48 réponses à ce sujet

[PnXMarcin1PL]

Sadly I expect sys requirements to be like that. If so, well... Minimum settings are a go for me
Still I'm considering to buy gaming laptop with:

Intel i7 Q4800MQ - 2,8Ghz - 3,7GHz Turbo with Intel HD 4600
16GB DDR3 RAM
1TB Hitachi HDD 7200rpm 32mb cache
2x AMD Radeon HD 8970m 4gb
Windows 8.1

Is this configuration going to last for 2-3 years ? With this config I'll have 3 GPU's, 2 working in crossfire and one in CPU.

[Maria Caliban]

NagarAsh wrote...

im into gaming but at the end of the day i had to go with intel chip especially coz it holds for longer period of time before dying on its user and i need it for the 3Ds Max rendering and stuff in animation...now if im not wrong...which im most definitely not...if im not wrong the amd/nvedia will work excellent but for a year or so before it starts saying goodbye...

You're wrong.

NagarAsh wrote...

1stly, is th game gonna have as high default/minimum graphics as in case of ubisoft games ?

Yes, DA:I will have "high" minimum requirements like Assassin's Creed.

2ndly, if the graphics is gonna be so high even at the minimum settings will there be a textures patch that could help fans who cant afford those high end systems (like me) ?

The only time I've seen a texture patch, it was for HD textures. Those take more resources, not less.

Modifié par Maria Caliban, 15 octobre 2013 - 09:19 .

[AlexJK]

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I'm considering to buy gaming laptop with:

Intel i7 Q4800MQ - 2,8Ghz - 3,7GHz Turbo with Intel HD 4600
16GB DDR3 RAM
1TB Hitachi HDD 7200rpm 32mb cache
2x AMD Radeon HD 8970m 4gb
Windows 8.1

How much is that going to *cost* in a laptop??? Wow...

[PnXMarcin1PL]

im not getting alienware because its overpriced. Im planning to get clevo it will cost 9300 zlotis in euro around 2330 euro but im buying it for my company as working laptop so ill have an invoice as purchase proof. so later i will have tax rebate at inland revenue.

[DragonAgeLegend]

Anyone reckon a Geforce GTX 660 with 16GB RAm will be able to play DAI with no issues all on high?

EDIT: Obviously the specs aren't out right now but from general technical knowledge.

Modifié par wesam987, 15 octobre 2013 - 11:53 .

[PnXMarcin1PL]

Ur Gpu should be albe to run it np

[JerZey CJ]

Hope the OP doesn't mind me asking the same question in his thread, but do you guys think that the PC I plan on building will be able to play DAI well? Here's the part list:
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium

AMD FX-6350

ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0

Kingston HyperX Blu 8GB(2 x 4GB

Seagate ST1000DM003 1 TB

Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo

Cooler Master HAF 912 Advanced

ASUS 24X

Rosewill CAPSTONE-650

GIGABYTE Radeon HD 7870 OC GHZ Edition

[Jaulen]

Thanks for the thread. I'm wondering the same thing.

I have a Toshiba Qosmio x505-q880. Straight factory specs.

Bought when DA2 came out since my work laptop was struggling with DAO on high, and the desktop we had couldn't dream of running a game.

Wanting to make sure that I wont have to be on low settings for graphics (since the gameplay video and screenies look awesome!).

(and I know NOTHING about computers)

Modifié par Jaulen, 15 octobre 2013 - 07:26 .

[NagarAsh]

Jaulen wrote...

Thanks for the thread. I'm wondering the same thing.

I have a Toshiba Qosmio x505-q880. Straight factory specs.

Bought when DA2 came out since my work laptop was struggling with DAO on high, and the desktop we had couldn't dream of running a game.

Wanting to make sure that I wont have to be on low settings for graphics (since the gameplay video and screenies look awesome!).

(and I know NOTHING about computers)

well now thats a core i7 with nvedia..definitely not gonna be near as problematic as mine..i hope..

even while searching it says 'gaming laptop' to begin with...

Modifié par NagarAsh, 15 octobre 2013 - 07:43 .

[PnXMarcin1PL]

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

[JerZey CJ]

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

 i've asked around and nobody ever had a problem with/said I should change the AMD. What should I replace it with then? I know almost nothing about building PCs and that entire list is made up from what other people said I should use after showing them an initial list of parts that somebody else suggested I use.

[NagarAsh]

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

 i've asked around and nobody ever had a problem with/said I should change the AMD. What should I replace it with then? I know almost nothing about building PCs and that entire list is made up from what other people said I should use after showing them an initial list of parts that somebody else suggested I use.

well im not all into gaming for graphics as compared to gaming for storyline...but Nvedia is 1st, amd is next and intel is last (and on that - 'bang my head on wall while tearing my hear and crying out lound')...naah..just exaggeration...but really if i end up not being able to play daii on my sys that would among the most saddest day ever... 

[NagarAsh]

but thats what i dont get..i..i mean the latest tomb raider (2013), assassins creed 3, black list...i can play them all .

now my OP points to assassins creed 3 and blacklist (well..not as much as ac3) especially as even at low they are soo high and although i can play them very well the game gets a bit laggy for a few seconds and resumes back on and they both run on dx 9 instead of dx 11.1 for me and in assassins creed 3 all else is fine but i cant get the tunnel's symbol textures to work for like ever...so i figured its the problem of the graphics settings unless its a known glitch in the game and theres a solution for it that i dont at all know of...

whats more i can play tomb raider with texture resolition and graphics at high (not ultra high) and the rest at mid and only the hair tesselations at low, i can also play dragon age at high (although i can play it at very high, i just dont so as to save up my battery and as i really freak out hearing the speeding fan) with DX11 and also i read about this one thing on either tom's hardware or some other tech site and according to that one doesnt really need aliasing and the rest of the options 'on' to enjoy the game to the fullest. The most necessary options 'to keep a check on' are graphics and textures (thats unless u have a system that can handle the speed the game would consume, without slowing down your laptop, with all those on or you can spend money when ever needed - even if that whenever is a few weeks from when u bought the computer).

thx for all the responses..hope to hear more new about this..

cheers
thx
ash

[NagarAsh]

Maria Caliban wrote...

NagarAsh wrote...

im into gaming but at the end of the day i had to go with intel chip especially coz it holds for longer period of time before dying on its user and i need it for the 3Ds Max rendering and stuff in animation...now if im not wrong...which im most definitely not...if im not wrong the amd/nvedia will work excellent but for a year or so before it starts saying goodbye...

You're wrong.

NagarAsh wrote...

1stly, is th game gonna have as high default/minimum graphics as in case of ubisoft games ?

Yes, DA:I will have "high" minimum requirements like Assassin's Creed.

2ndly, if the graphics is gonna be so high even at the minimum settings will there be a textures patch that could help fans who cant afford those high end systems (like me) ?

The only time I've seen a texture patch, it was for HD textures. Those take more resources, not less.

k i get the textures part...and yeah ur right i guess...my bad...unless u arent and i meant something else but phrased it wrong or so...OH! well..anywho...

as for the 1st point..please elaborate on - why? ...

thx 

[PnXMarcin1PL]

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

 i've asked around and nobody ever had a problem with/said I should change the AMD. What should I replace it with then? I know almost nothing about building PCs and that entire list is made up from what other people said I should use after showing them an initial list of parts that somebody else suggested I use.

I know lots about building PC's and I claim again that AMD is slower than Intel. Search on google review of AMD and Intel cpu's. Also from my own personal experience I know Intel has 30-40% faster CPU's than AMD. I don't have a problem with your choice, it's your money not mine. I just want to advise you best option. What becomes chosen is up to you.

[AlexJK]

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

im not getting alienware because its overpriced. Im planning to get clevo it will cost 9300 zlotis in euro around 2330 euro.

Tax rebate or otherwise, you're buying a very expensive, very hot and slightly underperforming (for the cost) gaming machine. But of course, if you need a laptop for whatever reason and can't get a desktop, then fair enough.

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

Based on what? A misleading summary of the top-end of the desktop processor market?

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I know lots about building PC's and I claim again that AMD is slower than Intel. Search on google review of AMD and Intel cpu's. Also from my own personal experience I know Intel has 30-40% faster CPU's than AMD. I don't have a problem with your choice, it's your money not mine. I just want to advise you best option. What becomes chosen is up to you.

Has it occurred to you that maybe he doesn't want to spend money on a top-end Intel processor, and is perfectly happy with a slightly-less-top-end AMD option which will still perform perfectly well in a mainstream gaming machine? I mean, obviously it hasn't occurred to you. It should, I think. Otherwise giving fair advice is difficult!

Modifié par AlexJK, 16 octobre 2013 - 08:06 .

[artgeek25]

amd's new processors are actually better, still not as good performance wise as intels sandybridge range but good value for money in definitely feasible for gaming. personally i would opt for the fx8350 or an overclocked 8150.

[Iron Star]

The requirements for Battlefield 4, which is made with the same engine as DAI, were released some time ago. I think that BF4 will only be current-gen though, so while the requirements for DAI will most likely be higher it might give you an idea of what to expect. I know nothing about computers though so I might be completely wrong, but I hope this can help.

[PnXMarcin1PL]

AlexJK wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

im not getting alienware because its overpriced. Im planning to get clevo it will cost 9300 zlotis in euro around 2330 euro.

Tax rebate or otherwise, you're buying a very expensive, very hot and slightly underperforming (for the cost) gaming machine. But of course, if you need a laptop for whatever reason and can't get a desktop, then fair enough.

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

Based on what? A misleading summary of the top-end of the desktop processor market?

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I know lots about building PC's and I claim again that AMD is slower than Intel. Search on google review of AMD and Intel cpu's. Also from my own personal experience I know Intel has 30-40% faster CPU's than AMD. I don't have a problem with your choice, it's your money not mine. I just want to advise you best option. What becomes chosen is up to you.

Has it occurred to you that maybe he doesn't want to spend money on a top-end Intel processor, and is perfectly happy with a slightly-less-top-end AMD option which will still perform perfectly well in a mainstream gaming machine? I mean, obviously it hasn't occurred to you. It should, I think. Otherwise giving fair advice is difficult!

I know it's expensive but I can afford it with no issues. As my work demands I need to be on the move and I dont have stationary internet at home so laptop is only solution for me.
I've also mentioned that I know that from my personal experience that AMD cpu's are slower. Market analisys are fine but I don't fully trust them (most of them are lies).
Well I'm not sure if it has occured to you that I've said it's his money and his decision to make, not mine. So it's fine whatever he chooses. Plus he was asking on what I think of the config he wants to get and I've simply written my opinion about it and no, I said that Intel is faster than AMD and my intention was to give information instead of convincing him to my ideas. I thought it was quite obvious, guess I'm wrong. Anyway, there is no reason to go smarty on me.

Modifié par PnXMarcin1PL, 16 octobre 2013 - 12:28 .

[JerZey CJ]

AlexJK wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

im not getting alienware because its overpriced. Im planning to get clevo it will cost 9300 zlotis in euro around 2330 euro.

Tax rebate or otherwise, you're buying a very expensive, very hot and slightly underperforming (for the cost) gaming machine. But of course, if you need a laptop for whatever reason and can't get a desktop, then fair enough.

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...4

JerZeyCJ2 forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise.

Based on what? A misleading summary of the top-end of the desktop processor market?

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I know lots about building PC's and I claim again that AMD is slower than Intel. Search on google review of AMD and Intel cpu's. Also from my own personal experience I know Intel has 30-40% faster CPU's than AMD. I don't have a problem with your choice, it's your money not mine. I just want to advise you best option. What becomes chosen is up to you.

Has it occurred to you that maybe he doesn't want to spend money on a top-end Intel processor, and is perfectly happy with a slightly-less-top-end AMD option which will still perform perfectly well in a mainstream gaming machine? I mean, obviously it hasn't occurred to you. It should, I think. Otherwise giving fair advice is difficult!

...So is an AMD good for the price? Maybe I should have mentioned this in my first post, but that is a budget build as I do not have a lot of money at my disposal. And holy crap, I looked up "intel cpu" on google and they were going from around $550 all the up to $3,300.

[PnXMarcin1PL]

.

Modifié par PnXMarcin1PL, 16 octobre 2013 - 12:56 .

[AlexJK]

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

I've also mentioned that I know that from my personal experience that AMD cpu's are slower.

So... what? All AMD CPUs are slower than all Intel CPUs? Or, some AMD CPUs are slower than some Intel CPUs? Or, AMD produce more CPUs in the low- and mid-range than Intel do? Or, AMD CPUs are bad value for money, in your opinion? What? Saying "AMD CPUs are slower" doesn't mean anything. It's like saying "BMW cars are slower than Mercedes cars" - true for some, not for others, and when presented as a statement of fact, inaccurate.

Anyway, there is no reason to go smarty on me.

Whatever. When you post silly blanket statements like "Forget about AMD. AMD cpu's are utterly slow and bad performance wise", you should expect someone to pick you up on it. Sorry if that's "smarty".

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

So is an AMD good for the price? Maybe I should have mentioned this in my first post, but that is a budget build as I do not have a lot of money at my disposal.

For the money, the FX-6350 is great and will be absolutely fine for a budget-conscious build.

Edit: oh, and Dragon Age is awesome, yay! Cause otherwise this is getting a bit off topic

Modifié par AlexJK, 16 octobre 2013 - 01:53 .

[Fredvdp]

I got an AMD CPU for my budget gaming PC a few years back. (Phenom II x4 965 BE 3.4 Ghz) I've heard that AMD offers less speed per Ghz, but I get a very admirable performance for something this cheap.

[EnergizerBunny211]

I recently upgraded my desktop, specifically for DA:I that is due out next Fall...and ME 4 whenever it comes out.  My system is not entirely complete yet with everything I'm planning on, but so far I have a new Intel 4770 @ 3.4 Ghz, 16 Gigs (planning on 32) of G-Skill Ripjaws X @ 1600Mhz with an (older but still amazing) GTX 570 DCII from Nvidia/ASUS ((I'm planning on the 4G Superclocked Nvidia GTX 760 with the ACX Cooler from EVGA....the equivalent 770 is over 500 dollars, with no guarentee the price will drop in the future, so for the price vs comparable performance- I'm opting for the aforementioned 760), built on a new ASUS Maximus VI Hero motherboard and housed inside the CoolerMaster HAF-X Full Tower.

Looking forward into next Fall when DA:I comes out, I am supremely confident that with those project hardware specs that I will be able to run DA:I completely maxed-out with no problems.

So far, this new build has been the system that I've always wanted.....and I'm sure once it is complete it will last me well into the future (5-years or more).....My previous rig (Intel 9650 Quadcore 2 Extreme @ 3.00 Ghz and 8 Gigs of Kingston DDR2 @ 1066 with first the GTX 285 OC followed by the GTX 470 on an ASUS P5E Deluxe Mboard.)  lasted nearly a decade and probably would still be sufficient, but I opted this time for something totally new and up to date