Aller au contenu

Photo

My Mage Inquisitior wants to blow up the Chantry


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
267 réponses à ce sujet

#126
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Chantry controlled Circles fit the definition of slavery, which has been brought up time and again in the threads about mages and templars.


And which has been countered again and again...even by the lead writer.
But pro-mages cannot stand that.


He said it was a point of view held by some characters in Thedas.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...


Regardless of how one views the institution, some characters in Thedas condemn the Circles as slavery, so I don't see why you're acting like this is a point of view limited to posters on BSN.


And I'm condeming the common workplace in a capitalist society as slavery.
Doesn't make me right.


I don't think your exaggerated comment about the workplace is quite the same as characters across the centuries condemning the Chantry controlled Circle as slavery.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Also, there were Chantry members and templars at night in the Kirkwall Chantry; it's closed to civilians during the day, as we see during the Acts when Hawke breaks into the Chantry. 


Keep saying that to yourself.

Even Anders admitts he killed many innocents. 


Hawke has been to the Kirkwall Chantry at night, and it's apparently closed off to civilians, because none are in there the multiple times Hawke breaks in and fights people. I'm not certain how you're seriously trying to argue against what we explicitly see during all three Acts.

#127
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Steelcan wrote...

As much as I dislike the Dalish, you cannot argue that their embrace of magic has really put them on top of anything.  Dalish mages and Dalish mundanes are just as powerless at the end of the day.  They exist mostly at the mercy of others.


Of course not.
After all, they are divided into small clans (that can be wiped out by a single abomination ) and their Keepers don't have a good track record of keeping their clans alive in the first place (Zathiran, Metharari).

#128
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
The Chantry controlled Circles fit the definition of slavery, which has been brought up time and again in the threads about mages and templars. Regardless of how one views the institution, some characters in Thedas condemn the Circles as slavery, so I don't see why you're acting like this is a point of view limited to posters on BSN. 


The Chantry controlled Circle does not fit the definition of slavery, in fact David Gaider confirmed this. While their not free, their not slaves. Their prisoners of the Chantry.

#129
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
And which has been countered again and again...even by the lead writer.
But pro-mages cannot stand that.


He said it was a point of view held by some characters in Thedas.


Nope, he said it's not slavery by any definition he's familair with.
His view of it.




LobselVith8 wrote...
I don't think your exaggerated comment about the workplace is quite the same as characters across the centuries condemning the Chantry controlled Circle as slavery.


Characters say a lot of things...including mad and crazy characters.


LobselVith8 wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Keep saying that to yourself.

Even Anders admitts he killed many innocents. 


Hawke has been to the Kirkwall Chantry at night, and it's apparently closed off to civilians, because none are in there the multiple times Hawke breaks in and fights people. I'm not certain how you're seriously trying to argue against what we explicitly see during all three Acts.


Gameplay area design is not really relevant. Of all of the massive chantry building, you ever only see one room.
Also, raining flaming debries and Andered own confession.

I'm not certain how you're seriously trying to argue against what we explicitly HEARD Anders say.

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:08 .


#130
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Steelcan wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

Steelcan wrote...
So whats your point?  We don't see the Dalish mages going around blatantly enslaving non-mages.

I thought I had made it clear. Mage freedom will lead to elitism where mages are the top and non-mages at the bottom due to their magical advantages. It doesn't have to involve slavery at all.

natural selection at work.
If magic is truly a genetic trait it could just be the way humanity is evolving:wizard:



Since mundanes outnumber mages by 100-1, then that's ALSO natural selection atwork.

Looking up mages - APPROVED!

#131
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I think a homeland where elves have religious freedom and men, women, and children won't be killed in purges will bring less death and suffering in the long run.


What do you call "human nations sorroudning the new Dales unite and attack the bastard elves from all sides, extermianting the elven race"?


I doubt Nevarra or Ferelden are going to help strengthen Orlais, and I'm sure the Dalish Inquisitor is establishing alliances during his trek across Thedas.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

You're confusing an independent Dales with the Chantry controlled Circles, where mages has been beaten, tortured, raped, and even made tranquil. In fact, you defended the Chantry controlled Circles despite the bad that could happen, so I don't see why you're even bringing up this issue in this thread. 


I defended the Circles, because they are in principle a reasonable system that saves lives and because they are necessary.

You on the other hand support genocide and conquest because...well, because you're fixated on the Dales. IF you had any brains, your plan would be to find the elves a NEW home (not hte dales) in a peacefull fashion. Kinda like the Ferdelen boon. 


It isn't 'genocide' for the elves to reclaim the Dales. Also, humans lived in the Hinterlands, even when the new ruler gives the land to the Dalish to do with as they please; we find Shale there, remember?

#132
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Ravensword wrote...

With demon possession alone - the mages are outmatched. Think of all the Desire and Pride demons having a freaking FEAST with this current war. You think they're going to the Templars and common folk or the giant freaking light bulbs flinging spells around?


What's your point?


I think his point is "mages are in even deeper s*** right now"

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:11 .


#133
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Aren't soliders more advantaged than regular people? Maybe we shouldn't allow them to ever leave service and force them to live in seperate communites isolated from the rest of thedas.

If mages are really better than non-mages, than they should lead, because they would make better leaders. Holding back a society because those of lesser skill demand more than those whose skills earn them their rewards will only invite stagnation and discontent. Mages don't need to stay locked up, and they don't need to have any relation to their families revoked as is required under chantry law. They can have some restrictions placed on them, but to have every restriction placed on them? That is simple knee-jerk foolishness.

It almost sounds like punishing atheletes, or scholars, or engineers, or soliders, or cooks, for being better in their field than normal people would be. It sends a message of "Doing your best with the talents your given is wrong".

No, soldiers are experts in one field which doesn't mean they don't require products that they can't produce on their own such as food or weapons.

The abilities given by magic are not the type that would benefit a leader unless our system of governance is based on who can throw the biggest fireball (like Tevinter); thinking is, in fact, the one place where non-mages can easily outclass mages but that doesn't mean they might not be outcompeted in all other fields. You might see this as simply natural selection but I see it as one group of people forcing another to the fringes of society. For instance, in Tevinter, Jowan will sooner be Archon than Anora but I don't think anyone would argue she is the better ruler.
All of us are non-mages and we placed the man on the moon; amongst other things; so, I don't agree that non-magical society will be held back simply because magic is not present; in fact, relying too much on magic might have been exactly what has stagnated Thedosian development.


Is that fair to mages? No, but there is also no fairness in some being born with the ability to kill others with their minds while others aren't. I can train and study and become a better cook than the best cook in the world but I could never train to have magic.


If all the decisions are suddenly based on qualifications, than whats to stop non-mages from getting into positions of power again? They'd have just as much a chance as mages would in getting elected or being appointed. But that's not the way it's done in thedas, everything is run by bloodlines, whose your father and whose your mother play a much bigger role in getting into positions of power than any form of actual intellectual or presuasive ability. Than you have the unfair economic hurdles that prevent many others from ever having a chance in the first place because they couldn't afford to pay a man to teach their children useful skills in ruling. And all of that is meaningless since a person
like loghain was able to essentially stage a coup and take control of fereldan with ease, so where is this place that isn't ruled by the strong again?

You keep changing the goal post, saying mages can't ever be free since they'll be better than otherpeople. But than you go around and change it to some fake thedas were we aren't operating on medievil practices but living in a
modern society that judges ability before birthright. Normal people have just as much likelihood to try and take over
through non-democratic or just ways as mages would, and in a large enough number, would succeed.

MisterJb wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...
So you have a problem with that, but having the only positions of government be held only by those lucky enough to inherant a surname of importance, thanks to what their great, great, grandfather did a long time ago, is the right way to go?

Of course not but we have since, mostly, overgrown that exactly because nobles have no inherent advantage beyond that which we give them.
Magic has inherent power and always will; if the people stop thinking the Theirin blood is important, it ceases to be important but if the people stop thinking that fire doesn't burn, fill will continue to burn.


Just because we've outgrown it doesn';t mean thedas hasn't. And just because mages would have a chance at political power, doesn't mean that things wouldn't change as they have today.

You are ignoring the fact that thedas isn't earth, and are living a pipe dream that thedas is on the clasp of some great renisance where they stop believing in birthright positions of power and somehow rapidly modernize, and that mages are just holding up the process.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:15 .


#134
Red Panda

Red Panda
  • Members
  • 6 935 messages
Well, that didn't work.

Modifié par OperatingWookie, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:18 .


#135
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
You know Tevinter is also Andrastian, right?

#136
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
What do you call "human nations sorroudning the new Dales unite and attack the bastard elves from all sides, extermianting the elven race"?


I doubt Nevarra or Ferelden are going to help strengthen Orlais, and I'm sure the Dalish Inquisitor is establishing alliances during his trek across Thedas.



Yes, and I'm sure having a hostile elven nation as a neighbor will be sooo well recieved and that not evne kingswould dare to cross the inquisitor (and b.t.w. - I doubt "suport nad elven nation" will be part of any alliance agreement)

Who do you think the Inquisitor is?
What do you think will happen as soon as the Inquisitor isn't usefull anymore?




LobselVith8 wrote...
It isn't 'genocide' for the elves to reclaim the Dales. Also, humans lived in the Hinterlands, even when the new ruler gives the land to the Dalish to do with as they please; we find Shale there, remember?


I don't care how you call it. Reclamation, liberation, enlightement, restitution.
No matter what word you use, no matter how you try to paint it, the core underneath it remans black and foul.
An unjustified, unnecessary crime.


And maby that's exactly why the boon failed.

#137
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@Lord Raijin: So, Meredith's reaction is irrelevant - but every mage that cries: "I will blow up chantry's because I'm butthurt." Is totally valid yes?

You must have had an Circle Tower education.


Yes it is because it had nothing to do with mages. What happen to her sister was the result of irresponsible parents. Yes her sister would most likley be made tranquil, if she was clearly weak and fragle, but at least she wouldn't harm herself and others.

Mages who are under Circle control are prisoners. Even after passing their Harrowing they're still locked up because that is the Chantry's rules and teachings. If you escape you are branded as an apostate, and are hunted down by the templars.

I suppose I got my education from the Circle Tower, but apparently you got yours from the Chantry. Way to go.

#138
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Chantry controlled Circles fit the definition of slavery, which has been brought up time and again in the threads about mages and templars. Regardless of how one views the institution, some characters in Thedas condemn the Circles as slavery, so I don't see why you're acting like this is a point of view limited to posters on BSN. 


The Chantry controlled Circle does not fit the definition of slavery, in fact David Gaider confirmed this. While their not free, their not slaves. Their prisoners of the Chantry. 


The Chantry controlled Circles do fit the definition of slavery, to the point where Cullen even argues that templars have "dominion over mages by divine right". The fact remains that some characters in Thedas view the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery; to them, the mages aren't simply prisoners.

#139
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Chantry controlled Circles fit the definition of slavery, which has been brought up time and again in the threads about mages and templars. Regardless of how one views the institution, some characters in Thedas condemn the Circles as slavery, so I don't see why you're acting like this is a point of view limited to posters on BSN. 


The Chantry controlled Circle does not fit the definition of slavery, in fact David Gaider confirmed this. While their not free, their not slaves. Their prisoners of the Chantry. 


The Chantry controlled Circles do fit the definition of slavery, to the point where Cullen even argues that templars have "dominion over mages by divine right". The fact remains that some characters in Thedas view the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery; to them, the mages aren't simply prisoners.


In your opinion probably. The fact is David (The lead writer for the Dragon Age series) confirmed that the mages are not slaves to the Chantry. Having "domination over mages by the divine right" does not impliment slavery. Prison wardens have domination over his/her prisoners yet the prisoners are not slaves. They're simply prisoners, nothing more. Slavery in Thedas are illegal after all.

#140
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Nope, he said it's not slavery by any definition he's familair with.
His view of it.


While a myriad of posters in multiple threads have pointed out how the Chantry controlled Circles fit the definition of slavery. As I said previously, regardless of how posters see the Chantry controlled Circles, there are characters in the narrative who view it as slavery.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I don't think your exaggerated comment about the workplace is quite the same as characters across the centuries condemning the Chantry controlled Circle as slavery.


Characters say a lot of things...including mad and crazy characters.


The fact remains that some characters see and condemn the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery, from the historical Aldenon the Wise to pro-mage Hawke. By the standards of their society, they see the institution as slavery.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Hawke has been to the Kirkwall Chantry at night, and it's apparently closed off to civilians, because none are in there the multiple times Hawke breaks in and fights people. I'm not certain how you're seriously trying to argue against what we explicitly see during all three Acts. 


Gameplay area design is not really relevant. Of all of the massive chantry building, you ever only see one room.
Also, raining flaming debries and Andered own confession.

I'm not certain how you're seriously trying to argue against what we explicitly HEARD Anders say. 


Because you're pretending that civilians were inside the Kirkwall Chantry when Anders never makes such a claim. We never see any civilians at night, and it's clearly closed to the public the different times Hawke entered the Kirkwall Chantry; a fact you continually dismiss.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:35 .


#141
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 585 messages

Darth Brotarian wrote...
If all the decisions are suddenly based on qualifications, than whats to stop non-mages from getting into positions of power again? They'd have just as much a chance as mages would in getting elected or being appointed

Which would mean little or nothing if mages already dominate the infrastructure and are, effectively, Thedas nuclear energy.
Who truly runs Antiva? The Royal Family or the Merchant Princes?
 

But that's not the way it's done in thedas, everything is run by bloodlines, whose your father and whose your mother play a much bigger role in getting into positions of power than any form of actual intellectual or presuasive ability. Than you have the unfair economic hurdles that prevent many others from ever having a chance in the first place because they couldn't afford to pay a man to teach their children useful skills in ruling. And all of that is meaningless since a person
like loghain was able to essentially stage a coup and take control of fereldan with ease, so where is this place that isn't ruled by the strong again?

The fact that Loghain was able to ascend from peasantry to fathering a queen illustrates how Ferelden will give more opportunities to their lowest social classes than Tevinter. When was the last non-magical Archon?
But, you are right. Thedas is very much a medieval setting which doesn't mean that the elitism of the current system merits suddenly introducing yet another class of people with more means than your average peasant.

You keep changing the goal post, saying mages can't ever be free since they'll be better than otherpeople. But than you go around and change it to some fake thedas were we aren't operating on medievil practices but living in a
modern society that judges ability before birthright.

I used the accomplishments of our own societies to demonstrate how the lack of magic wouldn't, necessarely cause stagnation and to show that rights of the nobles can be overcome. The rights of the people who can touch you and make you explode from the inside out...not so much.
Take into account that you also used rather modern terms such as "engineer".

Normal people have just as much likelihood to try and take over
through non-democratic or just ways as mages would, and in a large enough number, would succeed.

In Orlais, the streets are illuminated through glow lamps that the Circle of Magi produces. This is an example of magic becoming the Thedosian equivalent of electricity. Even if we were to rebel against our respective governments, I dare say one thing no one would even consider getting rid of would be electricity.
So, how would normal people succeed?

Just because we've outgrown it doesn';t mean thedas hasn't. And just because mages would have a chance at political power, doesn't mean that things wouldn't change as they have today.

The fact that we have proves that it can be done. On the other, magic will never cease to be an advantage so how could a society where the infrastructure is entirely dependant on magic change?


You are ignoring the fact that thedas isn't earth, and are living a pipe dream that thedas is on the clasp of some great renisance where they stop believing in birthright positions of power and somehow rapidly modernize,

 I never said that. Only that we have proved it is possible.
It is not possible with magic unless the Circle system is employed.

and that mages are just holding up the process.

Well, we already have examples of magic being used as electricity. Therefore, there is no incentive to actually create electricity; on the other hand, qunari and dwarves have gunpowder and clocks for instances.
I do believe reliance on magic has halted the technological progress of Thedas.

Modifié par MisterJB, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:37 .


#142
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Chantry controlled Circles do fit the definition of slavery, to the point where Cullen even argues that templars have "dominion over mages by divine right". The fact remains that some characters in Thedas view the Chantry controlled Circles as slavery; to them, the mages aren't simply prisoners. 


In your opinion probably. The fact is David (The lead writer for the Dragon Age series) confirmed that the mages are not slaves to the Chantry. Having "domination over mages by the divine right" does not impliment slavery. Prison wardens have domination over his/her prisoners yet the prisoners are not slaves. They're simply prisoners, nothing more. Slavery in Thedas are illegal after all. 


It's a view held by other posters as well, and even a viewpoint held by some characters in Thedas who condemn the Circles as slavery, which was the original point of this line of discussion.

#143
Nimzo Witch

Nimzo Witch
  • Members
  • 45 messages
I want the possibility to favor a pro-mage ending in DAI.

#144
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
You're allowed to hold an incorrect point of view. ~_^

#145
Merlex

Merlex
  • Members
  • 309 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Maybe we will able recruit Anders as agent and his work will be blew up enemy buildings as well chantry buildings and even get time bonus when it comes about chantry because guy have
experience.:lol:

Necanor wrote...

Cool, can I completely enslave all mages then?


no because0 you can't enslave slave^_^


Could always collar them though. :devil:

#146
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I doubt Nevarra or Ferelden are going to help strengthen Orlais, and I'm sure the Dalish Inquisitor is establishing alliances during his trek across Thedas.


Yes, and I'm sure having a hostile elven nation as a neighbor will be sooo well recieved and that not evne kingswould dare to cross the inquisitor (and b.t.w. - I doubt "suport nad elven nation" will be part of any alliance agreement)


Simply because the elves would be standing on their feet, as opposed to their knees, doesn't make them hostile. And we don't know what kind of agreements or alliances the Inquisitor can forge yet.

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Who do you think the Inquisitor is?
What do you think will happen as soon as the Inquisitor isn't usefull anymore?


You mean the leader of an international army who is cementing power across Thedas?

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

It isn't 'genocide' for the elves to reclaim the Dales. Also, humans lived in the Hinterlands, even when the new ruler gives the land to the Dalish to do with as they please; we find Shale there, remember?


I don't care how you call it. Reclamation, liberation, enlightement, restitution.
No matter what word you use, no matter how you try to paint it, the core underneath it remans black and foul.
An unjustified, unnecessary crime.


And maby that's exactly why the boon failed.


I don't see giving the elves one place in all of Thedas where they can be safe and worship the Creators freely as an unjustified act.

#147
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

You know Tevinter is also Andrastian, right?

It's not. It's Imperial. The religions are similar but not identical, and Andraste is less emphasized in Tevinter, among other things.

#148
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

You're allowed to hold an incorrect point of view. ~_^


You already know there's never going to be a consensus between people who support the Chantry controlled Circles, and people who support mage autonomy. That includes the view on the Chantry controlled Circles. I'm partly interested in a Dalish Inquisitor because I think it'll give me a different flavor of story, especially since it wouldn't directly tie me to the Mage-Templar War like a templar or apostate main character would.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:51 .


#149
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages
Now I am curious on your thoughts on avatar the last airbender or the legend of korra MisterJB.

And whose to say technological progress is superior to magical progress?

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:55 .


#150
iOnlySignIn

iOnlySignIn
  • Members
  • 4 426 messages
You miss Ander's point.

The blowing up of the Chantry is symbolic. A direct challenge to the Chantry's authority. It's fun, yes, but not done for the purpose of fun.

Any further demolitions would be mostly vandalism.