So, what's your opinion of Lancer?
#51
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:05
What are you Err Coots now?
#52
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:10
jamesbrown3 wrote...
RedJohn wrote...
Also, I don't like Lancer on Turian Soldier.
Come at me BSN.
Its not very smart to use the lancer on him. the way marksmen works and all. its better to use it on the Sentinel, where more power usage helps with the cool-down on the lancer lol.
but I do agree with you, the FQE is great with it.
QTF
To use the Lancer effectively the player has to be able to compensate for the recoil to make the bullets go into the same place. The Lancer should not be fired from the hip, the accuracy is terrible, you can only do this vs a Brute or an Atlas. When zoomed in the accuracy is a lot better.
#53
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:18
Tokenusername wrote...
Good job asking for people's opinions and then telling them they're wrong when you disagree.
What are you Err Coots now?
Opinions and facts are not the same.
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
XFG-65 wrote...
For me, it's the best assault rifle. I don't like using the particle rifle on anything besides the destoryer or juggernaut. The harrier is kind of annoying because of the whole ammo issue. Have fun using the harrier on dagger hazard/condor/vancouver/glacier.
Wat?
#54
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:18
Tokenusername wrote...
Good job asking for people's opinions and then telling them they're wrong when you disagree.
What are you Err Coots now?
No, he's just another blip.
#55
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:19
#56
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:20
RedJohn wrote...
Wat?
What, so I don't even get a '65 WAT' meme? Disappointed.
#57
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:23
Tell me your deeps math, ThreadJohn.RedJohn wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Good job asking for people's opinions and then telling them they're wrong when you disagree.
What are you Err Coots now?
Opinions and facts are not the same.
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
#58
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:25
#59
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:27
Maybe if I get it to VIII, IX and X one day the wasted ammo wouldn't be as much of an issue, because the magazine size would be big enough. Until then I'll just use CSMG.
#60
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:30
Tokenusername wrote...
Tell me your deeps math, ThreadJohn.RedJohn wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Good job asking for people's opinions and then telling them they're wrong when you disagree.
What are you Err Coots now?
Opinions and facts are not the same.
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Typhoon being better than Lancer is something that doesn't need to be overproven.
Now, if someone really believe that Lancer is better than Typhoon they should really work in prove it.
#61
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:33
Ever heard the expression "use the right tool for the right job"?RedJohn wrote...
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Examples:
TSol: Typhoon>Lancer.
TSent: Typhoon<Lancer.
Typhoon's a soldier gun, CSMG is a caster gun, Lancers a Hybrid.
#62
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:34
Nice double standard.RedJohn wrote...
Typhoon being better than Lancer is something that doesn't need to be overproven.
Now, if someone really believe that Lancer is better than Typhoon they should really work in prove it.
#63
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:36
Evil Mastered wrote...
Ever heard the expression "use the right tool for the right job"?RedJohn wrote...
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Examples:
TSol: Typhoon>Lancer.
TSent: Typhoon<Lancer.
Typhoon's a soldier gun, CSMG is a caster gun, Lancers a Hybrid.
Yeah they're different weapons but the thing is that, on Platinum at least, the Typhoon is a beast and argueably the best weapon on several different kits. The Lancer is clearly not the best weapon on anything.
#64
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:38
Evil Mastered wrote...
Ever heard the expression "use the right tool for the right job"?RedJohn wrote...
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Examples:
TSol: Typhoon>Lancer.
TSent: Typhoon<Lancer.
Typhoon's a soldier gun, CSMG is a caster gun, Lancers a Hybrid.
Why Lancer is better on Turian Sentinel than Typhoon?
And yes, I know in some characters Lancer would fit better than Typhoon, but that doesn't mean Lancer is better weapon, because even on casters Typhoon will kill faster than Lancer, has more ammo than lancer, more damage output and take advantage from Thermal packs.
#65
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:41
On a weapons based character, as a weapon yes typhoon is better.RedJohn wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Tell me your deeps math, ThreadJohn.RedJohn wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Good job asking for people's opinions and then telling them they're wrong when you disagree.
What are you Err Coots now?
Opinions and facts are not the same.
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Typhoon being better than Lancer is something that doesn't need to be overproven.
Now, if someone really believe that Lancer is better than Typhoon they should really work in prove it.
But I wouldn't use a typhoon on an asari adept for example - lancer is a better option for hybrid casters.
Now you could say just stick the talon/paladin/hurricane/acolyte on there and be done with it, but the lancer gives us two things
1. Nostalgia - you can play as a a proper ME1 asari commando if you like
2. Variety - nice to have a different viable option, even if it isn't as good as say, the talon.
#66
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:41
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Reegar and/or Harrier > All
#67
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:42
RedJohn wrote...
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Human Engineer/TGI/TSent/GE/SE/Paladin/SI (and many more) vs Geth, both weapons with disruptor ammo: Lancer >Typhoon
Modifié par BioWareMod01, 29 septembre 2013 - 08:02 .
#68
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:45
Because he doesn't lose the damage output from warp and overload and his ammo detonations by wrecking his cooldowns with a overweight gun, and he never needs to waste time getting ammo, thats why.RedJohn wrote...
Why Lancer is better on Turian Sentinel than Typhoon?
Edit: Compare these two examples and tell me which one will be FE'ing and cheesing (if thats your thing) more each round:
Typhoon TSent
Lancer TSent.
It ain't rocket science.
Modifié par Evil Mastered, 29 septembre 2013 - 07:49 .
#69
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:48
#70
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:56
RedJohn wrote...
Actually, I prefer Phaeston on Turian soldier than Lancer.
RedJohn pls
honestly Lancer is the the best choice for a weapon for a TSol on platinum, especially U/U/P.
#71
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 07:57
This jellyfish understands.Curunen wrote...
On a weapons based character, as a weapon yes typhoon is better.
But I wouldn't use a typhoon on an asari adept for example - lancer is a better option for hybrid casters.
Now you could say just stick the talon/paladin/hurricane/acolyte on there and be done with it, but the lancer gives us two things
1. Nostalgia - you can play as a a proper ME1 asari commando if you like
2. Variety - nice to have a different viable option, even if it isn't as good as say, the talon.
I know the harrier pwns the lancer.
I also don't care.
As long as it's good enouth to work without killing the kits character, like certain setups do, that's all I ask of it.
#72
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 08:00
#73
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 08:16
MaxShine wrote...
RedJohn wrote...
For example I understand if you tell me that you like Lancer more than Typhoon because that's your opinion, but don't say it is better than Typhoon because that's not true.
Human Engineer/TGI/TSent/GE/SE/Paladin/SI (and many more) vs Geth, both weapons with disruptor ammo: Lancer >Typhoon
Anyway... RedMoron is just bored and just starts a thread 'A is better than B' which is not very smart to begin with
Why you say that Lancer is better than Typhoon on TGI? Typhoon has better damage output, can shot for way more time and benefits much better from thermal packs, the only issue there is if you get staggered, but that's totally player dependant and fixable with right hand advantage.
Same goes for Turian Sentinel, if you want to incendiary glitch Typhoon is better, if you want to mix with warp ammo typhoon is better as well. With GE Typhoon befefits even more from Hunter mode than Lancer does, knowing you can shot for more time more damage.
I mean, even with disruptor ammo against geth the only unit that would really become a problem is the Geth Drone for their sniping stunlock, but by default everyone rocket primes, so what I believe you meant is more situational, not general.
Also I don't understand why you call me moron, we haven't ever talked, but well, i guess you are the kind of people who can't have difference of opinions without falling into insults.
Modifié par RedJohn, 29 septembre 2013 - 08:37 .
#74
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 08:20
#75
Posté 29 septembre 2013 - 08:31





Retour en haut







