If we could modify its power to merely stripping a mage's power, I would be inclined to agree. As of now, not so much.EmperorSahlertz wrote...
The Rite does have its uses.
David Gaider: I don’t think we’ve ever presented the idea of a mage revolution as being the best answer with an obviously good resolution.
#1201
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:22
#1202
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:22
Lord Aesir wrote...
While all true, as an alternative to Tranquility for mages deemed too dangerous and those that choose it, it would be invaluable.eluvianix wrote...
Also very true! So no, I don't think magic is going anywhere.
There _IS_ an alternative to Tranquility.
Death.
Why exactly are we treating mages differently from the other population? If a mage commits a deed that would result in death if they were not a mage, they should be subject to the same punishment.
#1203
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:24
So does sex. That doesn't mean you inflict it upon someone who doesn't want it.The Rite does have its uses.
And I'm not for killing them either. I'll design justice based upon what I believe to be just, not what's been inflicted upon those whose treatment I have no hand in deciding.Why exactly are we treating mages differently from the other population? If a mage commits a deed that would result in death if they were not a mage, they should be subject to the same punishment.
#1204
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:34
Xilizhra wrote...
So does sex. That doesn't mean you inflict it upon someone who doesn't want it.The Rite does have its uses.
And I'm not for killing them either. I'll design justice based upon what I believe to be just, not what's been inflicted upon those whose treatment I have no hand in deciding.Why exactly are we treating mages differently from the other population? If a mage commits a deed that would result in death if they were not a mage, they should be subject to the same punishment.
!. except The Rite and sex aren't even close to the same thing, so comparing them makes no sense
2. I'm afraid of your view of just
#1205
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:38
So doing that for mages is going to amount to the same thing for them.
Otherwise - I agree with you.
What is good enough for a man who murders with a knife - is good enough for a mage.
The difference - you cannot disarm a mage without Tranquility.
#1206
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:43
AresKeith wrote...
!. except The Rite and sex aren't even close to the same thing, so comparing them makes no sense
No, rite and sex are not the same thing. But the aplication of something undesirable on a person is a completely logical and sensable comparison.
#1207
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:46
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 12 octobre 2013 - 01:46 .
#1208
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:49
You're correct legally, but it doesn't make it justified. All it means is that the Chantry considered emotional ravaging to be acceptable punishment.Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: Do we normally force criminals into sexual situations now?
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
#1209
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:54
Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: Do we normally force criminals into sexual situations now?
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
To be fair though, I would rather get raped than be made trainquil, hell I would rather die, than become an empty broken husk.
The Rite is just.. Srsly, I can't think of a single thing worse that can be done to a person. But that's my perspective.
Edit: Maybe cutting off someones hands and legs off, and tying them to a bed for the rest of their life while not letting them die, would match tranquility.
Modifié par KainD, 12 octobre 2013 - 01:59 .
#1210
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 01:58
I agree. Having our emotions, and being able to dream is what makes life so bright. To take that away from someone, even in the name of the greater good, unsettles me greatly.KainD wrote...
Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: Do we normally force criminals into sexual situations now?
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
To be fair though, I would rather get raped than be made trainquil, hell I would rather die, than become an empty broken husk.
The Rite is just.. Srsly, I can't think of a single thing worse that can be done to a person. But that's my perspective.
Modifié par eluvianix, 12 octobre 2013 - 01:58 .
#1211
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:03
eluvianix wrote...
I agree. Having our emotions, and being able to dream is what makes life so bright. To take that away from someone, even in the name of the greater good, unsettles me greatly.
It's just perfect slavery.
Edit: Or, I don't even know. I feel like there needs to be a new word for it. Because atleast slaves still enjoy the fact that they are alive, hence why they want to survive and obey.
Modifié par KainD, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:07 .
#1212
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:07
I am hesitant to use that word, because of the connotation it carries (as well as the inevitable BSN explosion that occurs after.) But that is your own opinion. Is Tranquility degrading? Yes. Is it uncomonly cruel? Yes, without a doubt. But it isn't slavery. To kill off a person's emotions and soul like that is undoubtedly one of the inhumane acts out there, but it's not slavery. It is a whole other beast altogether.KainD wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
I agree. Having our emotions, and being able to dream is what makes life so bright. To take that away from someone, even in the name of the greater good, unsettles me greatly.
It's just perfect slavery.
Edit: I agree that slavery isn't the best word for it. It is hard to find a word that can encompass all the Tranquility is.
Modifié par eluvianix, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:09 .
#1213
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:08
KainD wrote...
Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: Do we normally force criminals into sexual situations now?
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
To be fair though, I would rather get raped than be made trainquil, hell I would rather die, than become an empty broken husk.
The Rite is just.. Srsly, I can't think of a single thing worse that can be done to a person. But that's my perspective.
Edit: Maybe cutting off someones hands and legs off, and tying them to a bed for the rest of their life while not letting them die, would match tranquility.
Even though the Rite has been abused, the only reason you'd be made Tranquil is for being a blood mage or abomination
#1214
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:08
eluvianix wrote...
To kill off a person's emotion like that is undoubtedly one of the inhumane acts out there, but it's not slavery. It is a whole other beast altogether.
Yes, I edited a little there. It is worse than slavery and it deserves it's own word.
#1215
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:11
#1216
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:12
AresKeith wrote...
Even though the Rite has been abused, the only reason you'd be made Tranquil is for being a blood mage or abomination
I don't care why people are made tranquil. I don't care for the fact that people are made tranquil as well, it's their problems, lol.
All I'm saying is, being made tranquil is a very bad experience. And being a slave, and being raped or killed, is a lot better fate, than being made tranquil.
Modifié par KainD, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:13 .
#1217
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:12
I only meant that rape is the punishment of the innocent - while Tranquility was the punishment of the guilty.
Guilty - because both the First Enchanter and the Knight Commander AGREE to the guilt btw.
No, I am not saying Tranquility is a good option... but it is not forced sex. I actually find the comparison grossly insulting.
I also think we should be careful before we start discussing what types of trauma's are better unless we've personally experienced them. It's a little bit insensitive.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:13 .
#1218
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:13
At the end of the day, it needs to be modified to strict magic removal, and then execution or whatever else would happen otherwise. The horrors of current Tranquility practice can lead to another rebellion if it were to be abused further down the road in its current state.AresKeith wrote...
KainD wrote...
Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: Do we normally force criminals into sexual situations now?
Abuses aside (and they are notable in the Dragon Age) - Tranquility was never meant to be used arbitrarily... it was a punishment for breaking the law.
As far as I know - we (in the United States) don't have rape punishments on the lawbooks.
To be fair though, I would rather get raped than be made trainquil, hell I would rather die, than become an empty broken husk.
The Rite is just.. Srsly, I can't think of a single thing worse that can be done to a person. But that's my perspective.
Edit: Maybe cutting off someones hands and legs off, and tying them to a bed for the rest of their life while not letting them die, would match tranquility.
Even though the Rite has been abused, the only reason you'd be made Tranquil is for being a blood mage or abomination
#1219
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:14
#1220
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:14
Medhia Nox wrote...
I actually find the comparison grossly insulting.
Elaborate.
#1221
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:15
But that's way off topic - and not appropriate for a game board.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:16 .
#1222
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:16
Good point. Codex says its a place for "accused apostates and maleficarum". Seems kind of useless since they could just be made tranquil.Medhia Nox wrote...
My question is... what exactly is Aeonar for?
Edit: Apparently it's the northern twin to Ostagar, and only templars know its location.
Modifié par eluvianix, 12 octobre 2013 - 02:18 .
#1223
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:16
You are right. We need to be cognizant of that.Medhia Nox wrote...
@KainD: I did. It's a terrible personal experience - but if you have not been raped, I would be careful comparing it to fictional events that can't happen in real life and saying that these fictional events are so much worse to something someone on these forums might have actually gone through.
But that's way off topic - and not appropriate for a game board.
#1224
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:17
#1225
Posté 12 octobre 2013 - 02:19
Not large holes, mind you. But you do have a point. I wonder if we will ever get to visit..Medhia Nox wrote...
@eluvianix: It also shoots holes into the "every naughty mage is made Tranquil at the whim of some tyrannical Templar mastermind" theory.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





