dumdum2 wrote...
If you go back in this thread you'll see that a bunch of you guys weren't happy with my advice and wanted to make it look like my advice was bad, and that's why we are where we are right now.
Seems like that can only refer to me, as I was the first one to actually "argue" anything you wrote.
No one said anything about your advice being bad. Hell, I quite agree with the actual
advice you've given in this thread.
I was only pointing out that iLikeBWgames
had a point when he said that weapons like Claymore and Widow are good for survivability (not that I'd personally use Widow on a Huntress). The essence of my post was that
there are situations where high-impact/low-exposure weapons are
advantageous, and using RHA on weapons like Harrier doesn't completely negate those advantages.
dumdum2 wrote...
If everyone would just have left my answer alone then we wouldn't have to argue about it now would we?
How self-centered of you. Both I and Fortack commented your "answer" in a perfectly polite manner, which shouldn't bother you, as this is a discussion forum, after all. But maybe you should re-think the tone and attitude with which you adress others.