Ce sujet est fermé
Guest_Puddi III_*
I imagine many won’t believe that, preferring to believe I lean towards one side or the other— colored by their own preferences, just as those preferences color how they look on the arguments of others. And that’s fine.
Xilizhra wrote...
Are you just following me around by this point?AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.Navasha wrote...
DA2 was supposed to show the worst of the worst on both sides of the Mage-Templar conflict and Inquisition is supposedly going to start moving toward the direction of solving these issues, then I think breaking both sides up into smaller groups will likely be the answer.
Having the Templars split into the Red Templars, which will still showcase the arrogant, brutal, abusive Templars. Then have the remaining Templars painted in the light of Ser Thrask, who might actively oppose the Red Templars. This would give the player a clear understanding that not all Templars are villans.
A similar scenario with the mages would also seem likely then too. All the raving lunatic blood mages in group A, and all the competent sane mages like Bethany in Group B.
Maybe even have the Mage Group B and the "good" Templars all part of a single group, working together nicely. Perhaps that is what the Inquisition is meant to be.
So glad your not on the Bioware team
Guest_Morocco Mole_*
Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.
Plaintiff wrote...
I'm well aware of the difficulty of the situation. and that didn't stop me from picking a side very easily.
Filament wrote...
I like this part the best-I imagine many won’t believe that, preferring to believe I lean towards one side or the other— colored by their own preferences, just as those preferences color how they look on the arguments of others. And that’s fine.
Toward one side or the other. People patting him on the back here may adopt a much firmer hand if the red templars betray the writing to have this pro-freedom, anti-oppression bias that is so typical among privileged westerners.
Modifié par Herr Uhl, 30 septembre 2013 - 01:18 .
Ravensword wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
I'm well aware of the difficulty of the situation. and that didn't stop me from picking a side very easily.
Sounds to me like you're projecting real world issues that people face to a fictional setting.
Guest_Morocco Mole_*
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Don't lie you XilmancerAresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Are you just following me around by this point?AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.Navasha wrote...
DA2 was supposed to show the worst of the worst on both sides of the Mage-Templar conflict and Inquisition is supposedly going to start moving toward the direction of solving these issues, then I think breaking both sides up into smaller groups will likely be the answer.
Having the Templars split into the Red Templars, which will still showcase the arrogant, brutal, abusive Templars. Then have the remaining Templars painted in the light of Ser Thrask, who might actively oppose the Red Templars. This would give the player a clear understanding that not all Templars are villans.
A similar scenario with the mages would also seem likely then too. All the raving lunatic blood mages in group A, and all the competent sane mages like Bethany in Group B.
Maybe even have the Mage Group B and the "good" Templars all part of a single group, working together nicely. Perhaps that is what the Inquisition is meant to be.
So glad your not on the Bioware team
Nope, I was reading the OP then saw your post
ScarMK wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
I'm well aware of the difficulty of the situation. and that didn't stop me from picking a side very easily.
Sounds to me like you're projecting real world issues that people face to a fictional setting.
EQUALITY.
I hope you never work on a rpg.Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.Navasha wrote...
DA2 was supposed to show the worst of the worst on both sides of the Mage-Templar conflict and Inquisition is supposedly going to start moving toward the direction of solving these issues, then I think breaking both sides up into smaller groups will likely be the answer.
Having the Templars split into the Red Templars, which will still showcase the arrogant, brutal, abusive Templars. Then have the remaining Templars painted in the light of Ser Thrask, who might actively oppose the Red Templars. This would give the player a clear understanding that not all Templars are villans.
A similar scenario with the mages would also seem likely then too. All the raving lunatic blood mages in group A, and all the competent sane mages like Bethany in Group B.
Maybe even have the Mage Group B and the "good" Templars all part of a single group, working together nicely. Perhaps that is what the Inquisition is meant to be.
Intriguing. Do you advocate, too, for an even mix of good and evil darkspawn?Mr.House wrote...
I hope you never work on a rpg.Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.Navasha wrote...
DA2 was supposed to show the worst of the worst on both sides of the Mage-Templar conflict and Inquisition is supposedly going to start moving toward the direction of solving these issues, then I think breaking both sides up into smaller groups will likely be the answer.
Having the Templars split into the Red Templars, which will still showcase the arrogant, brutal, abusive Templars. Then have the remaining Templars painted in the light of Ser Thrask, who might actively oppose the Red Templars. This would give the player a clear understanding that not all Templars are villans.
A similar scenario with the mages would also seem likely then too. All the raving lunatic blood mages in group A, and all the competent sane mages like Bethany in Group B.
Maybe even have the Mage Group B and the "good" Templars all part of a single group, working together nicely. Perhaps that is what the Inquisition is meant to be.
J. Reezy wrote...
Don't lie you XilmancerAresKeith wrote...
Nope, I was reading the OP then saw your post
Compairing men and women with free will to evil monsters created with the purpose to kill others. Seems legit.Xilizhra wrote...
Intriguing. Do you advocate, too, for an even mix of good and evil darkspawn?Mr.House wrote...
I hope you never work on a rpg.Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.Navasha wrote...
DA2 was supposed to show the worst of the worst on both sides of the Mage-Templar conflict and Inquisition is supposedly going to start moving toward the direction of solving these issues, then I think breaking both sides up into smaller groups will likely be the answer.
Having the Templars split into the Red Templars, which will still showcase the arrogant, brutal, abusive Templars. Then have the remaining Templars painted in the light of Ser Thrask, who might actively oppose the Red Templars. This would give the player a clear understanding that not all Templars are villans.
A similar scenario with the mages would also seem likely then too. All the raving lunatic blood mages in group A, and all the competent sane mages like Bethany in Group B.
Maybe even have the Mage Group B and the "good" Templars all part of a single group, working together nicely. Perhaps that is what the Inquisition is meant to be.
Guest_Morocco Mole_*
Mr.House wrote...
Very good read. Good to see Bioware is not caving to the pro mages who think mages are innocent bunnies.
Even mix of good and evil Tevinter magisters if you'd rather.Compairing men and women with free will to evil monsters created with the purpose to kill others. Seems legit.
I never said all of them do, I said a vocal group do, and they know who they are.LobselVith8 wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Very good read. Good to see Bioware is not caving to the pro mages who think mages are innocent bunnies.
Being opposed to the Chantry controlled Circles and the Order of Templars doesn't mean that people think mages are 'innocent bunnies'.
Morocco Mole wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
All templars who do not break with the Order's position on imprisoning mages are villains. Nothing any game says will change that.
This isn't how it works.
Modifié par dreamgazer, 30 septembre 2013 - 01:27 .
Xilizhra wrote...
Even mix of good and evil Tevinter magisters if you'd rather.Compairing men and women with free will to evil monsters created with the purpose to kill others. Seems legit.
AresKeith wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Even mix of good and evil Tevinter magisters if you'd rather.Compairing men and women with free will to evil monsters created with the purpose to kill others. Seems legit.
Implying all Tevinter magisters are evil
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 30 septembre 2013 - 01:24 .
Guest_Puddi III_*
Herr Uhl wrote...
Filament wrote...
I like this part the best-I imagine many won’t believe that, preferring to believe I lean towards one side or the other— colored by their own preferences, just as those preferences color how they look on the arguments of others. And that’s fine.
Toward one side or the other. People patting him on the back here may adopt a much firmer hand if the red templars betray the writing to have this pro-freedom, anti-oppression bias that is so typical among privileged westerners.
What are you on about? To me this reads "People will read motives into whatever I write, and that is fine".
Plaintiff wrote...
I'm well aware of the difficulty of the situation. and that didn't stop me from picking a side very easily.
Retour en haut