Steelcan wrote...
That assumption is based on the idea that any society where mages are free will INEVITABLY end up like Tevinter. It might be a possible outcome, but I don't see why coexistence is inherently impossible. There has to be middle ground between Tevinter's blatant abuse of non-mages and locking mages away in towers and treating them like cattle.MisterJB wrote...
I feel all the sympathy in the world for mages. But equal rigths implies mages and non-mages are equal and they are not. Mage have abilities normal people do not have, abilities that give them advantage over others and that also make them extremely dangerous.Lord Raijin wrote...
When it comes to war nothing is an act of terrorism. Both teams blow each other buildings up all the time.
The mages primary goals is to fight for their own freedom. To end the imprisonment of the Chantry by removing their manacles from their wrists and ankles; to want to be treated as humans with the same equal rights as any other non-mages. To be allowed to raise a family without the Chantry having to rip their child away from them to be sent to the Chantry.
How can people not feel sympathetic for them, and knowing their cause?
If mages are free, either the world will end in a wasteland where Abominations are more common than mages or a world where those without magic will be second class citizens.
I find neither to be acceptable so, I side with the Templars.
Maybe like a "go here so you don't go crazy" mage clinic. Or have a Circle, but allow more freedom, such as being able to come and go freely. That way they can be monitered or they get help when they need to, and they can also live a life outside of captivity.





Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Retour en haut









