Very quick question - shield penalty on Hawk Missile Launcher
#1
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:31
Full fitness (health and shields all the way).
Hawk Missile Launcher: shield penalty reduction selected on rank 4.
Cyclonic modulator 4.
How much shields do I have?
How much shields would I have if I were to go with an adrenaline module instead of a cyclonic modulator?
Thanks.
#2
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:33
#3
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:35
Modifié par FasterThanFTL, 01 octobre 2013 - 07:36 .
#4
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:36
#5
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:40
#6
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:44
Devastator mode does not give shields...VaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
#7
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:47
6A gives +40% base shields.Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...VaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
But hardly anyone takes it, because the 15% damage boost is usually better.
Modifié par Evil Mastered, 01 octobre 2013 - 07:47 .
#8
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:47
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...VaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
You need to read Evo 6A...
#9
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:47
DM evo 6a gives you 40% more shields. That's 400.Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...VaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
#10
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 07:55
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...when specced the sensible wayVaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
FTFY
#11
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:29
cato_84 wrote...
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...when specced the sensible wayVaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
FTFY
Who needs extra damage? I'd much rather be able to take one more round from a Marauder. Besides, everyone knows the Destroyer is supposed to be played like a tank; let your squadmates deal the damage while you worry about staying alive.
#12
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:32
ndw542 wrote...
cato_84 wrote...
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...when specced the sensible wayVaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
FTFY
Who needs extra damage? I'd much rather be able to take one more round from a Marauder. Besides, everyone knows the Destroyer is supposed to be played like a tank; let your squadmates deal the damage while you worry about staying alive.
While I do take the shields instead of the damage I do it for different reasons. I am using the PPR, Typhoon (high damage weapons to start in general) so who cares about the 15% damage when I can stay out there longer firing. More rounds down range means more damage.
#13
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:34
#14
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:36
ndw542 wrote...
Have you tried not standing in the open?
Who needs cover? lulz Of course I am not in the open, but my though process stands. Makes my life easier.
#15
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:37
IDK it's 400 shields rather have the damage output personally. If you kill quicker I think the damage is the better option if you struggle to stay up and stay alive the shields might be the better option I guess. I'd still argue for drill rounds and geth scanner if survivability is the issue.ndw542 wrote...
cato_84 wrote...
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...when specced the sensible wayVaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
FTFY
Who needs extra damage? I'd much rather be able to take one more round from a Marauder. Besides, everyone knows the Destroyer is supposed to be played like a tank; let your squadmates deal the damage while you worry about staying alive.
#16
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:39
NuclearTech76 wrote...
IDK it's 400 shields rather have the damage output personally. If you kill quicker I think the damage is the better option if you struggle to stay up and stay alive the shields might be the better option I guess. I'd still argue for drill rounds and geth scanner if survivability is the issue.ndw542 wrote...
cato_84 wrote...
Ledgend1221 wrote...
Devastator mode does not give shields...when specced the sensible wayVaultingFrog wrote...
Without a Cyclonic IV and no Devastator Mode your looking at a flat 1550 shields. With Devastator Mode your up to 1950. With Devastator Mode and a Cyclonic IV your looking at 3450 shields.
FTFY
Who needs extra damage? I'd much rather be able to take one more round from a Marauder. Besides, everyone knows the Destroyer is supposed to be played like a tank; let your squadmates deal the damage while you worry about staying alive.
I believe ndw wasn't being entirely serious.................
#17
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 08:40
Ahh, apologies then.cato_84 wrote...
I believe ndw wasn't being entirely serious.................
#18
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 09:23
#19
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 10:10
#20
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 10:18
ndw542 wrote...
Who needs extra damage? I'd much rather be able to take one more round from a Marauder.

Personally, I'd like to just flat out kill that Marauder before its got time to get me down to such low health.
ndw542 wrote...
Besides, everyone knows the Destroyer is
supposed to be played like a tank; let your squadmates deal the damage
while you worry about staying alive.
lol
#21
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 10:28
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Ahh, apologies then.cato_84 wrote...
I believe ndw wasn't being entirely serious.................
I actually thought I was laying it on too thick, and edited just before posting to make it less sarcastic; I try not to be a full-throttle douche all the time, you know, for variety. Mayhaps I went too far the other way.
Modifié par ndw542, 01 octobre 2013 - 10:31 .
#22
Posté 01 octobre 2013 - 10:30
XFG-65 wrote...
MofuggerX wrote...
You mean the second best player in the world doesn't just... know such things??
Please refrain from posting such stupid comments in the future. You're making yourself look stupid. If you're jealous of my 50k N7, don't feel like you need to post stupid replies to proper topics.
N7 is completely meaningless, but I am jealous of the sweet, sweet rack in your avy.
#23
Posté 02 octobre 2013 - 11:53
ndw542 wrote...
XFG-65 wrote...
MofuggerX wrote...
You mean the second best player in the world doesn't just... know such things??
Please refrain from posting such stupid comments in the future. You're making yourself look stupid. If you're jealous of my 50k N7, don't feel like you need to post stupid replies to proper topics.
N7 is completely meaningless, but I am jealous of the sweet, sweet rack in your avy.
N7 is meaningful and you are jealous.
#24
Posté 02 octobre 2013 - 11:58
#25
Posté 02 octobre 2013 - 12:28





Retour en haut







