they will attack any fragile new elven nation. The elves only hope is to make sure the humans don't hate them enough to rise up and destroy them again. [/quote]

There are a sufficient amount of Andrastians in Rivain that they tried to expel the Qunari converts, and ended up killing plenty of Rivain people who followed the Qun. Countless people were murdered: "And again, when the Rivain Chantry and nationalist forces, unable to convert its people back to the worship of the Maker, tried a purge by the sword, slaughtering countless unarmed people and burying them in mass graves."

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

I'm not sure why they would be surprised that the elves didn't aid an expansionist empire that was forcibly converting people to their religion Look at it from the point of view of the Emerald Knights: why help an enemy that wants to conquer you and destroy you? I'm sure the templar incursion didn't help matters, if the Dalish historical account is accurate. [/quote]

Because Orlais wasn't their enemy during the Second Blight. They would be foolish or selfish to think otherwise. Drakon never tried to expand into the Dales anyway. Orlais did not want to destroy the elves until much later. I also seriously doubt Drakon had to do much forcible conversion anyway, the tribes he united in his earlier days were all in the Orlesian heartlands where Andraste's message had already taken root. [/quote]

There were different Cults of the Maker; Kordillus Drakon simply nationalized his and imposed it on the people as the one, true religion. "There were many converts, including powerful people in the Imperium and in the city-states of what is now Orlais. Such was the power of the Maker's word that the young King Drakon undertook a series of Exalted Marches meant to unite the city-states and create an empire solely dedicated to the Maker's will. The Orlesian Empire became the seat of the Chantry's power, the Grand Cathedral in Val Royeaux the source of the movement that birthed the organized Chantry as we know it today."

Also, the Orlesian Empire had issues with the Dales since Drakon's reign as the first Emperor, since it prevented him from conquering the Free Marches.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Mass murder, violence, rape. Being limited to impoverished slums and roles of servitude. Andrastians seeing elves as less than people. Things are bad enough for the elves as it is in the Andrastian kingdoms. That's sufficient enough for me to oppose the status quo and endorse an independent elven kingdom.
[/quote]

And it could still be worse. Much worse. And it likely would be made worse by going to war with humanity. City Elves lives are hard, but they still go through them with hope and a certain amount of freedom. That wasn't always the case. Alternatively they could simply be destroyed if they  fight and fail and thus be driven to the literal edge of extinction. [/quote]

It's been worse for centuries for the elves; you might be content with the status quo, but I'm not interested in doing nothing if the opportunity arises for an elven Inquisitor to help his people.

[quote]Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Because the elves aren't alone this time. I think having a powerful organization that is setting up alliances in various parts of Thedas could factor into a change in history this time around.[/quote]

Well, I suppose we can't know for sure until the game comes out but I think you're vastly overestimating the importance of the Inquisiton and the player character. The Inquisition is also a powerful organization in a human world. It's power comes from humans. It exists at the sufferance of humanity. Most of it's personel are going to be humans. And whoever the Inquisitor is will change over time (unless of course the Inquisiton disbands after the game). The first Inquisition existed for a 120 years before it was abosrbed into the Chantry. [/quote]

Based on what the developers have said, the Inquisition is an organization that can become quite powerful, so I see no reason why an elven Inquisition would have to capitulate to human rulers if the Inquisitior is the one who can stop the threat from the veil tears. And I don't see a new Inquisiton created by a follower of the Creators being absorded into the Chantry of Andraste.

#929
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
I'm pretty sure you can't cite the future when you're trying to make an argument about the past. The Dalish/Orlais thing happened after the Second Blight but before the Third, if I recall correctly.

Aside from that, continue with your rather misguided fantasy on what happened.

#930
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 286 messages

cjones91 wrote...

I'm not ignoring anything,non mages aren't somehow above doing terrible things that you accuse mages of doing.And I prefer to not talk about regional politics of israel since I don't really have a opinion one way or another.


smiling at you from heavens...

Posted Image

#931
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages
[quote]cjones91 wrote...

[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...

[quote]cjones91 wrote...

Lol,humans are monsters by their very nature.We may not be able to
summon demons, control minds, or anything else mages can do
but we can
and will try our hardest to commit the most horrific acts on each other.
[/quote]

And that is a VERY important difference. One that you continue to ignore.



[/quote]
I'm not ignoring anything,non mages aren't somehow above doing terrible things that you accuse mages of doing.And I prefer to not talk about regional politics of israel since I don't really have a opinion one way or another.[/quote]

Yes you are. You are ignoring it. right no.
Because you keep repeating like a broken record "mundanes can be bad too", whihc directly proves you are ignoring it(or missing the point)

And you made a very clear stance before. I quote:

[img]If that land was the place where generations of their family was born
and they were kicked out for unjust reasons?Then yes that man would have
a strong claim.Besides it's not ethnic cleasing to kick someone out of
your home after they illegally kicked you out.[/quote]

YOUR words.
So following YOUR words, the palestinians have EVERY justification and right to destroy Israel - unless you only want to apply your definite critera selectively.

#932
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

And while we have much less information on the Fall of Arlathan, elven history again tells us that the elves closed themselves off from humanity and tried to isolate themselves from what they perceived as vermin.



From Orlais, you mean. Let's not pretend the elves rebuked all of humanity simply because they refused to open relations with the fanatical empire that wanted to conquer and convert them.


I don't think Orlias was around at the time or Arlathan.

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 28 septembre 2013 - 07:39 .


#933
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

MisterJB wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Relocation doesn't demand the death of innocent people, and the primary focus is on giving the elves land where they would be safe from purges and being hunted down for being heretics who have free mages among them. I think the elves reclaiming the Dales from the Orlesian Empire is preferable to the status quo.


...you're giving me an headache.

Ok, last attempt. Please, at least make an effort to accompany me rather than reverting back to your automated response of "Elves have it bad".


Look, I sincerely understand that you disagree with me strongly about this issue, but I honestly doubt that you and I are going to reach a consensus here.

MisterJB wrote...

Forced relocations of large groups of people always leads to the death of innocents. Elves are just as fallible as humans and if they suddenly find themselves with the power to force the humans in the Dales to leave, we're looking at murder, pillage, rape, torture, etc. And this will be branded as "justice" and "revenge for years of opression" regardless if the humans on the suffering end every commited any act of opression.


I respectfully disagree, because relocation doesn't always lead to the death of innocent people. I think, in this case, the protagonist could do his best to make certain that civilians aren't killed or harmed. In this hypothetical scenario, with the Inquisitior leading a potentially powerful organization that could be comprised of humans (and potentially elves), I think that an independent Dales could relocate Andrastian humans who simply wouldn't accept elven rule over an independent nation of the Dales, or the concept of a nation where elves can follow a religion other than the Chantry of Andraste.

MisterJB wrote...

Yes, theoretically, making one person move from a place to the other doesn't imply death but, in practice, it's where it always ends.


I think the existance of the Inquisition could mean that relocation wouldn't necessarily lead to death like the Long Walk did for the elves who gained a boon from Shartan's struggle against the Imperium.

MisterJB wrote...

This is not; and I'm going to repeat it; this is NOT up for debate. Take a look through the history of the world. Whenever large groups of people were forced by the victors of a conflict to move somewhere else, terrible things happened. If Orlais is defeated and large groups of its population are forced to move elsewhere, terrible things will happen to them regardless if they are purging Alienages or simply going about their daily life without hurting a single innocent elf.


I concede that bad things could happen with relocation. However, with the status quo, I know that bad things will continue to transpire to the elven people across the continent. Bad things will continue to happen to the elves, unless they have a place where they are safe from the humans who lord over them. I suppose it's a matter of making a choice that leads to less suffering, since centuries have done nothing to change the status quo for the Alienage elves or the Dalish clans.

MisterJB wrote...

Plus, what exactly gives the elves the right to take away the homes of innocent people. Yes, Orlais did something terrible in uprooting elven settlements that might have stood there for 300 years but the human settlements in the Dales have existed for 700 years now. That's more than the double of the number of years the Dalish ever lived there.


Because relocated humans aren't likely to be harmed or killed by other humans for being 'heathens', or suffer the way that Alienage elves have with purges or mistreatment due to their status as second class citizens who most humans see as less than people. An independent Dales can provide safety and security against these abuses, so I think the step should be taken.

MisterJB wrote...

Those people have worked and lived in that land for generations. What gives the elves the right to just take it from them?


The fact that an independent Dales could be the only safe place in the whole of Thedas for the elven people.

MisterJB wrote...

I'm honestly trying to work with you here. Yes, I acknowledge that the City Elves lead terrible lives that they don't deserve right now; you are right in saying that things should change. But let's forget about the elves for a second and acknowledge that the results of what you propose would be ghastly for innocent humans.


The problem is that I don't think things will change, and I'm addressing this in line with a possible elven rebellion that may be trying to overthrow Orlesian rule over the Dales. In this scenario, I would have an elven Inquisitor aid the elves. If there are other options to provide elves with a safe haven away from human settlements somewhere else, then I would certainly embrace that option, although I think the elves would have attempted to settle such an area centuries ago. If the Dales is the only option, then I'll help the elves.

MisterJB wrote...

Do you simply consider that to be morally justifiable because it might; and I empashyze the MIGHT; lead to elves leading better lives? If a family refuses to leave because their ancestors lived there for 700 years and they never did anything to any elf and the elves torture, rape and murder that entire family, will that be justified? 


Are you saying that the betterment of the entire elven race isn't worth the possible death of one human family? Bad things are going to happen to the Alienage elves and the Dalish clans as long as they continue to exist within the sphere of human civilizations that care nothing for them, while an independent Dales could potentially change that for the entire elven race.

#934
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages
I'm honestly shocked how many hoops a person is willing to jump through to, on the one hand, just outright justify ethnic cleansing and, on the other, not actually call it ethnic cleansing.

The saddest part about all of this is the inability for people to understand how all of this debate applies perfectly to the mage-templar war, and how the ROA and the Circles are wrong for the same reason ethnic cleansing in Orlais is wrong.

#935
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

And while we have much less information on the Fall of Arlathan, elven history again tells us that the elves closed themselves off from humanity and tried to isolate themselves from what they perceived as vermin.  


From Orlais, you mean. Let's not pretend the elves rebuked all of humanity simply because they refused to open relations with the fanatical empire that wanted to conquer and convert them.


I don't think Orlias was around at the time or Arlathan.


I focused on the 'again' part of Jedi's sentence to mean she was addressing that the elves were closing themselves off again from a tyrannical empire, since Tevinter responded by destroying Arlathan and enslaving the elven people. Interesingly, the conditions that the elves live in Orlesian society can be seen as 'slavery' by an elven Warden, and the living conditions of the elves in the Alienage in Orlais is said to be atrocious.

#936
AlexanderCousland

AlexanderCousland
  • Members
  • 919 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Ohh?
Can other humans become possesed and bring forth demons, raise undead and take control of your mind - even when they don't want it and have the best of intentions?
No?

Then you have no argument.
Regular humans/elves/etc simply don't represent a significant enough threat to warrant different measures.


oh please stop using your argument demons that or that demons are danger for you for mage doesn't have to be for other tevinter is capable handle them (as well before circle) humans can have mental disorders , be selfish or ruthless as we see humanity created a lot suffering.

And your argument control mind or hurt me is pathetic because humans did bad things as well rape , murder ,genocide and only few dick*** of humanity i don't see you screaming throw humanity into prison we can do bad things.


Demons being the main danger trough mages doesn't make mages any less dangerous. I dont' care if hte mage wants it or not - that is utterly irrelevant. As I said before, GOOD, WELL-INTENTIONED mages can kill off an entire village with ease.

Also, all those dangerous mental disorders - people who have them are either locked up inmental institutions, or on so many meds they are basicly tranquil...so no points for you there either.
And no, you can't compare mages to any minority or group in the real world.

And finally, yourargument is redicolous.
Yes, human do bad things. But humans aren't nearly as dangerous as mages, can be easily controlled, and finally - you can't throw humanity in prison. How would you do that? I'm asking from a practical perspective - who would be the one throwing humanity in jail? Who would produce food? Who would be the jailor? Who would pay for those jails? And how could a billion poeple throw themsleves into jail?


Lotion is clearly a Templar, yep. He's definitely a member of the order. Lol

#937
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
Look, I sincerely understand that you disagree with me strongly about this issue, but I honestly doubt that you and I are going to reach a consensus here.

I'm not trying to reach a consensus.

I respectfully disagree, because relocation doesn't always lead to the death of innocent people. I think, in this case, the protagonist could do his best to make certain that civilians aren't killed or harmed. In this hypothetical scenario, with the Inquisitior leading a potentially powerful organization that could be comprised of humans (and potentially elves), I think that an independent Dales could relocate Andrastian humans who simply wouldn't accept elven rule over an independent nation of the Dales, or the concept of a nation where elves can follow a religion other than the Chantry of Andraste.

I think the existance of the Inquisition could mean that relocation wouldn't necessarily lead to death like the Long Walk did for the elves who gained a boon from Shartan's struggle against the Imperium.

Is the Inquisitor going to be able to personally and flawlessly supervise every single procedure ever undertaken by the Inquisition? No, that is impossible for anyone and, therefore, many under his/her command will abuse their power.
Is the Inquisitor going to be able to personally and flawlessly stand guard over every single human being forced by the elves to leave their homes? No, that is impossible for anyone which means many elves will predate upon these humans.
Will the Inquisitor's good intentions prevent any soldiers under his/her command from commiting crimes? No, regardless of how well intentioned or charismatic a leader was, soldiers during wars always took liberties with the defeated populations.
Will the Inquisitor prevent the humans from the Dales from having everything they have ever loved and known be stolen from them? No, s/he will be doing exactly that.

There is absolutely no way possible that a forced relocation of the human population of the Dales will not result in attrocities being commited regardless of how much power the Inquisiton holds, how involved or well intentioned they are.

Accept that by helping the elves, you are doing to innocent humans exactly the same Orlais did 700 years ago and you so despise.


I concede that bad things could happen with relocation. However, with the status quo, I know that bad things will continue to transpire to the elven people across the continent. Bad things will continue to happen to the elves, unless they have a place where they are safe from the humans who lord over them. I suppose it's a matter of making a choice that leads to less suffering, since centuries have done nothing to change the status quo for the Alienage elves or the Dalish clans.

There is no "could". Bad things will happen. What you are doing is causing the suffering of innocent people in order to support the group you prefer.
You're not alone in doing that, of course, but there is no "less suffering" here.

Because relocated humans aren't likely to be harmed or killed by other humans for being 'heathens', or suffer the way that Alienage elves have with purges or mistreatment due to their status as second class citizens who most humans see as less than people. An independent Dales can provide safety and security against these abuses, so I think the step should be taken.

But they'll be harmed and killed by elves for being humans.

The fact that an independent Dales could be the only safe place in the whole of Thedas for the elven people.

But those people have done nothing to the elves, they are innocent. Why is their suffering less important than that of the elves?

The problem is that I don't think things will change, and I'm addressing this in line with a possible elven rebellion that may be trying to overthrow Orlesian rule over the Dales. In this scenario, I would have an elven Inquisitor aid the elves. If there are other options to provide elves with a safe haven away from human settlements somewhere else, then I would certainly embrace that option, although I think the elves would have attempted to settle such an area centuries ago. If the Dales is the only option, then I'll help the elves.

Your willingness to consider other options does you credit.
How about trying to make it work withing human communities? And I'm not talking about the random elven hero that might appear once every thousand years.

Are you saying that the betterment of the entire elven race isn't worth the possible death of one human family? Bad things are going to happen to the Alienage elves and the Dalish clans as long as they continue to exist within the sphere of human civilizations that care nothing for them, while an independent Dales could potentially change that for the entire elven race.

It's not one family, it's thousands.
Should thousands of human families just die for the betterment of the elven race?

I understand that the elves have it bad and that you believe this is the only way to improve their lot. But you need to understand that what you are suggesting is that killing thousands of innocents and taking everything away from those who survive is acceptable in the pursuit of that goal which is quite appaling.

Modifié par MisterJB, 28 septembre 2013 - 06:11 .


#938
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages
[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Look, I sincerely understand that you disagree with me strongly about this issue, but I honestly doubt that you and I are going to reach a consensus here.[/quote]

I'm not trying to reach a consensus. [/quote]

Fair enough.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

I respectfully disagree, because relocation doesn't always lead to the death of innocent people. I think, in this case, the protagonist could do his best to make certain that civilians aren't killed or harmed. In this hypothetical scenario, with the Inquisitior leading a potentially powerful organization that could be comprised of humans (and potentially elves), I think that an independent Dales could relocate Andrastian humans who simply wouldn't accept elven rule over an independent nation of the Dales, or the concept of a nation where elves can follow a religion other than the Chantry of Andraste.

I think the existance of the Inquisition could mean that relocation wouldn't necessarily lead to death like the Long Walk did for the elves who gained a boon from Shartan's struggle against the Imperium.[/quote]

Is the Inquisitor going to be able to personally and flawlessly supervise every single procedure ever undertaken by the Inquisition? No, that is impossible for anyone and, therefore, many under his/her command will abuse their power. [/quote]

Flawlessly? No, I don't think it would be flawless. However, I think an Inquisition comprised of humans (and possibly elves) could minimalize any potential casualities, and prevent the kind of hardships that the elves originally faced in the Long Walk.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

Is the Inquisitor going to be able to personally and flawlessly stand guard over every single human being forced by the elves to leave their homes? No, that is impossible for anyone which means many elves will predate upon these humans. [/quote]

I think the Inquisition could help prevent these kind of abuses from taking place. I'm not talking about perfection, but I think it can play a significant role in keeping the peace between relocated humans, and the exodus of elves coming to a new homeland.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

Will the Inquisitor's good intentions prevent any soldiers under his/her command from commiting crimes? No, regardless of how well intentioned or charismatic a leader was, soldiers during wars always took liberties with the defeated populations.
Will the Inquisitor prevent the humans from the Dales from having everything they have ever loved and known be stolen from them? No, s/he will be doing exactly that. [/quote]

The alternative is letting the elves in the Alienages and the clans rot in misery for another 700 years while abuses continue to transpire against them because of how Andrastian humans perceive them and treat them. If I can give the elves a land to call their own, then I think it's a risk worth taking to irrevocably change the lives of the elves for the better.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

There is absolutely no way possible that a forced relocation of the human population of the Dales will not result in attrocities being commited regardless of how much power the Inquisiton holds, how involved or well intentioned they are.

Accept that by helping the elves, you are doing to innocent humans exactly the same Orlais did 700 years ago and you so despise. [/quote]

I acknowledge that bad things can happen, but I also accept that an independent Dales can potentially stop the plight that the elves have faced for the last 700 years.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

I concede that bad things could happen with relocation. However, with the status quo, I know that bad things will continue to transpire to the elven people across the continent. Bad things will continue to happen to the elves, unless they have a place where they are safe from the humans who lord over them. I suppose it's a matter of making a choice that leads to less suffering, since centuries have done nothing to change the status quo for the Alienage elves or the Dalish clans.[/quote]

There is no "could". Bad things will happen. What you are doing is causing the suffering of innocent people in order to support the group you prefer.
You're not alone in doing that, of course, but there is no "less suffering" here. [/quote]

Relocated humans aren't going to deal with Andrastians and Chantry members threatening their lives like the Dalish elves face for being 'heathens', nor will templars hunt them down for being free mages living among the non-mage elves with them. Relocated humans aren't going to be killed in purges while the Alienage elves are under human rule. Had Vaughan abducted human women in broad daylight instead of elven women, there would have been more of an outcry over his actions, rather than people simply not giving a damn. Had Kelder been a killer of human children instead of elven children, people in Kirkwall wouldn't have turned a blind eye towards his actions for so long, even with his father being the Magistrate. I can safely say there would be less suffering if the elves have an independent Dales to call home.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Because relocated humans aren't likely to be harmed or killed by other humans for being 'heathens', or suffer the way that Alienage elves have with purges or mistreatment due to their status as second class citizens who most humans see as less than people. An independent Dales can provide safety and security against these abuses, so I think the step should be taken.[/quote]

But they'll be harmed and killed by elves for being humans. [/quote]

Not if the new Inquisition is participating in helping most of the humans get safely into human lands.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

The fact that an independent Dales could be the only safe place in the whole of Thedas for the elven people.[/quote]

But those people have done nothing to the elves, they are innocent. Why is their suffering less important than that of the elves? [/quote]

Because in 700 years, those humans and their descendants aren't going to endure the kind of hardships, suffering, and potential mass executions of men, women, and children in purges that the elves will continue to suffer if they don't have a safe haven from human rule.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

The problem is that I don't think things will change, and I'm addressing this in line with a possible elven rebellion that may be trying to overthrow Orlesian rule over the Dales. In this scenario, I would have an elven Inquisitor aid the elves. If there are other options to provide elves with a safe haven away from human settlements somewhere else, then I would certainly embrace that option, although I think the elves would have attempted to settle such an area centuries ago. If the Dales is the only option, then I'll help the elves.[/quote]

Your willingness to consider other options does you credit.
How about trying to make it work withing human communities? And I'm not talking about the random elven hero that might appear once every thousand years. [/quote]

As Duncan said, it's difficult to dissuade people from seeing elves as less than people when it's how they've grown up their entire lives. I sincerely doubt that Andrastian humans would ever accept elves as equals, or the People who follow the Creators, particularly given how such people are basically condemned as heathens. A homeland can potentially help all the elves, while an attempt to change human opinion in one community isn't going to mean much for elves across the continent.

[quote]MisterJB wrote...

[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

Are you saying that the betterment of the entire elven race isn't worth the possible death of one human family? Bad things are going to happen to the Alienage elves and the Dalish clans as long as they continue to exist within the sphere of human civilizations that care nothing for them, while an independent Dales could potentially change that for the entire elven race. [/quote]

It's not one family, it's thousands.
Should thousands of human families just die for the betterment of the elven race?

I understand that the elves have it bad and that you believe this is the only way to improve their lot. But you need to understand that what you are suggesting is that killing thousands of innocents and taking everything away from those who survive is acceptable in the pursuit of that goal which is quite appaling. [/quote]

I don't think thousands of Andrastian humans need to die, which is my point. I understand that bad things can happen, but I think the Inquisition can help safeguard many humans into the human kingdoms. I'm not looking for civilians to die, I'm simply looking to give the elves a homeland.

#939
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

In Exile wrote...

I'm honestly shocked how many hoops a person is willing to jump through to, on the one hand, just outright justify ethnic cleansing and, on the other, not actually call it ethnic cleansing.

The saddest part about all of this is the inability for people to understand how all of this debate applies perfectly to the mage-templar war, and how the ROA and the Circles are wrong for the same reason ethnic cleansing in Orlais is wrong.


I'm surprised you're still capable of being shocked by something like this. :?

#940
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Ohh?
Can other humans become possesed and bring forth demons, raise undead and take control of your mind - even when they don't want it and have the best of intentions?
No?

Then you have no argument.
Regular humans/elves/etc simply don't represent a significant enough threat to warrant different measures.


oh please stop using your argument demons that or that demons are danger for you for mage doesn't have to be for other tevinter is capable handle them (as well before circle) humans can have mental disorders , be selfish or ruthless as we see humanity created a lot suffering.

And your argument control mind or hurt me is pathetic because humans did bad things as well rape , murder ,genocide and only few dick*** of humanity i don't see you screaming throw humanity into prison we can do bad things.


Demons being the main danger trough mages doesn't make mages any less dangerous. I dont' care if hte mage wants it or not - that is utterly irrelevant. As I said before, GOOD, WELL-INTENTIONED mages can kill off an entire village with ease.

Also, all those dangerous mental disorders - people who have them are either locked up inmental institutions, or on so many meds they are basicly tranquil...so no points for you there either.
And no, you can't compare mages to any minority or group in the real world.

And finally, yourargument is redicolous.
Yes, human do bad things. But humans aren't nearly as dangerous as mages, can be easily controlled, and finally - you can't throw humanity in prison. How would you do that? I'm asking from a practical perspective - who would be the one throwing humanity in jail? Who would produce food? Who would be the jailor? Who would pay for those jails? And how could a billion poeple throw themsleves into jail?

as i said you are intrested in your ass (what i can understand) because mage is danger to you so you please stop telling us how mages are necessarily inprisoned because you only show how biased you are because they aren't you.

Sorry sorry dude they don't imprison you because you have possibility mental disorder they lock you because you have metnal disorder so it is crap. so that one  

"And no, you can't compare mages to any minority or group in the real world."
yes i can they are still peoples and that they are dangerus for you is meaningless in this front because one group of peoples is dangerous for another as well one more one less.When you say that something is dangerous you comparing to something ordinary to yourself

no your argument is ridiculus you know why because human are dangerous do you renember jews and ****s do you renember many wars and i don't even reminding petty things that humanity caused who stoped inquisition for doing bad things exactly and they were only one group of peoples of rly many groups.Mage society would work perfectly for mages as tevinter shows (well not perfectly for mages more like orlais to non-mages) you are just blind to see that because you mages are dangerous more (comparing to you).And i don't see well-intentioned mage burning village at best we see child possesed by demon and i hardly think that peoples in village would be prefer be assaulted by bandits or lord who would slaughter them instead demon they probably don't care about who it is only what they are doing.

So my point that mages are capable creating society and survive without going into how they will treat non-mages is true.   

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 28 septembre 2013 - 07:23 .


#941
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

Plaintiff wrote...

Yes it is. If you think otherwise, then you're not paying attention.


Examples, please. I've never seen one in a Dragon Age game.


It's not in the past. It's absolutely happening right now. By using violence to prevent the Dalish from settling anywhere, by forcing the city elves to live in cramped, squalid quarters rife with disease, by allowing the townspeople to assault any elf that manages to claw their way out of the shtetl, by stamping out their faith with propoganda and sending templars to steal their mage children, the humans are driving elves to extinction.

What do you think genocide looks like? It looks exactly like what the humans are doing to the elves right now. Any student of history can see the signs.


I've never seen violence to prevent them from settling.
They force them to live in close areas--they don't force them to live in filth (if they do). My mother's family had fifteen children in it and they lived in a house with three bedrooms. Small =/= unclean.
Allowing them to assault any elf who gets out? When did this happen?
Stamping out their faith? When did they do that?
Templar issue is another issue entirely, it doesn't belong in this thread.

Who says humans don't deserve it? They absolutely do.


No, they do not.

You're generalizing. The humans who DO do it (if anyone actually does which I dispute) might deserve it. But not innocents. YOU said that crimes against innocents were acceptable, because turnabout. That's every bit as abhorrent as the first offender.

#942
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages
@EA: Plaintiff seems to consider all the humans that allows elves to be treated badly by not doing nothing to help them the same as the humans that treat the elves badly.

#943
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests

Plaintiff wrote...

Condemning the elves for fighting back against humans, while handwaving the violence enacted by humans agaianst the elves, is.

And that's what's going on in this thread right now.


You are completely wrong. No one is handwaving the actual violence exacted by humans against elves.

The only one doing the handwaving here is you by saying the elves are justified in crimes against innocents because "turnabout is fair play."

#944
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

I'm surprised you're still capable of being shocked by something like this. :?


I have a hard time wrapping my head around people honestly, and truly believing that ethnic cleansing is OK. People look at suffering, injustice, etc. in a game world, say they want to end it... and then ask themselves how they could do that to people they don't like. 

#945
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 912 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

The neighbor of the Dales was Orlais, an empire that was being created through conquest and expansion into it's neighboring territories. Kirkwall, Nevarra, Ferelden - all these nations were eventually conquered by Orlais at one point or another; in fact, Orlais "helped" Nevarra during the Third Blight, and then conquered them right afterwards. I'm not sure why you think the Dales engaging Orlais in trade would have made any difference when it has never stopped them from conquering other nations in it's long history.

From Orlais, you mean. Let's not pretend the elves rebuked all of humanity simply because they refused to open relations with the fanatical empire that wanted to conquer and convert them.


Orlais doesn't actually spend most of it's time conquering other lands. And most of the time it does, it can only conquer individual city states. Ferelden was the only other nation state it ever conquered and that was the result of a mad emperor and trechery within the Ferelden bannorn. Either way though, treating with Orlais responsibly was still important for the Dales. Antagonizing powerful neighbors is a foolish policy for any state.

But it's not a war with Orlais that was even the real problem for the elves, its the decades of decisons that caused humanity to hate them, culminating in the sacking of the seat of the Chantry. Anti-elven sentiment became so pronounced that a Divine called for a holy war against them and so many people answered that it turned the tide in a war the elves were at the time winning.


LobselVith8 wrote...
It doesn't mean the protagonist can't, either. You might prefer playing as a protagonist who favors Orlais and the Chantry, but I'd rather play as a proactive protagonist who helps free his people. I think liberating the Dales from the Orlesian Empire so that elves can finally have a homeland of their own - after so many centuries of living under the subjugation of human tyranny - is worth the effort. I could care less about Celene or Gaspard's little war over the throne.


What I'm trying to say is that you may have to care, practically speaking. The Inquistion's mandate is (presumably) to restore order to the world. In order to do that there are almost certainly going to be concerns of realpolitik the Inquisitor might have to consider.

LobselVith8 wrote...
There are a sufficient amount of Andrastians in Rivain that they tried to expel the Qunari converts, and ended up killing plenty of Rivain people who followed the Qun. Countless people were murdered: "And again, when the Rivain Chantry and nationalist forces, unable to convert its people back to the worship of the Maker, tried a purge by the sword, slaughtering countless unarmed people and burying them in mass graves."


But as you just quoted from the codex, It wasn't just the Andrastian forces that particiapted in that, it was nationalist forces as well. Both the Rivain codex entry from Dragon Age Origins and World of Thedas cofnrim that Andrastianism was and still is the minoirty in Rivain. Genetivi even mentions that "resistance to the Chant goes deeper than the Qunari War." He even says "the Chant of Light never truly reached the ears of these people," so Rivain has been a non Chantry country for essentially it's entire history.

LobselVith8 wrote...
There were different Cults of the Maker; Kordillus Drakon simply nationalized his and imposed it on the people as the one, true religion. "There were many converts, including powerful people in the Imperium and in the city-states of what is now Orlais. Such was the power of the Maker's word that the young King Drakon undertook a series of Exalted Marches meant to unite the city-states and create an empire solely dedicated to the Maker's will. The Orlesian Empire became the seat of the Chantry's power, the Grand Cathedral in Val Royeaux the source of the movement that birthed the organized Chantry as we know it today."

Also, the Orlesian Empire had issues with the Dales since Drakon's reign as the first Emperor, since it prevented him from conquering the Free Marches.


But it doesn't say he actually ever tried to expand into the Dales or wanted to destroy or attack them. If anything the "pressures from the Dales" seem like something they caused. Otherwise how would that stop him from expanding into the Free Marches?

LobselVith8 wrote...
It's been worse for centuries for the elves; you might be content with the status quo, but I'm not interested in doing nothing if the opportunity arises for an elven Inquisitor to help his people.


The simple fact is that a bad status quo is preferable to an action that will make things worse. The Dales wouldn't be "the only safe haven for elves" they would just be a trap surroounded on all sides by humans who'd now be angry enough to perhaps destroy the Elvhen once and for all. And the Dales aren't special in that regard. Cleansing the human population from anywhere would get you the same thing.

It's also worth noting that the status quo is very different for different elves. City Elves' lives can often become miserable, but frankly the Dalish all in all seem quite happy with life. Some may dream of a better day when they can settle somewhere, but especially when compared to what many other peoples can expect, the Dalish seem quite content with their day to day nomadic existence. I dare say that the Dalish Origin features probably the second or third happiest life for it's main character out of the six possible wardens. (Not counting the events of the origin story itself).

As such not all elves are going to fight with the same motivation or for the same reasons.

LobselVith8 wrote...
Based on what the developers have said, the Inquisition is an organization that can become quite powerful, so I see no reason why an elven Inquisition would have to capitulate to human rulers if the Inquisitior is the one who can stop the threat from the veil tears. And I don't see a new Inquisiton created by a follower of the Creators being absorded into the Chantry of Andraste.


Being "powerful" doesn't mean "absolute athuority" or "able to act with carefree immunity from consequnces."

And after the current crisis is averted, then what happens? The Inquisition needs to readjust to fit into the world somewhere. Exisitng to guard and protect the elven state that was built on the suffering of human refugees is probably not going to be a politically viable policy in and of itself.

The religion of the Player Character doesn't necessarily mean it is going to be reflected in the order of the organization itself or all it's members. I don't think all the soliders and workers are also going to worship the Creators even if they follow the orders of an elf who does. And after he or she is gone, what would become of the organization? My point about the origional Inquisiton was not that it was absorbed into the Chantry but that it was assimilated into society after it had it fufilled or no longer could fufill it's mandate. I still think the Inquisition will ultimately be tied  to the rules of the world it exists in.

Centuries of hostility aren't going to go away over night, and definitely not if they are exacerbated during the course of the game.

The true challenge for any hypothetical elven state is not really creating it, but maintaining it. Using force will not be a feasable long term solution in the end.

Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 28 septembre 2013 - 08:00 .


#946
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

as i said you are intrested in your ass (what i can understand) because mage is danger to you so you please stop telling us how mages are necessarily inprisoned because you only show how biased you are because they aren't you.

Sorry sorry dude they don't imprison you because you have possibility mental disorder they lock you because you have metnal disorder so it is crap. so that one 


Learn punctuation. I honestly have trouble following you.


"And no, you can't compare mages to any minority or group in the real world."
yes i can they are still peoples and that they are dangerus for you is meaningless in this front because one group of peoples is dangerous for another as well one more one less.When you say that something is dangerous you comparing to something ordinary to yourself.


No, you cant'.
No real world minority can compare to the mages. At all. Ever.
You cannot even comprehend my argument, since you seem constantly stuck in the same loop going "humans are dangerous".


no your argument is ridiculus you know why because human are dangerous do you renember jews and ****s do you renember many wars and i don't even reminding petty things that humanity caused who stoped inquisition for doing bad things exactly and they were only one group of peoples of rly many groups


*Sigh*
You really dont' understand, do you?

Humans are dangerous. But this is not a binary thing.
A gun is dangerous. So is a nuclear bomb. Are they the same? No. Do you treat them the same? No.
I don't know how to make this possibly any clearer, so I'll just repat what I told someone else:

Show me a well-intentioned mundane human child destroyingan entire village by accident.
If you can, THEN - and ONLY then - can you claim that humans are as dangerous as mages.


Mage society would work perfectly for mages as tevinter shows (well not perfectly for mages more like orlais to non-mages) you are just blind to see that



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted Image

#947
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

In Exile wrote...
I have a hard time wrapping my head around people honestly, and truly believing that ethnic cleansing is OK. People look at suffering, injustice, etc. in a game world, say they want to end it... and then ask themselves how they could do that to people they don't like.


Silly people are silly.

Usually some silly justification requiring silly logic, like the described "If you aren't part of the solution you're part of the problem" in this very topic.

#948
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...
Silly people are silly.

Usually some silly justification requiring silly logic, like the described "If you aren't part of the solution you're part of the problem" in this very topic.


This is the kind of thing that goes beyond silly and into scary, at least for me. If people believe this about fictional disputes, they can come to believe it about IRL ones, too. 

#949
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

In Exile wrote...

This is the kind of thing that goes beyond silly and into scary, at least for me. If people believe this about fictional disputes, they can come to believe it about IRL ones, too.


Non fictional people tend to not have magical powers or pointy ears, so they have no reason to care about them.

Assuming these silly people aren't just long term trolls, which I'm almost convinced of sometimes. B)

#950
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

as i said you are intrested in your ass (what i can understand) because mage is danger to you so you please stop telling us how mages are necessarily inprisoned because you only show how biased you are because they aren't you.

Sorry sorry dude they don't imprison you because you have possibility mental disorder they lock you because you have metnal disorder so it is crap. so that one 


Learn punctuation. I honestly have trouble following you.


"And no, you can't compare mages to any minority or group in the real world."
yes i can they are still peoples and that they are dangerus for you is meaningless in this front because one group of peoples is dangerous for another as well one more one less.When you say that something is dangerous you comparing to something ordinary to yourself.


No, you cant'.
No real world minority can compare to the mages. At all. Ever.
You cannot even comprehend my argument, since you seem constantly stuck in the same loop going "humans are dangerous".


no your argument is ridiculus you know why because human are dangerous do you renember jews and ****s do you renember many wars and i don't even reminding petty things that humanity caused who stoped inquisition for doing bad things exactly and they were only one group of peoples of rly many groups


*Sigh*
You really dont' understand, do you?

Humans are dangerous. But this is not a binary thing.
A gun is dangerous. So is a nuclear bomb. Are they the same? No. Do you treat them the same? No.
I don't know how to make this possibly any clearer, so I'll just repat what I told someone else:

Show me a well-intentioned mundane human child destroyingan entire village by accident.
If you can, THEN - and ONLY then - can you claim that humans are as dangerous as mages.


Mage society would work perfectly for mages as tevinter shows (well not perfectly for mages more like orlais to non-mages) you are just blind to see that



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted Image


not worthy discussion you start laugh when you already have mage society so arguing with you is pointless so i think i don't need better prove that you are biased as hell.;)