Aller au contenu

No romances for DA: I.


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
467 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
I am the type of person around here that doesn't believe that romances are necessary in the Dragon Age games. They don't really add that much to the experience, at least for me. Romance in video games isn't all that common; there are definitely good games out there that do not involve romance: see Rockstar and Bethesda games. I feel that romances add headaches for the writing staff. Who to include, who not to include, how much nudity is too much, who can date who, what political ramifications will there be, etc. I feel that the writing staff at Bioware is more than capable of writing connectable characters without the usage of them being a romantic possibility. I have found playthroughs of Mass Effect and Dragon Age where I don't romance a character to be just as rewarding as those who do. Basically, my main points are:

- Romances are too divisive. You will not please everyone and you are guaranteed to upset someone.
- Romances are not essential to the experience.
- Romances are not essential to character development. 

Now, given Bioware's past 5 games, I know that there will be romances in the game, but I do feel that this is a valid opinion to share regardless. I am sure I am not the only one on this forum who feels this way.

#2
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages
I like cliches. I like character developments. The hero always gets the girl. It's optional content. Just don't do it. Really, people will still ask for romances whether they are there or not. That will never change.

#3
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

Br3ad wrote...

I like cliches. I like character developments. The hero always gets the girl. It's optional content. Just don't do it. Really, people will still ask for romances whether they are there or not. That will never change.


While it is true that romances are optional content that can easily be ignored, they tend to bring a lot of nastiness with them as far as the fans are concerned. Hate letters, forum arguments ,etc.

#4
zMataxa

zMataxa
  • Members
  • 694 messages
Speaking of Romance threads - where did the one from this afternoon go entitled "Competition for LI with Companions"? It appears to be deleted - instead of locked or whatever.

I'd post here on this topic, but I'm still gun-shy after the last thread has disappeared.

#5
Guest_EntropicAngel_*

Guest_EntropicAngel_*
  • Guests
Too obvious.

#6
Steppenwolf

Steppenwolf
  • Members
  • 2 866 messages
Hanar, your argument is exceptionally weak. It's based on pure speculation about a writing process that you have no insight into and the notion that your opinion is the right one.

#7
Ferretinabun

Ferretinabun
  • Members
  • 2 687 messages
Romances are WAAAAAAY too popular with the fans.

Bioware already cater to those who don't want them by making them optional.

#8
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
Agreed on all counts. Since pleasing everyone is impossible, you might as well upset everyone instead.

For the lulz.

#9
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

BasilKarlo wrote...

Hanar, your argument is exceptionally weak. It's based on pure speculation about a writing process that you have no insight into and the notion that your opinion is the right one.


Where did I ever say my opinion was superior to another's? I simply stated that this was an opinion that was worth sharing.

#10
Dreymar

Dreymar
  • Members
  • 24 messages

zMataxa wrote...

Speaking of Romance threads - where did the one from this afternoon go entitled "Competition for LI with Companions"? It appears to be deleted - instead of locked or whatever.

I'd post here on this topic, but I'm still gun-shy after the last thread has disappeared.


yeah, I felt that was a really cool idea, as long as it doesn't happen with every character.

#11
Hellion Rex

Hellion Rex
  • Members
  • 30 037 messages
It is simple. Do not partake in the romances if you don't wish to romance anyone. It is quite simple. But don't try to take away the experience from people that do want romances in the game.

#12
Volus Warlord

Volus Warlord
  • Members
  • 10 697 messages
Think of it this way: If they are no romances in the vanilla game, they can charge through the nose for a DLC romance pack like Citadel.

Or the romances can be DA:I's inevitable Day One DLC.

#13
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

Ferretinabun wrote...

Romances are WAAAAAAY too popular with the fans.

Bioware already cater to those who don't want them by making them optional.

Actually they aren't, but the fans that they are popular with really like them. I don't think that this group should suffer because of the extremely volcal minority. 

#14
Guest_Seraph Cross_*

Guest_Seraph Cross_*
  • Guests
You forgot to mention equality

#15
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages
 I agree that many within this fanbase seem to have an unhealthy obsession with LIs.

However, the hero getting the girl (or guy, depending on what you fancy) has been a staple of storytelling (in general) for a long while now. It's an enjoyable dynamic for many, and for that reason, should be part of these stories as well.

Don't like it? Don't do it. It's optional stuff anyway. Some games don't make it optional (it's part of those stories).

#16
Volus Warlord

Volus Warlord
  • Members
  • 10 697 messages

Seraph Cross wrote...

You forgot to mention equality


Having no romances at all is the clear-cut way to ensure equal and fair fetish fulfilment preference representation.

#17
Enigmatick

Enigmatick
  • Members
  • 1 916 messages

greengoron89 wrote...

Agreed on all counts. Since pleasing everyone is impossible, you might as well upset everyone instead.

For the lulz.



Ah, the Casey Hudson development philosophy.

#18
Ravensword

Ravensword
  • Members
  • 6 185 messages
You're a good myn, Hanar, but this thread will soon be full of lots of butthurt and derailment, at which point it'll be locked.

#19
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 408 messages

Volus Warlord wrote...

Think of it this way: If they are no romances in the vanilla game, they can charge through the nose for a DLC romance pack like Citadel.

Or the romances can be DA:I's inevitable Day One DLC.


We already have companions being day one DLC do we really need more. :(

#20
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 810 messages

greengoron89 wrote...
Agreed on all counts. Since pleasing everyone is impossible, you might as well upset everyone instead.
For the lulz.

This. The romance aspect has gotten way out of a control, from something "extra" to a main selling point for some.

#21
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests

eluvianix wrote...

It is simple. Do not partake in the romances if you don't wish to romance anyone. It is quite simple. But don't try to take away the experience from people that do want romances in the game.


I disagree. I think people have become too obsessed with romances, to the point where other things like functional gameplay, coherent storytelling, etc. become secondary. They use romances as a form of escapism and wish fulfillment, or exploit romances to serve their political agendas.

I think in order to counter this, romances should simply be removed. People will be forced to appreciate the game for what it is, and not for overemphasized side content.

#22
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 408 messages

Enigmatick wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Agreed on all counts. Since pleasing everyone is impossible, you might as well upset everyone instead.

For the lulz.



Ah, the Casey Hudson development philosophy.


XD 

Should we get RGB endings in Inquistion as well? And OGB/Morrigan's child can be the starbrat in DA.

#23
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

HYR 2.0 wrote...

 I agree that many within this fanbase seem to have an unhealthy obsession with LIs.

However, the hero getting the girl (or guy, depending on what you fancy) has been a staple of storytelling (in general) for a long while now. It's an enjoyable dynamic for many, and for that reason, should be part of these stories as well.

Don't like it? Don't do it. It's optional stuff anyway. Some games don't make it optional (it's part of those stories).


I think the main issue is that romances for me is that they didn't feel as optional in DA2 as they did in DAO. I couldn't really express that I considered a person a friend without flirting with them. That's how I felt anyways. It feels that romance has become an integral part of creating a friendship in Bioware games.

#24
Volus Warlord

Volus Warlord
  • Members
  • 10 697 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Volus Warlord wrote...

Think of it this way: If they are no romances in the vanilla game, they can charge through the nose for a DLC romance pack like Citadel.

Or the romances can be DA:I's inevitable Day One DLC.


We already have companions being day one DLC do we really need more. :(


Since the romances are optional content, I see no harm in not making them immediately accessible.

#25
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 408 messages

greengoron89 wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

It is simple. Do not partake in the romances if you don't wish to romance anyone. It is quite simple. But don't try to take away the experience from people that do want romances in the game.


I disagree. I think people have become too obsessed with romances, to the point where other things like functional gameplay, coherent storytelling, etc. become secondary. They use romances as a form of escapism and wish fulfillment, or exploit romances to serve their political agendas.

I think in order to counter this, romances should simply be removed. People will be forced to appreciate the game for what it is, and not for overemphasized side content.


Are you seriously suggesting that people don't enjoy both? 

Cause I do.

There is no one or the other. You can like more than one thing about a story.