Aller au contenu

Photo

A response to some criticisms of Mass Effect 3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
224 réponses à ce sujet

#51
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

#52
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.

#53
TheProtheans

TheProtheans
  • Members
  • 1 622 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

The ONE line that ABSOLUTELY destroys any notion that the ending is Deus Ex Machina.

"You have altered the variables, the Crucible changed me, created new possibilities, but I can't make them happen".


Perosnally I would not use an ingame character to define the the aspects of the game from an outside view.

#54
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.


doesn't mean anything....you are still solving his problem.

#55
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.


doesn't mean anything....you are still solving his problem.

He is solving your problem, he offers you choices to enact to stop the Reapers.

#56
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.


doesn't mean anything....you are still solving his problem.

He is solving your problem, he offers you choices to enact to stop the Reapers.


That doesn't make it deus ex machina, especially when the protagonist does something to get him to do this.

Once again, Catalyst to Shepard

"You have altered the variables".

#57
Xamufam

Xamufam
  • Members
  • 1 238 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.


doesn't mean anything....you are still solving his problem.

He is solving your problem, he offers you choices to enact to stop the Reapers.


That doesn't make it deus ex machina, especially when the protagonist does something to get him to do this.

Once again, Catalyst to Shepard

"You have altered the variables".

that does not mean anything it's nonsense, it's still broken
thay were going with an indoctrinated shep but chsnged at the last minute
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/17156973/2#17164113

he does not fit the lore or the theme

Ieldra2 review on the catalyst
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/16086761/7#17333660

Modifié par Troxa, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:17 .


#58
Pressedcat

Pressedcat
  • Members
  • 372 messages
The Intelligence isn't a Deus ex Machina: at best he's a user manual for the Crucible and a horrible histories book stapled together.

#59
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 358 messages
He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx

#60
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages
Yes, a user manual in a different language for the wrong product.

#61
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

#62
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Troxa wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

The Catalyst is a Deus ex Machina in both the definition, he shows up out of the blue to solve a problem with a handwave, and the literal latin translation also works, he is a god-analogue coming from a machine.


Buzzzzzz

WRONG

See my above quote again.

Shepard and the Crucible solves the problem, not the Catalyst.

In fact, in the ending Shepard is the "deus ex machina" to the Catalyst.

*sigh*

The Catalyst still presents the options, so he is showing us the way out of the impossible situation.


doesn't mean anything....you are still solving his problem.

He is solving your problem, he offers you choices to enact to stop the Reapers.


That doesn't make it deus ex machina, especially when the protagonist does something to get him to do this.

Once again, Catalyst to Shepard

"You have altered the variables".

that does not mean anything it's nonsense, it's still broken
thay were going with an indoctrinated shep but chsnged at the last minute
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/17156973/2#17164113

he does not fit the lore or the theme

Ieldra2 review on the catalyst
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/16086761/7#17333660



So an entity that decides to fulfill his objective by controlling the destiny of others doesn't fit the theme of the series?

Wow,.

Modifié par txgoldrush, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:27 .


#63
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 

#64
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

So an entity that decides to fulfill his objective by controlling the destiny of others doesn't fit the theme of the series?

Wow,.

That's not his objective. Are you sure you know the story's ideas well? I don't think you do.

Modifié par Br3ad, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:29 .


#65
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 


Shepard asking "WHO IS THE MASTER?" is enough.

The foreshadowing is there.

#66
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 


Shepard asking "WHO IS THE MASTER?" is enough.

The foreshadowing is there.

Lol, no. 

#67
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

So an entity that decides to fulfill his objective by controlling the destiny of others doesn't fit the theme of the series?

Wow,.

That's not his objective. Are you sure you know the story's ideas well? I don't think you do.


Wow, you missed what I have said entirely.

#68
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 


Shepard asking "WHO IS THE MASTER?" is enough.

The foreshadowing is there.

Lol, no. 


No, your argument is this....I didn't like the foreshadowing so it never happened

Stop being ignorant.

Modifié par txgoldrush, 28 septembre 2013 - 10:32 .


#69
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 


Shepard asking "WHO IS THE MASTER?" is enough.

The foreshadowing is there.

Lol, no. 


No, your argument is this....I didn't like the foreshadowing so it never happened

Stop being ignorant.

Funny considering that isn't my argument at all. My argument is saying, "Reapers aren't the master," does not forshadow a computer program that harvests life to protect life. That's has to be the dumbest thing I've heard from you yet.

#70
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

So an entity that decides to fulfill his objective by controlling the destiny of others doesn't fit the theme of the series?

Wow,.

That's not his objective. Are you sure you know the story's ideas well? I don't think you do.


Wow, you missed what I have said entirely.

His objective is not to control the destiny of anything. It is to find an end to the conflict. Destiny is irrelevant. 

#71
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

He is clearly a Deus ex Machina. He comes out of the blue to offer a solution to a problem.

Your own ignorance does not change that Tx


He only comes out of the blue to you because you failed to see the foreshadowing.  He was foreshadowed on Thessia.

No he wasn't. 


Shepard asking "WHO IS THE MASTER?" is enough.

The foreshadowing is there.

Lol, no. 


No, your argument is this....I didn't like the foreshadowing so it never happened

Stop being ignorant.

Funny considering that isn't my argument at all. My argument is saying, "Reapers aren't the master," does not forshadow a computer program that harvests life to protect life. That's has to be the dumbest thing I've heard from you yet.


Oh, and did you miss the foreshadowing on Rannoch as well.....

LOL

God, anti enders can be ignorant.

#72
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Oh, and did you miss the foreshadowing on Rannoch as well.....

LOL

God, anti enders can be ignorant.


Oh the sweet irony from you

#73
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

So an entity that decides to fulfill his objective by controlling the destiny of others doesn't fit the theme of the series?

Wow,.

That's not his objective. Are you sure you know the story's ideas well? I don't think you do.


Wow, you missed what I have said entirely.

His objective is not to control the destiny of anything. It is to find an end to the conflict. Destiny is irrelevant. 


ends - to find an end to the conflict

means - by controlling the destiny of others

conflict - Shepard opposes the means of the Catalyst but not necessarily its ends.

The theme revolves around its MEANS, not its ENDS

#74
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Oh, and did you miss the foreshadowing on Rannoch as well.....

LOL

God, anti enders can be ignorant.


Oh the sweet irony from you


 I don't defend the game with elements that aren't there.....but most anti enders criticize the ending based on elements that don't exist or things that aren't true.

Hence, "they don't get it".

#75
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Oh, and did you miss the foreshadowing on Rannoch as well.....

LOL

God, anti enders can be ignorant.


Oh the sweet irony from you


 I don't defend the game with elements that aren't there.....but most anti enders criticize the ending based on elements that don't exist or things that aren't true.

Hence, "they don't get it".


Nope