And that's canon now? Do we deduce from the naming of the ending videos (literally red/green/blue) that Catalyst is lying about the choices being Destroy/Synthesis/Control because they are not listed as such?the game files say the following
Stargazer scene ???????
Débuté par
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
, oct. 07 2013 10:21
#26
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 01:21
AlexMBrennan
-
- Members
- 7 002 messages
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 01:27
tpush
-
- Members
- 6 messages
AlexMBrennan wrote...
And that's canon now? Do we deduce from the naming of the ending videos (literally red/green/blue) that Catalyst is lying about the choices being Destroy/Synthesis/Control because they are not listed as such?the game files say the following
Whoa, calm down, I never said anything about canon. The text I posted is just what the game files refer to as "Stage Directions". I just thought some people would like to know about them.
#28
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 02:28
giveamanafish...
-
- Members
- 374 messages
Omega Torsk wrote...
Your glibness aside, you make a good point...ismoketoomuch wrote...
MegaIllusiveMan wrote...
Omega Torsk wrote...
snip
snip.
Snip
Sorry, I had just been reading about Chris Priestley's departure from Bioware and some of the comments about him on other sites put me in a bad mood and reminded me of the frustration many people felt with the other peoples' responses to ME3. With Priestley, unless he went around sitting on small babies, crushing them, and so on, he was just a guy. Priestley was apparently hated by some for his sarcastic responses to some of the anti-ME3 campaigners. But a lot of these people went off on huge tangents on ME3 where it was apparent they were missing the point of, or misinterpreting some scene or part of the story or key conversations. Like here.
#29
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 02:34
MegaIllusiveMan
-
- Members
- 4 440 messages
ismoketoomuch wrote...
Omega Torsk wrote...
Your glibness aside, you make a good point...ismoketoomuch wrote...
MegaIllusiveMan wrote...
Omega Torsk wrote...
snip
snip.
Snip
Sorry, I had just been reading about Chris Priestley's departure from Bioware and some of the comments about him on other sites put me in a bad mood and reminded me of the frustration many people felt with the other peoples' responses to ME3. With Priestley, unless he went around sitting on small babies, crushing them, and so on, he was just a guy. Priestley was apparently hated by some for his sarcastic responses to some of the anti-ME3 campaigners. But a lot of these people went off on huge tangents on ME3 where it was apparent they were missing the point of, or misinterpreting some scene or part of the story or key conversations. Like here.
That wasn't what I meant... That Deception isn't considered Cannon because I hated or something like that. Hell, I didn't even read Deception after I saw that it wasn't considered Cannon BY BIOWARE. And I liked the endings. (If that's what you're not talking about, dismiss it
)
#30
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 03:49
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
-
- Guests
ismoketoomuch wrote...
MegaIllusiveMan wrote...
Omega Torsk wrote...
In a very headcanon-centric scenario, I'd like to imagine the son/daughter of Admiral Anderson and Kahlee Sanders as a future protagonist... (Hey, she could have been in the early stages in ME3. Deception confirmed that they were making whoopie at that point, and that's right before ME3 takes place).
But yeah, the Stargazer scene... when I saw it originally (back in March of '12), it felt like salt being rubbed on an already-gaping wound of confusion. It didn't make sense. Why were they talking about space travel being a future possibility in a universe where it's commonplace? They were obviously not on Earth, due to there being two moons where they were. Was it a stranded colony that somehow heard about Shepard's heroics? Were they the descendants of the standed Normandy crew?
I just... GAH! "Speculation from Everyones."
Deception isn't considered cannon.
"Why were they talking about space travel being a future possibility in a[n] universe where it's commonplace?"
What the kid asks is "When can I go to the stars?" So it's a personal question, not like "When will we be able to go to the stars?" Or "Will we ever be able to go to the stars?" Or "Will I ever be able to go to the stars even tho Omega Torsk and Megaillusiveman say this should be only understood as being possibie in the fuure?"
See the difference?
That was very odd where the kid ask when i can go to the stars first when hear that i was thinking that the refuse ending is the real ending
#31
Posté 10 octobre 2013 - 08:27
wright1978
-
- Members
- 8 116 messages
Leftover of the original galactic dark age endings where the only survivors have devolved so that they don't have any written history or any technology.
Coupled with a deliberate 4th wall breaking shout out using Buzz Aldrin.
Coupled with a deliberate 4th wall breaking shout out using Buzz Aldrin.
#32
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
Posté 11 octobre 2013 - 09:52
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
Guest_Darth Revan91_*
-
- Guests
wright1978 wrote...
Leftover of the original galactic dark age endings where the only survivors have devolved so that they don't have any written history or any technology.
Coupled with a deliberate 4th wall breaking shout out using Buzz Aldrin.
You mean from the original ending
