Why is the general consensus of BSN that Cerby are easier than Reapers?
Honest clarification requested. No trolling intended.
Guest_Element 0_*
Modifié par Element 0, 22 septembre 2013 - 02:17 .
Modifié par FasterThanFTL, 22 septembre 2013 - 02:24 .
Modifié par Cirvante, 22 septembre 2013 - 02:42 .
Googleness wrote...
I find cereberus easier to counter then reapers.
mainly it's face mating husks, teleporting double banshee and ofc triple brute which makes you run around the room.
cerebrus troops are mostly easy to stun, slow, and only annoying are dragoons which easy to counter with splosions and phantoms which only need little stun or nade to die peacefully.






Modifié par tetsutsuru, 22 septembre 2013 - 03:51 .
Yes. I don't think I'd try to do it with the Fury though.tetsutsuru wrote...
Another question: is it possible to sub-20 solo FB:Glacier/Cerby/Gold without using Acolyte nor Armored Compartments?
N7didacus wrote...
Is not easier, but faster. I find Collectors the easiest to solo.
mybudgee wrote...
Polonium rounds X
ISHYGDDT wrote...
It's not.
prostheticlimbs wrote...
Cerberus and Geth are way easier to solo against. Reapers suck.
P.S. I hate Brutes :]
Modifié par QU33N_ANG3L, 22 septembre 2013 - 06:03 .
prostheticlimbs wrote...
Cerberus and Geth are way easier to solo against. Reapers suck.
P.S. I hate Brutes :]
Modifié par QU33N_ANG3L, 22 septembre 2013 - 07:28 .
QU33N_ANG3L wrote...
prostheticlimbs wrote...
Cerberus and Geth are way easier to solo against. Reapers suck.
P.S. I hate Brutes :]
ide like to see you solo against geth....seriously
Gold not even platinum