NuclearTech76 wrote...
Thing is most everyone really liked Jay. He was a nice guy. Kind of pains me to see that.ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Really.
While we're at it, why don't we bring up the accusations against Jay Hoxtatron?
*ducks, runs and hides*
I'm not srs btw, and neither is this thread.
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Thing is most everyone really liked Jay. He was a nice guy. Kind of pains me to see that.ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Really.
While we're at it, why don't we bring up the accusations against Jay Hoxtatron?
*ducks, runs and hides*
I'm not srs btw, and neither is this thread.
Modifié par ClydeInTheShell, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:29 .
Yeah, Link was always kind of a dick in comparison.NuclearTech76 wrote...
Thing is most everyone really liked Jay. He was a nice guy. Kind of pains me to see that.ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Really.
While we're at it, why don't we bring up the accusations against Jay Hoxtatron?
*ducks, runs and hides*
I'm not srs btw, and neither is this thread.
Guest_Element 0_*
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
NuclearTech76 wrote...
Fair enough. Let's just say that the behaviour of instakill enemies was very odd in some of his videos. And I mean there is a close call or two in a lot of legit solos but you only get away with that crap for so long before you get shanked.Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
ISHYGDDT wrote...
Yeah, Link was always kind of a dick in comparison.NuclearTech76 wrote...
Thing is most everyone really liked Jay. He was a nice guy. Kind of pains me to see that.ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Really.
While we're at it, why don't we bring up the accusations against Jay Hoxtatron?
*ducks, runs and hides*
I'm not srs btw, and neither is this thread.
Modifié par Deerber, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:44 .
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Modifié par OperatingWookie, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:44 .
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
Modifié par Deerber, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:45 .
Guest_Element 0_*
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
Modifié par Element 0, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:46 .
But we need our heroes. So we can then tear them down. And when we run out of heroes, we'll just beat on the dead one's corpses.OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
No it doesn't matter and it never mattered.
But there was solid proof that Link was using 6/6/6/6/6 and he never denied it.
That's all.
Guest_Element 0_*
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
No it doesn't matter and it never mattered.
But there was solid proof that Link was using 6/6/6/6/6 and he never denied it.
That's all.
If it never mattered, then you wouldn't have perpetuated this. You wouldn't have been the judge that led to other posters along with N7-Link leaving the forums because of the drama.
You made this matter, and that is why the forums are the way they are.
Modifié par MaxShine, 18 octobre 2013 - 01:52 .
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
No it doesn't matter and it never mattered.
But there was solid proof that Link was using 6/6/6/6/6 and he never denied it.
That's all.
If it never mattered, then you wouldn't have perpetuated this. You wouldn't have been the judge that led to other posters along with N7-Link leaving the forums because of the drama.
You made this matter, and that is why the forums are the way they are.
Yeap. I'm the bad guy.
Deerber wrote...
ISHYGDDT wrote...
Yeah, Link was always kind of a dick in comparison.NuclearTech76 wrote...
Thing is most everyone really liked Jay. He was a nice guy. Kind of pains me to see that.ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Really.
While we're at it, why don't we bring up the accusations against Jay Hoxtatron?
*ducks, runs and hides*
I'm not srs btw, and neither is this thread.
Well, I had no problem with Link, he was not that bad, but Jay is just that much cooler and nicer.
FasterThanFTL wrote...
Poor guy was crucified for something almost everyone does now. That is use 66666 builds. His crime was to have 200 extra shields, that is what made him so amazing the 200 extra shields nevermind all the other cool stuff he pulled off.
Guest_Element 0_*
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
No it doesn't matter and it never mattered.
But there was solid proof that Link was using 6/6/6/6/6 and he never denied it.
That's all.
If it never mattered, then you wouldn't have perpetuated this. You wouldn't have been the judge that led to other posters along with N7-Link leaving the forums because of the drama.
You made this matter, and that is why the forums are the way they are.
Yeap. I'm the bad guy.
You're really not the good guy or the bad guy here. It's pretty subjective.
That's not to say there weren't consequences.
Beerfish wrote...
FasterThanFTL wrote...
Poor guy was crucified for something almost everyone does now. That is use 66666 builds. His crime was to have 200 extra shields, that is what made him so amazing the 200 extra shields nevermind all the other cool stuff he pulled off.
I think you are gravely mistaken.
OperatingWookie wrote...
You're really not the good guy or the bad guy here. It's pretty subjective.
That's not to say there weren't consequences.
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Element 0 wrote...
Deerber wrote...
NuclearTech76 wrote...
It's not only the 66666 builds. The guy had instakill enemies fixed where there was no chance of him getting killed that way, also had the updating of the AI to retarded speed where it's almost impossible to be shot, had damage increased on some attacks as well.
Carry on defending him though.
Now, I don't want to defend him, but the only thing there was solid proof of was the 3rd you mentioned. The 1st one cannot, by its own nature, be proven, and the 2nd can only be "proven" up to a bit.
That said, the 3rd alone is more than enough to justify him being criticized that much on bsn.
*snip*
Does it make a difference anymore? Let the dust settle. Let the past rest.
No it doesn't matter and it never mattered.
But there was solid proof that Link was using 6/6/6/6/6 and he never denied it.
That's all.
If it never mattered, then you wouldn't have perpetuated this. You wouldn't have been the judge that led to other posters along with N7-Link leaving the forums because of the drama.
You made this matter, and that is why the forums are the way they are.
Yeap. I'm the bad guy.
You're really not the good guy or the bad guy here. It's pretty subjective.
That's not to say there weren't consequences.
Consiquences were for the better.
All the BSN were freakin zombies lining up to to give Linkinson a BJ. And after that the BSN turned into bitter sexless people
ClydeInTheShell wrote...
Beerfish wrote...
FasterThanFTL wrote...
Poor guy was crucified for something almost everyone does now. That is use 66666 builds. His crime was to have 200 extra shields, that is what made him so amazing the 200 extra shields nevermind all the other cool stuff he pulled off.
I think you are gravely mistaken.
Yeah I don't agree with this assertion either. Not "almost everyone" cheats. There are people on these forums who look down on cheating and won't cheat even though there are no longer consequences attached to it.
Eh it could get better.Ledgend1221 wrote...
Nothing like some good BSN drama.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
