We need to get to 50 pages and I just know how.
Modifié par Element 0, 25 septembre 2013 - 06:49 .
Launching a precision strike... Soloing gold with dat M55 Argus.
Débuté par
BridgeBurner
, sept. 23 2013 08:10
-
Ce sujet est fermé
#526
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 06:48
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
That was indeed a hell of a party.
We need to get to 50 pages and I just know how.
We need to get to 50 pages and I just know how.
Retour en haut
#527
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 06:53
Knockingbr4in
-
- Members
- 1 884 messages
By throwing more stupid at it?
#528
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 06:54
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
Knockingbr4in wrote...
By throwing more stupid at it?
Yeap.
#529
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 06:57
didacuscarr
-
- Members
- 4 674 messages
Oh gawd. AQ will never admit that the Argus is decent, even if his life would depend on it.
He doesn't like it, so it can't be good.
And about recoil negating and the scope beeing "mandatory", I had no problems pugging plat with EM+HVB and warp rounds on it and I didn't even use it on a Turian. Headshotting was as easy as with other AR for me.
There's no need to further discuss this. Some just don't like it and for many that's a reason to say it's bad. I'm not a fan either, but I still admit that it's decent.
And with that beeing said...
...fuck you! I'm out.
He doesn't like it, so it can't be good.
And about recoil negating and the scope beeing "mandatory", I had no problems pugging plat with EM+HVB and warp rounds on it and I didn't even use it on a Turian. Headshotting was as easy as with other AR for me.
There's no need to further discuss this. Some just don't like it and for many that's a reason to say it's bad. I'm not a fan either, but I still admit that it's decent.
And with that beeing said...
...fuck you! I'm out.
- Alfonsedode aime ceci
#530
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 07:17
Beerfish
-
- Members
- 23 867 messages
DragonRacer wrote...
Hey, guys! What's going on in this threa--
I thought you were a red head!!!
#531
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 07:32
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
www.youtube.com/watch
M-55 Argus on a Turian Ghost
1. Turian Ghost with 55% stability
2. 70% Stability mod
3. Thermal Scope with 35% accuracy
With only stability mod and no scope the spread is very clear (especially on the 3rd shot that goes WILD) even at short/medium distances
With only the scope the recoil even with Turian passives is very clear and the weapon climbs if not constantly reset.
If you move even a milimeter or adjust while in mid-burst without 1 of either of these mods - the shots go everywhere.
With both the gun is stable and accurate, but you leave your damage barrels at home, no piercing means you need AP or Drill ammo.
Still, INB4 a-hole BSN'ers completely ignoring the clear evidence and derailing everything about ****** poor shooting on a barely 30 FPS laptop with trackpad controls while not even playing (cos I know this will happen)
M-55 Argus on a Turian Ghost
1. Turian Ghost with 55% stability
2. 70% Stability mod
3. Thermal Scope with 35% accuracy
With only stability mod and no scope the spread is very clear (especially on the 3rd shot that goes WILD) even at short/medium distances
With only the scope the recoil even with Turian passives is very clear and the weapon climbs if not constantly reset.
If you move even a milimeter or adjust while in mid-burst without 1 of either of these mods - the shots go everywhere.
With both the gun is stable and accurate, but you leave your damage barrels at home, no piercing means you need AP or Drill ammo.
Still, INB4 a-hole BSN'ers completely ignoring the clear evidence and derailing everything about ****** poor shooting on a barely 30 FPS laptop with trackpad controls while not even playing (cos I know this will happen)
Modifié par Element 0, 25 septembre 2013 - 07:38 .
#532
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 07:36
OrcWhisperer
-
- Members
- 387 messages
Element 0 wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
M-55 Argus on a Turian Ghost
1. Turian Ghost with 55% stability
2. 70% Stability mod
3. Thermal Scope with 35% accuracy
With only stability mod and no scope the spread is very clear (especially on the 3 shot that goes WILD) even at short/medium distances
With only the scope the recoil even with Turian passives is very clear and the weapon climbs if not constantly reseted.
If you move even a milimeter or adjust while in mid-burst without 1 of either of these mods - the shots go everywhere.
With both the gun is stable and accurate, but you leave your damage barrels at home, no piercing means you need AP or Drill ammo.
Still, INB4 a-hole BSN'ers completely ignoring the clear evidence and derailing everything about ****** poor shooting on a barely 30 FPS laptop with trackpad controls while not even playing (cos I know this will happen)
FTFY
#533
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:21
Crimson Vanguard
-
- Members
- 6 130 messages
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
#534
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:22
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
Crimson Vanguard wrote...
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
Well doh, it's +35% accuracy.
#535
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:31
robarcool
-
- Members
- 6 608 messages
Hmm. Need more Tuchanka cereal.
#536
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:41
Cyonan
-
- Members
- 19 355 messages
Element 0 wrote...
Crimson Vanguard wrote...
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
Well doh, it's +35% accuracy.
In practice it ends up being quite a bit more than that because accuracy reduces both the aim error and accfirepenalty stats.
For weapons like the Argus and Valkyrie, it's the accfirepenalty that you want reduced because it's what causes the final shot of the burst to end up in no mans land.
Or if you're me, it's what you use to make Harrier users unable to hit targets at long range unless they burst fire the gun.
#537
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:45
capn233
-
- Members
- 17 291 messages
Both scopes have accuracy bonuses, so it is more accurate with them.Crimson Vanguard wrote...
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
AQ is trying to prove that the scope is mandatory.
#538
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:45
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
Cyonan wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Crimson Vanguard wrote...
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
Well doh, it's +35% accuracy.
In practice it ends up being quite a bit more than that because accuracy reduces both the aim error and accfirepenalty stats.
For weapons like the Argus and Valkyrie, it's the accfirepenalty that you want reduced because it's what causes the final shot of the burst to end up in no mans land.
Or if you're me, it's what you use to make Harrier users unable to hit targets at long range unless they burst fire the gun.
That's not really the point. The point is - you're pretty much locked with these 2 mods on Argus if you want decent consistent shooting.
I mean Capn criticized me for wanting to make the Hurricane's recoil so high that the stability mod would be almost required for it to reduce it's sustained DPS. Here you have 2 "almost mandatory" mods. That does not make a weapon great.
Modifié par Element 0, 25 septembre 2013 - 08:58 .
#539
Guest_Element 0_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 08:46
Guest_Element 0_*
Guest_Element 0_*
-
- Guests
capn233 wrote...
Both scopes have accuracy bonuses, so it is more accurate with them.Crimson Vanguard wrote...
Maybe the spread was reduced by the scope?
AQ is trying to prove that the scope is mandatory.
It almost is.
#540
Guest_BioWareMod01_*
Posté 25 septembre 2013 - 09:00
Guest_BioWareMod01_*
Guest_BioWareMod01_*
-
- Guests
Thread Locked.
