78 réponses à ce sujet

[cap and gown]

RZIBARA wrote...

Did this honestly turn into a Geth Quarian Debate?

The f*ck....... smh

Necanor posted here, so of course it did.

[Sir DeLoria]

Reorte wrote...

Necanor wrote...

I'll simply say this: Targeting civilians isn't a sound tactic, it's a pointless crime. The Geth didn't gain any tactical advantage by attacking defenseless civilians. Deliberately killing civilians is of questionable tactical value.

What about long-term strategic value? As long as the quarians were still around the geth would be threatened by them. Any decent person would decide that that's going too far (and the geth eventually decided the same) but it isn't irrational.

The Quarians aren't completely irrational. The Geth could've beaten the Quarians through conventional warfare and forced them to accept the Geth. In a position like this the Quarian government would've had to accept. Not every war has to end in the complete annihilation of one side.

Of course I'm asking way to much of the Geth here, given that they were not much smarter than animals at that time.

[KaiserShep]

If the war had resolved itself without a retreat, annihilation of one side is exactly what would have happened, regardless of who won.