194 réponses à ce sujet

[Gileadan]

Star fury wrote...

Burn the heretic! Kill the abomination! Purge the unclean!

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

[Lotion Soronarr]

in it for the lolz wrote...

I'll give you a pic as a clue as to how I would play my Inquisitor:
 

AVE IMPERATOR!


*walk over to a blood mage*


By the autohrity of God-Emperors Most Holy Inquisiton I declare thee Hereticus Diabolis and render the Emperors Judgment upon you! May the Emepror have mercy upon your soul, for his servants cannot!

*BLAM*

[Captain Crash]

Like all my Bioware games I will benice the first playthrough and a big meany the second

[Lotion Soronarr]

RobRam10 wrote...

zMataxa wrote...
You might get to like elves ...ALOT.

Like elves in general? NO!

Are you sure?





I like elves....a lot.

[Lotion Soronarr]

How my friends and mundanes will see me:


Alt:
http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/060/0/e/ultramarine_champion_by_lordhannu-d5wlrtu.jpg

How demons and mages will see me:
[img]http://img-cache.cdn.gaiaonline.com/c491dc4bb1ed425dba7fb7de88dd6c45/http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc23/krazykillamofo-kun/Black_templar_chaplain_by_LordHannu-1-1-1_zps3a933e31.jpg[/img]

[LobselVith8]

Karlone123 wrote...

Although it entirely depends on what social dialogue offers in different situations. How will your Inquisitor behave to friends/allies and enemies. Be quite specific on which people and organisations on how you will perceive them, such templars, mages, the chantry and etc. If I play as a Human Inquisitor, he will be pro-chantry/pro-templar and will have a dislike of magic if such options available. I'm obviously giving a generic way of thinking of how the Inquisitor will act. I don't know how a Qunari Inquisitor will act as it is open to interpretation. 

I'd like to play as an Inquisitor who is different than my prior two protagonists. My Warden was pragmatic, as he believed in the goal of the Grey Wardens stopping the darkspawn by any means necessary, and chose certain choices that would help the Order, such as sparing Avernus (and pushing him to unlock the secrets of the taint) and saving the Anvil of the Void, while my apostate Champion focused on overthrowing the templars and helping the mages.

My first run would ideally be as a Dalish Inquisitor who believes in the Creators, and would make choices that would enpower the Elvhen. I think my protagonist will be anti-Chantry and anti-templar due to their bad history (with their historical account of the fall of the Dales and their clans being hunted by templars), although I don't think he will automatically see the mage rebels as kin, even though he has the standard view of magic held by the People (I'd prefer starting off as a Dalish mage, and the Dalish view magic as a gift of the Creators). I think an alliance could be forged with the rebel mages, if they can come to a mutual agreement with my protagonist and his fledgling Inquisition.

Likely, he will be aloof with humans; I think a lifetime of bad experiences (for both the People and his clan) would make it the most likely reaction he would have. While my Surana Warden and my apostate Hawke were willing to work with templars (like Ser Otto and Ser Thrask, respectively), I'd prefer to play this character differently, and have him unwilling to work with the Templar Order. Working with active members of the Chantry wouldn't be ideal for my protagonist. As for the mages, I could see my Inquisitor being somewhat distrustful of pro-Circle mages as Ariane implied the Circles played a role in the fall of the Dales (and the loss of some of their lore).

As for stopping the veil tears into the Beyond, I'm leaning towards a militant type who might end up being ruthless in order to save Thedas from a demonic invasion. Just my two cents on my Inquisitor.

[Giant ambush beetle]

Gileadan wrote...

Star fury wrote...

Burn the heretic! Kill the abomination! Purge the unclean!

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

A new born is innocent.

[DooomCookie]

LobselVith8 wrote...

Karlone123 wrote...

Although it entirely depends on what social dialogue offers in different situations. How will your Inquisitor behave to friends/allies and enemies. Be quite specific on which people and organisations on how you will perceive them, such templars, mages, the chantry and etc. If I play as a Human Inquisitor, he will be pro-chantry/pro-templar and will have a dislike of magic if such options available. I'm obviously giving a generic way of thinking of how the Inquisitor will act. I don't know how a Qunari Inquisitor will act as it is open to interpretation. 

I'd like to play as an Inquisitor who is different than my prior two protagonists. My Warden was pragmatic, as he believed in the goal of the Grey Wardens stopping the darkspawn by any means necessary, and chose certain choices that would help the Order, such as sparing Avernus (and pushing him to unlock the secrets of the taint) and saving the Anvil of the Void, while my apostate Champion focused on overthrowing the templars and helping the mages.

My first run would ideally be as a Dalish Inquisitor who believes in the Creators, and would make choices that would enpower the Elvhen. I think my protagonist will be anti-Chantry and anti-templar due to their bad history (with their historical account of the fall of the Dales and their clans being hunted by templars), although I don't think he will automatically see the mage rebels as kin, even though he has the standard view of magic held by the People (I'd prefer starting off as a Dalish mage, and the Dalish view magic as a gift of the Creators). I think an alliance could be forged with the rebel mages, if they can come to a mutual agreement with my protagonist and his fledgling Inquisition.

Likely, he will be aloof with humans; I think a lifetime of bad experiences (for both the People and his clan) would make it the most likely reaction he would have. While my Surana Warden and my apostate Hawke were willing to work with templars (like Ser Otto and Ser Thrask, respectively), I'd prefer to play this character differently, and have him unwilling to work with the Templar Order. Working with active members of the Chantry wouldn't be ideal for my protagonist. As for the mages, I could see my Inquisitor being somewhat distrustful of pro-Circle mages as Ariane implied the Circles played a role in the fall of the Dales (and the loss of some of their lore).

As for stopping the veil tears into the Beyond, I'm leaning towards a militant type who might end up being ruthless in order to save Thedas from a demonic invasion. Just my two cents on my Inquisitor.

That's pretty detailed.  I played a Dalish Warden almost exactly like that.  It was a great playthrough, except I couldn't figure out whether to annull the mages or not and what my attitude to the dwarves was.  I'm not very good at this whole roleplaying business. 

When you say you don't want to work with templars, does that mean you won't initiate quests with templar quest givers and the like?  Because that could end up cutting out a fair bit of content.  How strict are you with roleplaying?

[Xilizhra]

How my friends and mundanes will see me:

How demons and mages will see me:

What, a terrible mascot army?

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

[Br3admax]

The Woldan wrote...

Gileadan wrote...

Star fury wrote...

Burn the heretic! Kill the abomination! Purge the unclean!

There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

A new born is innocent.

New borns were parasites that leached off of their mothers, technically. 

[Xilizhra]

Morocco Mole wrote...

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

By this logic GTA is a game for people who like running over cops and running over civillians

If running over cops/civilians was a universal human trait present in some form throughout all cultures, I might agree with you.

[Star fury]

Xilizhra wrote...

What, a terrible mascot army?

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

Blessed is the mind too small for doubt. © Imperial motto.

Clearly all who like W40k are xenophobes, those who like Imperium are all dictatorship lovers and hate democracy.

Modifié par Star fury, 11 octobre 2013 - 12:25 .

[Gill Kaiser]

My first character will probably be my standard approach - Chaotic Good, gives everyone a chance, but ruthless to enemies and those who squander that chance or persist with antagonizing my PC, his/her allies, or innocents.

[Xilizhra]

Star fury wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

How my friends and mundanes will see me:

How demons and mages will see me:

What, a terrible mascot army?

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

Blessed is the mind too small for doubt. ©

Clearly all who like W40k are xenophobes, those who like Imperium are all dictatorship lovers and hate democracy.

Oh, they might not be significantly xenophobic against anyone real, but humans have many darker instincts that most of us aren't in thrall to.

[Lotion Soronarr]

Xilizhra wrote...

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

Nope. Wrong way.

My custom DIY chapter is actually very diplomatic and has a non-agression pact with Eldars.


But MY theory that mage-love is literary atavism that appeals to peoples' persecution complexes and ego is right on track

[Xilizhra]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

Nope. Wrong way.

My custom DIY chapter is actually very diplomatic and has a non-agression pact with Eldars.


But MY theory that mage-love is literary atavism that appeals to peoples' persecution complexes and ego is right on track

This is just a guess, but I don't think you know what "atavism" means, as your use of it made no sense. Not only that, mage-love is an opinion about the story, not the story as such.

[RobRam10]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

in it for the lolz wrote...

I'll give you a pic as a clue as to how I would play my Inquisitor:
 

AVE IMPERATOR!


*walk over to a blood mage*


By the autohrity of God-Emperors Most Holy Inquisiton I declare thee Hereticus Diabolis and render the Emperors Judgment upon you! May the Emepror have mercy upon your soul, for his servants cannot!

*BLAM*

Death to the false Emperor. Glory to Chaos.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

Filthy mages beware ... I'm coming!

[Lotion Soronarr]

Morocco Mole wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...


Are you sure?

EEEEXCELLENT. Your will is weakining.

Yoin us


You know you want to!




Elf is Magic!
http://www.tentonham...mage/view/33934

[Lotion Soronarr]

Xilizhra wrote...

This is just a guess, but I don't think you know what "atavism" means, as your use of it made no sense. Not only that, mage-love is an opinion about the story, not the story as such.

Don't really care Xil.
I really don't.

All I know is that your psychological insights are a load of useless bovine excrement.

[Br3admax]

Miscellaneous Mind wrote...

The only good elf is a dead one.

Same goes for those filthy mages. I hope the elves and mages join forces so I can take them all out at once. It would be glorious.

You missed the elf blooded one though: