addiction21 wrote...
dragonflight288 wrote...
Morocco Mole wrote...
I must say my friends. The length people go to defend the Dalish about every single thing is certainly hilarious
It is also equally hilarious the lenghts people will go to to absolve the Chantry of any wrongdoing when it comes to the Dalish as well.
I see no one doing that. Only those that continue to point out the Dalish hands are just as dirty.
I have read 9 pages. Lobsel has pointed out repeatedly that there is more than the Chantry's version, and it can't be taken as gospel truth. His posts were taken out of context repeatedly, and often with some form of insult.
Over the course of nine pages, I have seen more examples of the chantry apologists going out of their way to make it look like the Dalish were the more guilty party.
Granted, some people have also called for some pretty extreme stuff so the Dalish could have 'justice.'
Me personally, I think taking
all the evidence from both sides into account, I feel like the Chantry and Orlais had the most to gain by starting the war, and the most motivation.
Take that as you will.