Xilizhra wrote...
It'll probably be a magister. Enjoy.Medhia Nox wrote...
One might assume that some Inquisitors would even be allied to this "Antagonist" Templar leader.
Which leaves the Antagonist Mage Leader to deal with... and I cannot WAIT to put that tool in his/her place.
There will most likely be a mage antagoinst anyway. The Veil has been ripped open. I doubt that happened by a templar using Cleanse.Xilizhra wrote...
Maybe we could have a sort of ranking saarebas? Would you prefer that?Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: That would be such a cop-out.
Not that I don't want to kill magisters mercilessly.... but I'd like for there to be a DA game in Tevinter where I can play a Magister who destroys other magisters, has no slaves and doesn't practice blood magic.
AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
It'll probably be a magister. Enjoy.Medhia Nox wrote...
One might assume that some Inquisitors would even be allied to this "Antagonist" Templar leader.
Which leaves the Antagonist Mage Leader to deal with... and I cannot WAIT to put that tool in his/her place.
Ofcourse you wouldn't want someone in your Circle Mage rebellion to be a villain
Modifié par Volus Warlord, 23 septembre 2013 - 02:03 .
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 23 septembre 2013 - 02:04 .
Well, your "theory" is already blatantly wrong, but I was referring to an agent trying to tear Thedas asunder with demons so that the entire continent would be easier prey for qunari butchery.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: I do like the Saarebas. It would mean he's Tal Vashoth - but I'm okay with that.
Or... even better. a Saarebas placed in Thedas to incite the mages to rebel so the world culls Thedas' pool of mages for an easier Qunari invasion.
Yeah, I like it. (since that's my theory on who is behind the rebellion)
@Volus Warlord: Incidently, it's also inherently stupid. See: Spartacus
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, your "theory" is already blatantly wrong, but I was referring to an agent trying to tear Thedas asunder with demons so that the entire continent would be easier prey for qunari butchery.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: I do like the Saarebas. It would mean he's Tal Vashoth - but I'm okay with that.
Or... even better. a Saarebas placed in Thedas to incite the mages to rebel so the world culls Thedas' pool of mages for an easier Qunari invasion.
Yeah, I like it. (since that's my theory on who is behind the rebellion)
@Volus Warlord: Incidently, it's also inherently stupid. See: Spartacus
What would you do if there wasn't?AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, your "theory" is already blatantly wrong, but I was referring to an agent trying to tear Thedas asunder with demons so that the entire continent would be easier prey for qunari butchery.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: I do like the Saarebas. It would mean he's Tal Vashoth - but I'm okay with that.
Or... even better. a Saarebas placed in Thedas to incite the mages to rebel so the world culls Thedas' pool of mages for an easier Qunari invasion.
Yeah, I like it. (since that's my theory on who is behind the rebellion)
@Volus Warlord: Incidently, it's also inherently stupid. See: Spartacus
That doesn't even sound close to what an Qunari would do
And if the "Agents of Chaos" are multiple people I really do hope one of them is someone within the Circle Mage rebels
Volus Warlord wrote...
Circle Mage Rebellion is inherently evil. Spreading a bunch of ticking time bombs all over the place. It's foolish.
Xilizhra wrote...
What would you do if there wasn't?
Xilizhra wrote...
What would you do if there wasn't?
Modifié par wolfhowwl, 23 septembre 2013 - 02:16 .
Xilizhra wrote...
What would you do if there wasn't?AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, your "theory" is already blatantly wrong, but I was referring to an agent trying to tear Thedas asunder with demons so that the entire continent would be easier prey for qunari butchery.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: I do like the Saarebas. It would mean he's Tal Vashoth - but I'm okay with that.
Or... even better. a Saarebas placed in Thedas to incite the mages to rebel so the world culls Thedas' pool of mages for an easier Qunari invasion.
Yeah, I like it. (since that's my theory on who is behind the rebellion)
@Volus Warlord: Incidently, it's also inherently stupid. See: Spartacus
That doesn't even sound close to what an Qunari would do
And if the "Agents of Chaos" are multiple people I really do hope one of them is someone within the Circle Mage rebels
Just shows Bioware is bias towards mages, more so if a Templar is invovled. It would also make the boring black and white conflict much worse.Xilizhra wrote...
What would you do if there wasn't?AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Well, your "theory" is already blatantly wrong, but I was referring to an agent trying to tear Thedas asunder with demons so that the entire continent would be easier prey for qunari butchery.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Xilizhra: I do like the Saarebas. It would mean he's Tal Vashoth - but I'm okay with that.
Or... even better. a Saarebas placed in Thedas to incite the mages to rebel so the world culls Thedas' pool of mages for an easier Qunari invasion.
Yeah, I like it. (since that's my theory on who is behind the rebellion)
@Volus Warlord: Incidently, it's also inherently stupid. See: Spartacus
That doesn't even sound close to what an Qunari would do
And if the "Agents of Chaos" are multiple people I really do hope one of them is someone within the Circle Mage rebels
Why would there be?Why wouldn't there be?
Come now, I never said anyone should burn anyone before the book was done. In any case, it's Internet fire; there'd be no way to actually burn people alive online.He'd probably call for a Bioware writer to be burned alive like you did when you had tantrum over lesbian relationships in Patrick Weekes new book.
Oh wait no he wouldn't, because he isn't mentally ill.
Reality frequently does not confirm to the golden mean.Just shows Bioware is bias towards mages, more so if a Templar is
invovled. It would also make the boring black and white conflict much
worse.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 23 septembre 2013 - 02:19 .
Xilizhra wrote...
Come now, I never said anyone should burn anyone before the book was done.He'd probably call for a Bioware writer to be burned alive like you did when you had tantrum over lesbian relationships in Patrick Weekes new book.
Oh wait no he wouldn't, because he isn't mentally ill.
Yes, it was deliberately absurd and not positioned as an actual threat.AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Come now, I never said anyone should burn anyone before the book was done.He'd probably call for a Bioware writer to be burned alive like you did when you had tantrum over lesbian relationships in Patrick Weekes new book.
Oh wait no he wouldn't, because he isn't mentally ill.
Still doesn't change the fact that you threaten a Bioware staff by burning him alive
That's a horrible excuse.Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, it was deliberately absurd and not positioned as an actual threat.AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Come now, I never said anyone should burn anyone before the book was done.He'd probably call for a Bioware writer to be burned alive like you did when you had tantrum over lesbian relationships in Patrick Weekes new book.
Oh wait no he wouldn't, because he isn't mentally ill.
Still doesn't change the fact that you threaten a Bioware staff by burning him alive
If you like.That's a horrible excuse.
MisterJB wrote...
If I get to choose, I wish it to be Evangeline.
Otherwise, I hope any templar antagonist is an atheist.
Yes, you read that right. I've always felt that making the Chantry a religious organization was a cheap way of making them harder to sympathize with because nowadays "Organized Religion=Evil".
So, if there must be a templar antagonist, I want him/her to use logic and fear to justify his/her actions because there simply is no way to relate to someone who does things because god ordered it.
So threats are okay, just as long as they are absured? Because making threats over anything across the internet is not absurd? It just has to be the right amount of insane? Good to know.Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, it was deliberately absurd and not positioned as an actual threat.AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Come now, I never said anyone should burn anyone before the book was done.He'd probably call for a Bioware writer to be burned alive like you did when you had tantrum over lesbian relationships in Patrick Weekes new book.
Oh wait no he wouldn't, because he isn't mentally ill.
Still doesn't change the fact that you threaten a Bioware staff by burning him alive
No it's not a good excuse to threaten a BioWare employee, no matter how oppressed you think you are.Medhia Nox wrote...
@Mr. House: It's a totally okay excuse if you feel like you're an oppressed minority.
My post was deleted for being problematic, but not deemed sufficiently so as to result in being banned. That should be all you need to know.So threats are okay, just as long as they are absured? Because making threats over anything across the internet is not absurd? It just has to be the right amount of insane? Good to know.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut