194 réponses à ce sujet

[Jaison1986]

I'll play as an human mage Inquisitor, and such, he will be highly bitter towards the Chantry and the Templars. He will also despise the Qunari for the way they treat their mages. he will be sympathetic to his fellow mages, however, he will not show much mercy to mages that fall to blood magic. He will be nice to the people all around, especially with city elfs (as he knows well what is like to be pushed around simply for being what you are).

[The Heretic of Time]

in it for the lolz wrote...

I'll give you a pic as a clue as to how I would play my Inquisitor:
 

That's pretty much a given. That's how a REAL inquisitor SHOULD be.


BURN THE HERETICS! KILL THE MUTANTS! PURGE THE UNCLEAN!

[Medhia Nox]

My mage Inquisitor will likely be "tired" "cold" and "stern".

Since violence is the typical form of conflict resolution in games - he'll likely come to blows with both the Templars and Mages - as he is not interested in either the selfish revolutionaries or the paranoid fascists.

He certainly won't be on either of their sides. If they fall in line with diplomacy - great, if not he will not hesitate to commit to the conflict he's forced into.

As for the Qunari - he'll likely come to blows with any Qunari forces he comes across. Invasion isn't an option - so any Qunari crossing his path with the desire to expand will have to be dealt with. There's no time during the demon tear issue to tolerate incursions by anyone trying to take advantage of the turmoil. Of course - if they're willing for genuine diplomacy (as opposed to Qunari demand making) - then I have no immediate quarrel with them.

The Dalish had also better fall in line. I'd be open to the idea of supporting them after the conflict - but they must assist without requirements or get out of the way and not hinder the conflict against the Fade - once the conflict is over, I would be willing to assist them to show good faith. If they oppose the Inquisition for whatever reason - they'll be another elven statistic.

Dwarves - assist or stay out of the way. I'd prefer assist though - since I imagine that would be huge allies against the Fade. I don't think there would be any reason to attack Orzammar or any dwarf outpost - but, if they get in the way of the Inquisition's goal of saving the world from the Fade... they too would have to be removed forcibly.

My mage Inquisitor will have no loyalty to any of Thedas' previous factions - only the Inquisition.

If the story states he created it - then he is going to be single mindedly devoted to it.

[The Heretic of Time]

I do wonder what BioWare's idea of an inquisitor is though. I don't think the writers at BioWare really know what "inquisition" really means. An inquisition is not an independent organisation that you create yourself. That's not what an inquisition is.

[Cainhurst Crow]

> Implying the inquisition is the same one as our worlds, and so must follow the same definition.
> Implying any orginization in dragon age is actually relatable in significant ways to our worldworld's counterparts.
> Implying templars of the real world had magic powers and policed mages.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 11 octobre 2013 - 03:25 .

[The Heretic of Time]

Xilizhra wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Also, my theory that 40K is a literary atavism that appeals to peoples' dark xenophobic sides is right on track.

By this logic GTA is a game for people who like running over cops and running over civillians

If running over cops/civilians was a universal human trait present in some form throughout all cultures, I might agree with you.

Seems to me that you don't know what you're talking about. Please STFU about a franchize you know nothing about, or at least have the decency to ask for more information before you pass judgement.

[Mashiro Yuki]

I wanna be a sexually aggressive Qunari.

Modifié par Foxxie x Lightning, 11 octobre 2013 - 03:26 .

[AresKeith]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

I do wonder what BioWare's idea of an inquisitor is though. I don't think the writers at BioWare really know what "inquisition" really means. An inquisition is not an independent organisation that you create yourself. That's not what an inquisition is.

They probably know what it really means

[9TailsFox]

Foxxie x Lightning wrote...

I wanna be a sexually aggressive Qunari.

We must have flirt option "Lady I am horny"

[The Heretic of Time]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

> Implying the inquisition is the same one as our worlds, and so must follow the same definition.
> Implying any orginization in dragon age is actually relatable in significant ways to our worldworld's counterparts.
> Implying templars of the real world had magic powers and policed mages.

All that doesn't matter. The very definition of "inquisition" is an army within a (religious) organization to actively deal with heresy. Take that away, and there is no reason to use the title "inquisition" anymore.

At leats the templars in Dragon Age still somewhat resemble the real-life historical templars (both are military orginazations working for a church).

[saMoorai]

I am going to play as a completely ruthless sexual deviant Qunari.

[Mashiro Yuki]

DAI Multiplayer. We're gonna have threeways saM.

[Br3admax]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

> Implying the inquisition is the same one as our worlds, and so must follow the same definition.
> Implying any orginization in dragon age is actually relatable in significant ways to our worldworld's counterparts.
> Implying templars of the real world had magic powers and policed mages.

Implying that BioWare cares about definitions. 

[OdanUrr]

I will be kingly.

[Vilegrim]

Merciless, calculating, and cruel. Utterly ruthless in pursuit of his ideology and goals.

[TheBlackBaron]

saMOOrai182 wrote...

I am going to play as a completely ruthless sexual deviant Qunari.

Will there be flayings involved? 

[Topsider]

I usually play neutral characters who make decisions based on the situation - good or evil. I'm practical. However, as the Inquisitor, I think a ruthless approach is warranted or you might seem weak and could be taken advantage of. I will demand respect whenever possible, not stoop low to earn it - and coercion has many forms, not just violence.

[LobselVith8]

DooomCookie wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I'd like to play as an Inquisitor who is different than my prior two protagonists. My Warden was pragmatic, as he believed in the goal of the Grey Wardens stopping the darkspawn by any means necessary, and chose certain choices that would help the Order, such as sparing Avernus (and pushing him to unlock the secrets of the taint) and saving the Anvil of the Void, while my apostate Champion focused on overthrowing the templars and helping the mages. 

My first run would ideally be as a Dalish Inquisitor who believes in the Creators, and would make choices that would enpower the Elvhen. I think my protagonist will be anti-Chantry and anti-templar due to their bad history (with their historical account of the fall of the Dales and their clans being hunted by templars), although I don't think he will automatically see the mage rebels as kin, even though he has the standard view of magic held by the People (I'd prefer starting off as a Dalish mage, and the Dalish view magic as a gift of the Creators). I think an alliance could be forged with the rebel mages, if they can come to a mutual agreement with my protagonist and his fledgling Inquisition.

Likely, he will be aloof with humans; I think a lifetime of bad experiences (for both the People and his clan) would make it the most likely reaction he would have. While my Surana Warden and my apostate Hawke were willing to work with templars (like Ser Otto and Ser Thrask, respectively), I'd prefer to play this character differently, and have him unwilling to work with the Templar Order. Working with active members of the Chantry wouldn't be ideal for my protagonist. As for the mages, I could see my Inquisitor being somewhat distrustful of pro-Circle mages as Ariane implied the Circles played a role in the fall of the Dales (and the loss of some of their lore).

As for stopping the veil tears into the Beyond, I'm leaning towards a militant type who might end up being ruthless in order to save Thedas from a demonic invasion. Just my two cents on my Inquisitor.

That's pretty detailed.  I played a Dalish Warden almost exactly like that.  It was a great playthrough, except I couldn't figure out whether to annull the mages or not and what my attitude to the dwarves was.  I'm not very good at this whole roleplaying business.  

When you say you don't want to work with templars, does that mean you won't initiate quests with templar quest givers and the like?  Because that could end up cutting out a fair bit of content.  How strict are you with roleplaying?

Thank you. I tend to gravitate towards mages in Dragon Age, so my canon protagonists have been magically inclined. As for being indecisive, I've changed my mind about how my character would handle a situation after much thought, so you're not alone. 

I don't intend on initiating quests with members of the Chantry or the templars, even if it means a loss of content for the experience. I get fairly into roleplaying my character and avoid meta-game choices that would run counter to how the character would go about doing it; basically, taking actions I think they would make. It's why I was also hoping to have the capacity to refuse certain companions (which would be a contrast to my prior canon runs, since my Surana Warden recruited everyone possible to combat the Blight, including Loghain, while my apostate Hawke was building bridges as an apostate in a templar controlled city-state). I would have liked the contrast.

As for companions, I'm still not sure how my protagonist will react to Varric; I suppose it depends on how much he's changed since his exploits in Kirkwall. I can already imagine problems with the Seeker Cassandra and pro-Circle Vivienne, since my protagonist is one of the People.

What about you, Dooom?

[Swoopdogg]

 Kind to most, especially allies and strangers. But ruthless to enemies and those who wrong me, unless they aren't a**holes

[BouncyFrag]

Morocco Mole wrote...

Those poor fictional elves and aliens

I think this every day. I'm not alone.

[Swoopdogg]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

I do wonder what BioWare's idea of an inquisitor is though. I don't think the writers at BioWare really know what "inquisition" really means. An inquisition is not an independent organisation that you create yourself. That's not what an inquisition is.

Dictionary.com says an inquisition is: "an official investigation, especially one of a political or religious nature, 
characterized by lack of regard for individual rights, 
prejudice on the part of the examiners, and recklessly cruelpunishments."

Google simply says:
"a period of prolonged and intensive questioning or investigation."

Doesn't say anything about whether it can be independent or not

[Ravensword]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...


Are you sure?

EEEEXCELLENT. Your will is weakining.

Yoin us


You know you want to!




Elf is Magic!
http://www.tentonham...mage/view/33934

I know a certain someone on here would be very interested in this fine display of characterization.

[The Heretic of Time]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Morocco Mole wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...


Are you sure?

EEEEXCELLENT. Your will is weakining.

Yoin us


You know you want to!




Elf is Magic!
http://www.tentonham...mage/view/33934

I don't get your obsession over elves. They're just humans with pointy ears. And the ones you link look like total sl*ts with those ridiculous non-armors.