69 réponses à ce sujet

[immanji]

Tell me y'all! Let your opinions be heard!:happy:

Modifié par immanji, 21 septembre 2013 - 08:34 .

[ParkBom]

Star Wars.

[Gym Ldr. Maalik]

Star wars, i never liked star treks

[Bushido Effect]

Mass Effect and Trek. I never like SW. I have low expectations for the new Disney movies.

Does anyone know if they chose a director for Ep VII yet?

[immanji]

@flare thanks
@Maalik u too ;p
@bushido JJ Abrams wants ep 7 to feel "real"

[Tiina]

Star Wars

[Astartes Marine]

That's actually pretty tough.  With Star Wars you have stories ranging from the Old Republic Era (3,956 years before the battle of Yavin in A New Hope) to the Legacy era that's around one hundred years after Yavin.  There's even some stuff from before the Old Republic era going back to about 25,000 years before Yavin.  There's alot to cover in that.

On the flip side while Star Trek does not have nearly the same amount of material, covering only a few centuries rather than millenia, I find it a more interesting one.  The stories most of the time focus less on battles and militaries and more on single characters and closer examinations of their exploits.  Star Wars might have the edge in broad scale but I find Star Trek to be mostly on a more personal level.

[immanji]

SaTima-78 wrote...

Star Wars

Thanks gurrllll!

[immanji]

Astartes Marine wrote...

That's actually pretty tough.  With Star Wars you have stories ranging from the Old Republic Era (3,956 years before the battle of Yavin in A New Hope) to the Legacy era that's around one hundred years after Yavin.  There's even some stuff from before the Old Republic era going back to about 25,000 years before Yavin.  There's alot to cover in that.

On the flip side while Star Trek does not have nearly the same amount of material, covering only a few centuries rather than millenia, I find it a more interesting one.  The stories most of the time focus less on battles and militaries and more on single characters and closer examinations of their exploits.  Star Wars might have the edge in broad scale but I find Star Trek to be mostly on a more personal level.

I think Star wars covers more linear time, but Star Trek Haz it beat with all the dimensions! WE BE TIME TRAVELERS AND THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LOOKING MIRROR thanks for ur words!

[Tiina]

immanji wrote...

SaTima-78 wrote...

Star Wars

Thanks gurrllll!

Haha i love this!! and you're welcome :happy:

[Angrywolves]

Lore not popularity.
Star Wars is more popular .
Star Trek has deeper lore because more concise info is known about the history of earth, the federation and the other races.

[Olive Oomph]

Star Trek. Not only includes it histories and cultures of many races, but also full functioning languages.

[Pordis Shepard]

Olive Oomph wrote...
Star Trek. Not only includes it histories and cultures of many races, but also full functioning languages.

tlhIngan Hol mughwI' ghaj bing 'ej google doesn't pagh Har jIH. vaj pagh lugh. o.o

^ That was "I can't believe that bing has a Klingon translator and google doesn't. That can't be right. o.O" But I notice bing won't translate it back very well. xD

Modifié par Pordis Shepard, 21 septembre 2013 - 09:19 .

[slimgrin]

As hard sci fi, Star Trek has more interesting lore.

[Captain Crash]

Star Trek

Time Travel means things will constantly change forever. It always appears. I don't even know what the correct timeline is anymore...

[Cyonan]

Not really sure which would have a deeper lore, but at the moment I prefer Star Trek to Star Wars by a fairly large margin.

Also, is it just me or does Patrick Stewart appear to be not capable of aging?

Modifié par Cyonan, 21 septembre 2013 - 09:51 .

[iOnlySignIn]

Star Wars. It has many more writers working to create its lore, and hence more lore has been created.

Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 21 septembre 2013 - 10:00 .

[Sjpelke]

Star wars.....

[Melra]

I know very little about Star Trek, but I'd have to go with Star Wars, there's so much stuff about it.

[In Exile]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

As hard sci fi, Star Trek has more interesting lore.

Since when is Star Trek hard scifi?

We need to reverse the polarity of the tachnyon neutrino flow into the sub-buffer of the left warp engine field!

[immanji]

thanks everyone! UR all fabulous!

Cyonan wrote...

Not really sure which would have a deeper lore, but at the moment I prefer Star Trek to Star Wars by a fairly large margin.

Also, is it just me or does Patrick Stewart appear to be not capable of aging?

Sir Stewart is so Fab!

[Sjpelke]

Patrick Stewart is a perfect pick for any movie he has been in.

On topic, think that star wars made an amazing world build as that was desired for it, and executed very well. Star Trek was more about getting to other worlds and those could me written as they progressed.